KabuDo

NYSE: SPGI · Financial Exchanges & Data

S&P Global

S&P Global, based in New York, provides credit ratings, benchmarks, data and analytics. 2025 revenue was $15,336M: Market Intelligence $4,902M, Ratings $4,549M, Energy $2,299M, Indices $1,839M and Mobility $1,747M. Operating margin reached 42%. It spun off Mobility as Mobility Global on July 1, 2026, sold its Enterprise Data Management and thinkFolio businesses in January 2026, and bought With Intelligence in November 2025.

Last updated

Analysis last edited: November 6, 2026 · Financial data fetched: November 4, 2026 15:28 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: February 11, 2026

Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-02-1110-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) · filed 2026-10-28Proxy statement (2026)

Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.

01

At a glanceFrom SEC data

Eight headline measures, each placed among the companies covered on this site.

Revenue growth
15.6%

Higher than 82% of 372 non-financial companies

Average yearly growth over the years shown

Operating margin
42.2%

Higher than 92% of 311 non-financial companies

Latest fiscal year (FY2025)

ROIC minus WACC
+2.5 pts

Higher than 46% of 311 non-financial companies

Return on capital above (or below) its estimated cost

Net debt ÷ EBITDA
1.5x

Higher than 44% of 304 non-financial companies

Below 0 means more cash than debt

Cash conversion
1.26x

Higher than 32% of 349 non-financial companies

Operating cash flow ÷ net income

Dividend raises
5 of 5

Years the dividend per share rose, of the last 5

P/E today
28.8x

Latest close 2026-11-04; trailing 12 months to 2026-09-30

Beta
0.83

Above 1 = moves more than the market

Each marker shows where this company sits among the non-financial companies covered on this site, not all listed companies (left = lowest, right = highest). A high position is not automatically good — for net debt ÷ EBITDA, higher means more debt. Details and formulas are in the sections below and in How to read this.

02

Valuation todayFrom SEC data

Price-based measures at the latest close, next to the same measures at the last fiscal year-end.

Share price$479.68close on 2026-11-04

Market cap$143.33B

P/E today
28.8x

At FY2025 year-end: 33.7x

Earnings: trailing 12 months to 2026-09-30

P/B today
4.6x

At FY2025 year-end: 4.7x

Book value at FY2025 year-end

EV/EBITDA today
20.2x

At FY2025 year-end: 20.8x

EBITDA for FY2025

FCF yield today
3.8%

At FY2025 year-end: 3.7%

Free cash flow for FY2025

Dividend yield today
0.8%

Dividends per share for FY2025

“Today” uses the latest closing price (2026-11-04, Yahoo Finance daily closing prices) and shares outstanding at the last fiscal year-end. The rest of this page — including the financial table and ROIC vs. WACC — uses fiscal year-end prices. These are reference figures, not a judgment of whether the stock is cheap or expensive.

03

What changed since last earningsFrom SEC data

The latest reported quarter against the same quarter a year earlier, the balance sheet against the previous quarter-end, and what management said in its latest earnings release.

Quarter ended Sep 30, 2026.

  • Revenue↑ +6.8%$3.44B → $3.68B (vs. a year earlier)
  • Operating margin↑ +8.0 pts45.2% → 53.2% (vs. a year earlier)
  • Net income↑ +5.4%$1.18B → $1.24B (vs. a year earlier)
  • Diluted EPS↑ +10.1%$3.86 → $4.25 (vs. a year earlier)
  • Cash↓ −41.0%$4.13B → $2.44B (vs. previous quarter-end)
  • Long-term debt↓ −13.9%$15.17B → $13.06B (vs. previous quarter-end)

Source: Form 10-Q ↗ (SEC XBRL). Long-term debt is the tagged long-term debt figure and leaves out short-term borrowings.

From the earnings release of Oct 27, 2026.

Management outlook • Issued

2026 guidance calls for revenue growth of 7.4%–8.4%. Source sentence
2026 guidance calls for revenue growth of 7.4% to 8.4%, and organic constant currency growth of 7.5% to 8.5%.

Key changes

  • Q3 revenue $3.678B, up 7%. Source sentence
    The Company reported third-quarter 2026 revenue of $3.678 billion, an increase of 7% compared to the third quarter of 2025.
  • GAAP net income up 20% to $1.298B. Source sentence
    Third quarter GAAP net income increased 20% to $1.298 billion and GAAP diluted earnings per share increased 26% to $4.45.
  • Repurchased $2.6B of shares in Q3. Source sentence
    In the third quarter, the Company executed $2.6 billion in share repurchases, and has repurchased more than $4 billion in shares year-to-date.

Written by AI. A line appears only if its figures and direction match the quoted sentence, which an automatic check confirms. Companies' outlooks are their own and may not be met. Read the release ↗

04

Company profileFrom SEC dataShow

Legal name
S&P Global Inc.
Headquarters
NEW YORK, NY
Incorporated in
New York
Fiscal year end
12/31
Exchange & ticker
NYSE: SPGI
Industry
Financial Exchanges & Data
CIK
64040

Workforce (as of FY2025 year-end)

  • Employees

    44,500

Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) cover page and business description

05

Earnings calendarFrom SEC dataShow

When the company reports each quarter: the quarter-end date, the day results were released, and when the 10-Q or 10-K was filed.

Next report

Q4 FY2026

Quarter end: December 2026. In past years, Q4 results were released 39–42 days after quarter end (Feb 10, 2026; Feb 11, 2025; Feb 8, 2024). No date has been announced in the sources this site uses.

Reporting pattern

  • Fiscal year ends around December 31.
  • Reports four times a year: three quarterly reports (10-Q) and an annual report (10-K) for Q4.
  • Earnings releases came 24–42 days after quarter end over the last 12 quarters.
QuarterQuarter endedEarnings release (8-K)Report filed (10-Q / 10-K)
Q3 FY2026Sep 30, 2026Oct 27, 2026 (+27 days)Oct 28, 2026 10-Q (+28 days)
Q2 FY2026Jun 30, 2026Jul 28, 2026 (+28 days)Jul 28, 2026 10-Q (+28 days)
Q1 FY2026Mar 31, 2026Apr 28, 2026 (+28 days)Apr 28, 2026 10-Q (+28 days)
Q4 FY2025Dec 31, 2025Feb 10, 2026 (+41 days)Feb 11, 2026 10-K (+42 days)
Q3 FY2025Sep 30, 2025Oct 30, 2025 (+30 days)Oct 30, 2025 10-Q (+30 days)
Q2 FY2025Jun 30, 2025Jul 31, 2025 (+31 days)Aug 1, 2025 10-Q (+32 days)
Q1 FY2025Mar 31, 2025Apr 29, 2025 (+29 days)Apr 29, 2025 10-Q (+29 days)
Q4 FY2024Dec 31, 2024Feb 11, 2025 (+42 days)Feb 11, 2025 10-K (+42 days)
Q3 FY2024Sep 30, 2024Oct 24, 2024 (+24 days)Oct 25, 2024 10-Q (+25 days)
Q2 FY2024Jun 30, 2024Jul 30, 2024 (+30 days)Jul 30, 2024 10-Q (+30 days)
Q1 FY2024Mar 31, 2024Apr 25, 2024 (+25 days)Apr 25, 2024 10-Q (+25 days)
Q4 FY2023Dec 31, 2023Feb 8, 2024 (+39 days)Feb 9, 2024 10-K (+40 days)

Source: SEC EDGAR filing history. Release dates are the dates the earnings release was furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K (Item 2.02), which is normally the day results are announced. For a quarter whose 10-Q or 10-K isn’t filed yet, the date is the latest Item 2.02 8-K since the previous report, which may be a preliminary or other results-related update. Fiscal years are labeled by the calendar year in which they end.

06

Flagship products & servicesSite analysis

  • Ratings

    Credit ratings

    Independent credit ratings.

  • Indices

    S&P Dow Jones Indices

    Benchmarks licensed to ETFs and funds.

  • Market Intelligence

    Data and analytics

    Data, analytics and workflow software.

  • Energy

    S&P Global Energy

    Energy data and price assessments.

From the Form 10-K, FY2025.

U.S. and worldwide share of flagship products/services

No market share figure is stated in the 10-K.

Reviewed: Form 10-K (FY2025) · Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30)

07

Recent strategic focusSite analysis

Recent developments.

  1. Q3 2026 results

    Revenue from continuing operations $3,678M; net income $1,240M (vs $1,176M).

    Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30)

  2. Mobility spin-off

    Completed July 1, 2026 as Mobility Global Inc.

    Source: Form 8-K (2026-07-02) — Items 1.01, 2.01 Mobility Global separation

  3. Portfolio

    Sold EDM and thinkFolio in January 2026; bought With Intelligence November 2025.

    Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30)

Capex ÷ D&A (FY2025)

0.17x

Below depreciation — investment is being pared back

formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization

e.g.$195M ÷ $1,179M = 0.17x

termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)

M&A spend (6-year total)

$2.71B

Latest year: $2.02B

Cash-flow-statement spending on acquisitions, net of cash acquired

Where the money goes, over time

Unit: $M. Capex went from $76M in FY2020 to $195M in FY2025

  • Capex
  • M&A spend

formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization

termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-11

08

Key figures at a glanceFrom SEC data

FY2020–FY2025, 6 years.

Revenue (FY2025)

$15.34B

As reported in the 10-K

Revenue CAGR (5 years)

+15.6%▲favorable

formula(last-period revenue ÷ first-period revenue) ^ (1 ÷ years) − 1

e.g.($15,336M ÷ $7,442M) ^ (1÷5) − 1 = 15.6%

termsCAGR · ^ (exponent) · Revenue (net sales)

Operating margin (FY2025)

42.2%▼caution

-6.4pt vs. 5 years ago

formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100

e.g.$6,478M ÷ $15,336M × 100 = 42.2%

termsOperating income · Revenue (net sales)

ROE (FY2025)

13.9%▲favorable

6-year average: 124.5%

As reported in the 10-K

P/B (FY2025 end)

4.75x

formulafiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share

e.g.$494.41 ÷ $104.17 = 4.75x

termsP/B · BVPS

Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's P/B

EV/EBITDA (FY2025 end)

20.8x

formula(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization)

e.g.($147,729M + $13,088M − $1,745M) ÷ ($6,478M + $1,179M) = 20.8x

termsEV/EBITDA · Market capitalization · Interest-bearing debt · EBITDA · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)

Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's multiple

  • ▲

    Revenue grew +15.6% a year over 5 years (strong growth)

    From $7.44B in FY2020 to $15.34B in FY2025. The annualized rate (CAGR) makes it possible to compare growth pace across companies of different sizes.

  • ▼

    Operating margin declined: 48.6% → 42.2%

    How much operating profit is left per $100 of revenue. It moved -6.4 points over 5 years — pricing power, cost control, and product mix all show up here.

  • ▲

    Equity ratio is 50.9% (a high level of financial stability)

    The share of total assets funded by equity rather than debt. 50%+ is often read as low bankruptcy risk, though the right level varies by industry (real estate and leasing run lower, for instance).

  • ▲

    Free cash flow was positive in 6 of 6 years

    Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures: the cash left over after funding the business’s own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. A negative year can mean heavy investment, or weak core earnings — worth distinguishing.

  • ▲

    ROE averaged 124.5% over 6 years (latest: 13.9%)

    How much profit was generated on shareholders’ equity. Roughly 10%+ is often cited as solid for a U.S. company, though this varies a lot by industry and capital intensity.

09

Business modelSite analysis

Earns fees for rating debt, subscription fees for data and analytics, and asset-linked fees from indices.

How money and goods flow at S&P Global
  1. 01 what it draws on

    Inputs & resources

    • Benchmarks and proprietary data
    • Data quality, analytical capabilities and research
    • S&P Dow Jones Indices brands
  2. 02 what it does

    Activities

    • Credit ratings
    • Data, analytics and workflow solutions
    • Benchmarks and energy price assessments
  3. 03 who it serves

    Customers

    • Debt issuers and investors
    • Financial institutions
    • Energy and other corporates
  4. 04 how money comes in

    How it earns

    • Revenue $15,336M (2025)
    • Market Intelligence $4,902M; Ratings $4,549M
    • Indices asset-linked fees

How the business makes money

  • No customer above 10% of revenue.
  • U.S. revenue $9,322M of the total.
  • Quarterly dividend raised to $0.97 in January 2026.

Government & regulation around the business

Non-market factors from the company’s filings: what governments and regulators fund, buy, set, approve or restrict, and which part of the flow above each one touches.

Ratings is a regulated activity.

  • Approvals & licenses

    Ratings regulators

    Ratings operations face regulatory and governmental inquiries.

    Constrains the businessTouches: Activities

    Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)

Revenue by segment (FY2025)

Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue

  • Market Intelligence

    4,902 (32%)
  • Ratings

    4,549 (30%)
  • Energy

    2,299 (15%)
  • Indices

    1,839 (12%)
  • Mobility (spun off 2026)

    1,747 (11%)

Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) External revenue. Mobility became a separate company on July 1, 2026.

10

Where it earnsSite analysis

Many U.S.-listed companies earn most of their revenue outside the U.S. — this breaks down revenue by country/region so it's clear where the business actually makes its money.

Largest market (FY2025)

U.S. — 61% of revenue

Revenue by country / region (FY2025)

Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue

  • U.S.

    9,322 (61%)
  • European region

    3,531 (23%)
  • Asia

    1,640 (11%)
  • Rest of the world

    843 (5%)

Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)

11

Contract structureSite analysisShow

Short-term or spot sales carry different earnings quality than long-term or auto-renewing contracts — this shows how the company actually contracts with its customers.

12

Alliances & capital tiesSite analysisShow

Equity stakes, joint ventures, and strategic partnerships disclosed across the 10-K, 8-Ks, and proxy statement.

  • Joint venture

    CME Group

    S&P Dow Jones Indices is a joint venture between S&P Global and CME Group.

    Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)

13

Customers & suppliersSite analysis

Who the company sells to and buys from. Companies rarely name either, so named counterparties come only from the company's own filings and press releases; otherwise this lists the concentration figures the 10-K discloses.

Customers

Issuers, investors and corporates.

Named by the company

What the filings disclose

Suppliers

Not a material disclosure in the 10-K.

Named by the company

14

Competitors & peersSite analysis

Competitors the 10-K names, and the peer group the company itself chose in its proxy statement. Nothing here is this site's own pick.

Proxy names a performance peer group.

Competitors named in the 10-K

Peer group the company chose

Peer group, from the proxy statement. Peers are companies the board considers comparable — for example when setting executive pay — not necessarily direct competitors.

TSR peer group: Moody’s, CME Group, MSCI, FactSet, Verisk and Intercontinental Exchange.

Source: Proxy statement (2026)

Company names link to this site’s analysis where one exists; “site ↗” opens the company’s own website.

15

Six years of financialsFrom SEC data

Each chart's axis holds a single unit (never mixing dollars, %, and $/share). The table's per-period header links to the filing the numbers came from.

Revenue over time

Unit: $M

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-11

Profit over time (operating → net)

Unit: $M

  • Operating income
  • Pretax income
  • Net income

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-11

Margins over time

Unit: %

  • Operating margin
  • Net margin

formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100

termsOperating income · Revenue (net sales)

formulanet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100

termsNet income (attributable to the company)

Cash flow over time

Unit: $M (below zero = cash went out)

  • Operating CF
  • Investing CF
  • Free CF

formulacash flow from operations − capital expenditures

termsFree cash flow (FCF) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Capital expenditures (capex)

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-11

Financial stability & capital efficiency

Unit: %

  • Equity ratio
  • ROE

formulatotal equity ÷ total assets × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)

termsStockholders’ equity · Total assets

formulanet income ÷ average equity (beginning + ending, ÷2) × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)

termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Stockholders’ equity

Earnings per share (EPS) and dividend per share

Unit: $

  • EPS
  • Dividend per share

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-11

Line itemFY202010-K on EDGAR ↗FY202110-K on EDGAR ↗FY202210-K on EDGAR ↗FY202310-K on EDGAR ↗FY202410-K on EDGAR ↗FY202510-K on EDGAR ↗
Income statement ($M)
Revenue7,4428,29711,18112,49714,20815,336
Operating income3,6174,2214,9444,0205,5806,478
Pretax income3,2284,1644,7023,6715,3086,227
Net income (attributable)2,3393,0243,2482,6263,8524,471
Revenue growthcalc(this year’s revenue − last year’s revenue) ÷ last year’s revenue × 100—11.5%34.8%11.8%13.7%7.9%
Operating margincalcoperating income ÷ revenue × 10048.6%50.9%44.2%32.2%39.3%42.2%
Net margincalcnet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 10031.4%36.4%29.0%21.0%27.1%29.2%
Balance sheet ($M)
Total assets12,53715,02661,78460,58960,22161,200
Total equity5712,10736,47734,30033,25631,235
Interest-bearing debtSum of short- and long-term borrowings, notes/bonds payable4,1104,11410,95611,45911,39813,088
Equity ratio4.1%13.5%58.9%56.4%55.1%50.9%
ROE459.5%238.0%16.9%7.4%11.4%13.9%
Cash flow ($M)
Operating CF3,5673,5982,6033,7105,6895,651
Investing CF-240-1203,628562-255-704
Financing CF-2,166-1,013-11,326-4,280-4,998-4,930
Free cash flowcalccash flow from operations − capital expenditures3,4913,5632,5143,5675,5655,456
Cash and equivalents4,1086,4971,2861,2901,6661,745
Per share & other
EPS ($)9.6612.5110.208.2312.3514.66
BVPS ($)2.128.43113.04108.88107.73104.17
Dividend per share ($)2.683.083.323.603.643.84
Payout ratiocalcdividend per share ÷ diluted EPS × 10027.7%24.6%32.5%43.7%29.5%26.2%
P/E (x)32.235.731.150.638.233.7
EV/EBITDA (x)calc(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization)19.623.918.727.322.920.8
P/B (x)calcfiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share147.0152.952.803.834.374.75

P/B and EV/EBITDA use each period’s period-end (fiscal year-end) figures, not the current share price. Figures without a "calc" tag are as reported in the Form 10-K (the consolidated financial statements and, for older years, earlier 10-Ks), pulled automatically from SEC EDGAR. Where a later filing restated a prior period, the restated figure is used.

Last 8 quarters

Three-month figures from 10-Q filings. Change is versus the same quarter a year earlier. Newest quarter on top.

Quarter endedRevenueOperating incomeNet incomeDiluted EPS
2026-09-30$3.68B+6.8%$1.96B+25.7%$1.24B+5.4%$4.25
2026-06-30$4.15B+10.4%$1.81B+16.8%$1.22B+13.5%$4.12
2026-03-31$4.17B+10.4%$2B+26.9%$1.4B+28.0%$4.69
2025-12-31 †$4.36B+21.4%$1.79B+37.0%$1.13B+28.9%—
2025-09-30$3.44B$1.56B$1.18B$3.86
2025-06-30$3.76B$1.55B$1.07B$3.50
2025-03-31$3.78B$1.58B$1.09B$3.54
2024-12-31 †$3.59B$1.31B$879M—

† Fourth quarter = the 10-K’s annual figure minus the first three quarters; quarterly EPS isn’t derived this way because share counts change during the year.

16

Is ROIC above WACC?From SEC data

ROIC (the return on money invested in the business) above WACC (the cost of raising that money) means the company is creating value. WACC is an estimate, so its assumptions can be adjusted below.

ROIC (FY2025)

11.4%

formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)

e.g.$6,478M × (1 − 22%) ÷ $44,489M × 100 = 11.4%

termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity

WACC (this site’s estimate)

8.88%

formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight

e.g.Equity weight: $147.73B ÷ ($147.73B + $13.09B) = 91.9%

e.g.Debt weight: $13.09B ÷ ($147.73B + $13.09B) = 8.1%

e.g.WACC: 9.5% × 91.9% + 2.2% × (1 − 22%) × 8.1% = 8.88%

termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization

ROIC − WACC

+2.5pt▲favorable

Earning more than the cost of capital (ROIC > WACC in 5 of 6 years)

formulaROIC − WACC (positive means the business earns more than its cost of capital)

termsROIC · WACC

How firm is this? With the equity risk premium ±1 point and beta ±0.2, WACC runs 7.3%–10.8% and ROIC − WACC runs +0.5 to +4.1 points. The sign holds across this range. This describes the latest year and does not predict future value creation.

WACC 8.88% is this site’s estimate under the assumptions below (not a figure the company has published)

Risk-free rate
4.95% (10-year Treasury, 2026-11-03)
β
0.83 (price-derived adjusted beta)
Equity risk premium
5.5%
Cost of equity
9.52%
Cost of debt
2.19%
Tax rate
22% (effective rate, FY2023–FY2025)
Capital structure (equity : debt)
92% : 8%
→ Change assumptions and recalculate

ROIC over time, vs. WACC

Unit: % — bars = each period's ROIC, horizontal line = latest WACC. Bars above the line are green, below are red

  • ROIC (above WACC)
  • ROIC (below WACC)
  • WACC 8.88%

formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)

termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity

formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight

termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization

Try different WACC assumptions

β and the equity risk premium are estimates with a real range of plausible values — move the sliders to check whether ROIC > WACC still holds. The risk-free rate starts at the 10-year Treasury yield on 2026-11-03 (U.S. Treasury).

Initial β: 0.83 (price-derived adjusted beta. Raw β 0.74, R² 0.17, 130 weeks)

formula0.67 × β + 0.33 (β = the slope of weekly stock returns regressed on weekly market returns)

e.g.0.67 × 0.743 + 0.33 = 0.828

termsβ (beta)

Period 2024-05-10–2026-11-04, using S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy. Source: Yahoo Finance price history.

Cost of equity9.52%

formularisk-free rate + β × equity risk premium

e.g.5.0% + 0.83 × 5.5% = 9.5%

termsCAPM · Risk-free rate · β (beta) · Equity risk premium (market risk premium)

Market value of equity$147.73B

formulafiscal year-end closing price × shares outstanding (= market cap)

termsMarket capitalization · Market value of equity

Interest-bearing debt$13.09B
Cost of debt2.19%

formulainterest expense ÷ interest-bearing debt × 100 (clamped to 0–10%; falls back to the risk-free rate if there’s no debt)

termsInterest-bearing debt · Risk-free rate

Capital structure (equity weight : debt weight)92% : 8%

17

What the price implies (DCF)From SEC data

A company's value can be written as its free cash flow divided by (cost of capital − perpetual growth). Working that backwards from the market's valuation shows how much growth the share price assumed — compared here with the company's actual past growth.

Growth the price implies (price on 2026-11-04)

5.4%

Perpetual FCF growth: g = r − FCF ÷ EV = 8.9% − 3.5%

Past FCF growth (FY2020–FY2025)

+9.3%

Compound annual rate, 5 years

Past revenue growth (FY2020–FY2025)

+15.6%

Compound annual rate, 5 years

Inputs (FY2025): free cash flow $5.46B (operating CF − capex); enterprise value $154.62B = market cap $143.33B (latest close, 2026-11-04) + debt $13.09B − cash and short-term investments $1.8B; r = WACC of 8.9% using this page’s default assumptions (β 0.83, risk-free 5.0%, market premium 5.5%).

Three WACC scenarios

The same calculation under cautious, base and optimistic cost-of-capital assumptions (risk-free rate fixed at the 10-year Treasury yield). Pick one to load it into the sliders below.

Try your own assumptions

V = FCF ÷ (r − g). It starts at the implied growth rate, where the theoretical value equals today’s enterprise value.

Theoretical enterprise value

$155.89B

FCF $5.46B ÷ (8.9% − 5.4%)

Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value

1.01x

Above 1x: these assumptions value the business above the market did

How sensitive the answer is

Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value for each combination of r and g.

g \ r6.9%7.9%8.9%9.9%10.9%
0%0.51x0.45x0.40x0.36x0.32x
2%0.72x0.60x0.51x0.45x0.40x
4%1.22x0.90x0.72x0.60x0.51x
6%3.92x1.86x1.22x0.90x0.72x
8%——3.92x1.86x1.22x

A simplified model for seeing what the market price assumes, not a forecast or a target price. It treats free cash flow as growing at one constant rate forever; the result swings widely with small changes in r and g, and is undefined when g reaches r. Free cash flow here is operating cash flow minus capex, which is after interest — a full DCF of enterprise value would use cash flow before interest. Market cap uses the latest close (2026-11-04) × shares at fiscal year-end; free cash flow and WACC inputs are from the latest fiscal year.

18

Earnings qualityFrom SEC dataShow

The same reported profit can mean different things depending on whether it's backed by cash, driven by the core business, or the result of a one-off item. Four checks below.

  • ✓

    Operating CF ÷ net income: averages 1.28x

    Profit is backed by cash coming in.

  • ✓

    Accrual ratio (latest): -1.9%

    A small share of profit rests on accounting estimates.

  • ✓

    Core-earnings share (operating income ÷ pretax income): 104%

    Most profit comes from core operations.

  • ✓

    Days sales outstanding: 78 → 75 days

    No major slowdown in collecting on sales.

Operating CF vs. net income

Unit: $M — operating CF above net income means profit is backed by cash

  • Operating CF
  • Net income

formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company

termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)

formula(net income − operating CF) ÷ average total assets × 100

termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Total assets

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-11

Profit bridge (FY2025)

Unit: $M — what moved profit from operating income to net income

  • Profit (each stage)
  • Pushed profit up
  • Pushed profit down

formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100

termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-11

Receivables & inventory days

Unit: days — days grow when receivables or inventory build up faster than sales

  • Days sales outstanding

formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365

termsAccounts receivable · Revenue (net sales)

formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365

termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)

Worked examples (latest period)

formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company

e.g.$5,651M ÷ $4,471M = 1.26x

termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)

formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100

e.g.$6,478M ÷ $6,227M × 100 = 104%

termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)

formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365

e.g.($2,867M + $3,441M) ÷ 2 ÷ $15,336M × 365 = 75 days

termsAccounts receivable · Revenue (net sales)

formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365

termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)

19

Who holds the sharesFrom SEC dataShow

How much of the stock large institutional investors report owning on SEC Form 13F, how much the directors and executive officers hold (and how much of the vote they control), and roughly how much is left for individual investors. Shown next to beta so the holder mix can be read alongside how much the stock swings.

Institutions, insiders and everyone else, 13F holdings as of 2026-06-30

“Everyone else” is what remains after shares reported on Form 13F and shares held by directors and executive officers: mostly individual investors, plus non-insider families or foundations and smaller or foreign institutions. The figures have different dates and 13F reports count some shares twice — read it as an approximate split.

Held by 13F filers
88.0%
Directors & officers (shares)
—
Everyone else (est.)
12.0%

individuals and other non-13F holders

Directors & officers (voting power)
—

no proxy statement yet

Institutional-ownership rank
223 of 416

1 = most institutional; 53% of covered companies have more

Beta (adjusted)
0.83

above 1 = swings more than the market

  • 259.5M shares reported by 2,018 13F filers ÷ 294.8M shares outstanding on 2026-07-24. Option positions are excluded.
  • A large “everyone else” share can still reflect a family, trust or foundation stake held outside the board; check the proxy statement’s 5% holders.

Sources: SEC Form 13F data set (holdings as of 2026-06-30) · Form 10-Q cover page (shares outstanding as of 2026-07-24)

20

Strengths & weaknessesSite analysis

Strengths

  1. 1. Margin expansion

    Operating margin rose from 32% (2023) to 42% (2025).

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  2. 2. Earnings growth

    Net income $4,471M in 2025 vs $2,626M in 2023.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  3. 3. Dividend growth

    Dividend per share rose from $2.68 (2020) to $3.84 (2025).

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

Weaknesses

  1. 1. Debt-market dependence

    Ratings revenue depends on issuance.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  2. 2. Higher debt

    Debt rose to $13,088M in 2025.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

21

What draws investors to itSite analysis

Why the stock can look attractive to investors — each point paired with what has to hold for it to stay true, and the opposing view. This is this site's analysis, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

P/E (FY2025)

33.7x

Price at fiscal year-end ÷ diluted EPS

Dividend yield (FY2025)

0.78%

Dividends per share ÷ fiscal year-end price

Payout ratio (FY2025)

26%

Dividends per share ÷ diluted EPS

FCF yield (FY2025)

3.7%

(Operating CF − capex) ÷ market cap

  1. 1. Essential benchmarks

    Ratings and indices are 42% of 2025 revenue combined.

    What has to hold
    Markets stay active.
    The other side
    Issuance swings.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  2. 2. Focus

    Spun off Mobility.

    What has to hold
    Focus lifts growth.
    The other side
    Separation costs.

    Evidence: Form 8-K (2026-07-02) — Items 1.01, 2.01 Mobility Global separation

22

ResilienceSite analysisShow

How well the company could absorb a bad year: its financial buffer, how its revenue and profit held up in the worst year on record, and what the 10-K says about the business's exposure to shocks. Figures and filing statements only — no overall rating.

1. Financial buffer (FY2025)

Cash & short-term investments ÷ debt due within a year

2.5x

$1.8B vs. $718M

Interest coverage (operating income ÷ interest expense)

22.6x

$6.48B vs. $287M

Free cash flow ÷ dividends paid

4.7x

$5.46B vs. $1.17B (FCF = operating CF − capex)

2. Worst year in the record, and the recovery

FigureWorst year-over-year changeBack to the prior level?
RevenueNo decline in the record—
Operating income-18.7% in FY2023 ($4.94B → $4.02B)Yes, by FY2024

Covers only the 6 fiscal years on record (FY2020–FY2025), which may not include a full recession — the worst year here isn’t necessarily how the company would fare in a severe downturn.

3. Business resilience (from the 10-K)

  • 2020

    Net income of $2,339M in 2020.

    Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)

24

Risks (including geopolitical)Site analysis

Starting from the 10-K's Risk Factors section, organized by category — geopolitical, currency, raw materials, regulatory, disaster, and more — with impact and likelihood assessed by this site.

Risk map

Vertical = impact on results, horizontal = likelihood. Upper right = most severe. Numbers match the list below (placement is this site’s own assessment).

Impact
High
2
Med
35
1
Low
4
LowMedHigh

Likelihood →

"Company disclosure" vs. "this site’s assessment"

The description and mitigation for each risk are this site’s summary of the 10-K’s "Risk Factors" section. Impact and likelihood are this site’s own assessment, not the company’s — where the company discloses its own likelihood assessment, that is noted in the summary.

Impact is judged from how large the affected business is relative to total revenue/profit, and from the risk’s track record of moving results in the past. Likelihood is judged from the filing’s wording and the current business environment (already occurring, or recurring). See the rating criteria.

  1. 1Competition & technology shift

    New products

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    Failure to innovate against competitors could hurt results.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    In order to maintain a competitive position, we invest in innovation, new offerings and enhancements, including new ways to deliver our products and services.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact Med / Likelihood High
  2. 2Demand & macro

    Debt issuance

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    Ratings revenue varies with market conditions.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    Not stated in the filings.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact High / Likelihood Med
  3. 3Law & regulation

    Ratings regulation

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    Ratings are subject to regulators and inquiries.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    Not stated in the filings.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact Med / Likelihood Med
  4. 4M&A & integration

    Portfolio change

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    Mobility separation and With Intelligence integration.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    Not stated in the filings.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact Low / Likelihood Med
  5. 5Information security

    Data and systems

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    Data and technology are central to its services.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    Central to this organization is our cyber incident response team, which is responsible for the Company’s protection, detection and response capabilities.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact Med / Likelihood Med

25

What changed in the risk factorsFrom SEC data

Paragraphs in the latest 10-K's Risk Factors that have little overlap with the year before, and paragraphs that were dropped.

New or substantially reworded (8)

  • • AI technologies used in our products and processes may incorporate or reproduce third-party content in their outputs, which may expose us to risks associated with infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating others’ intellectual property rights, including the trademarks, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties, including from our competitors or nonpracticing entities which may expose us to protracted and expensive litigation and may materially and adversely affect our business going forward. We may also be unable to protect our data from unintended use or access by third-party AI systems.

  • • Our approach for managing our clients’ use of our data is influenced by AI. Read more

    Our approach must effectively balance protecting our data and enabling our clients to leverage our data for their needs. Given the evolving nature of AI, at this time we are unable to predict if our approach will be successful. If our approach is ultimately inadequate, we could materially dilute the value of our data and/or lose significant market share or revenue.

  • Our inability to adequately obtain, protect and maintain our intellectual property and other proprietary rights could impact our competitive position.

  • • We consider many of our products and services to be proprietary, and our success depends, in part, on protecting our intellectual property, proprietary information, and technology. Read more

    We rely on a variety of measures to maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property portfolio, including trademark and patent protection, trade secret laws, legal misappropriation doctrines, confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, all of which provide only limited protection. In particular, such measures may not prevent infringement, violation, misuse or misappropriation of our intellectual property rights or proprietary or confidential information. For example, we routinely face unauthorized use of our indices and price assessments, and our efforts to stop such uses require significant time and expense, and are not always successful.

  • • There can be no assurance that any future patent, trademark, or other intellectual property registrations will be issued for our pending or future applications or that any of our current or future patents, trademarks or other intellectual property rights will be valid, enforceable, sufficiently broad in scope, provide adequate protection of our technology or other proprietary rights, or provide us with any competitive advantage. Any additional investment in protecting our intellectual property rights through additional trademark, patent or other intellectual property filings could be time consuming and expensive, both in terms of application and maintenance costs. We make business decisions about whether and where to seek patent, copyright, and trademark protection for a particular technology and when to rely upon trade secret protection, and the approach we select may ultimately…

  • • We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in maintaining, protecting, or enforcing the confidentiality of our trade secrets or that our confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements for such trade secrets will provide sufficient protection of our trade secrets, know-how, or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation, or other disclosure. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret or know-how is difficult, fact-intensive, expensive, and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, trade secrets and know-how can be difficult to protect and some courts inside and outside the U.S. are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets and know-how. Further, these agreements do not prevent our competitors from independently developing product or service offerings that are…

  • our competitive position would be materially and adversely harmed. Read more

    The loss of trade secret protection could make it easier for third parties to compete with our products and services by copying functionality, and pervasive data leakage could render our capabilities redundant over time.

  • We have been, and may in the future be, subject to intellectual property disputes, which are costly to defend and could harm our business and operating results.

No longer in the text (4)

  • • In addition, a number of our customers entrust us with storing and securing their data and information on our servers. Read more

    Although we have disaster recovery plans that include backup facilities for our primary data centers, our systems are not always fully redundant, and our disaster planning may not always be sufficient or effective. As such, these disruptions may affect our ability to store, handle and secure such data and information.

  • • On May 30, 2024, we experienced an outage caused by an erroneous internal modification of code in an enterprise technology tool. Read more

    The outage resulted in loss of access to a significant amount of our products and services for various periods of time, ranging from approximately 1 hour to approximately 52 hours. Although this outage did not have a material adverse effect on the Company, it called our attention to certain deficiencies in our controls and system architecture. While we have taken steps to address these deficiencies, we may experience outages or other disruptions in the future, and such outages or disruptions may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

  • • Failure to comply with privacy and data protection requirements could result in significant penalties. Read more

    The EU’s comprehensive General Data Privacy Regulation (“GDPR”), for example, is a comprehensive regulation applying across all EU member states, providing for penalties of up to the greater of €20 million or 4% of worldwide revenue, and the average GDPR penalties increased in 2023 compared to prior years.

  • ◦ increases in taxes or changes in U.S. or foreign tax laws (for example, the Pillar Two international tax framework established by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which includes a global minimum tax of 15%),

7 more paragraphs differ; the filings below have the full text.

Matched automatically, quoted as filed, and may include rewording of an existing risk. Compares Item 1A of the 10-K filed Feb 11, 2026 ↗ with the 10-K filed Feb 11, 2025 ↗.

26

What to watch going forwardSite analysis

  • Revenue after Mobility.
  • Issuance volumes.
  • Australian class action.

27

Source documentsShow

This page's financial figures come from the Form 10-Ks listed below. Check the original filings for full detail.

Last updated

Analysis last edited: November 6, 2026 · Financial data fetched: November 4, 2026 15:28 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: February 11, 2026

Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-02-11Proxy statement (2026)

Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.

This page is this site’s own analysis based on public information, and does not represent S&P Global’s views. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and this site does not guarantee the accuracy of any figure or statement here. Always verify against the original source documents before making an investment decision.