NYSE: LH · Health Care Services
Labcorp
Labcorp, based in Burlington, North Carolina, is a global leader in laboratory services: its nearly 71,000 employees performed more than 750 million tests in 2025 and served clients in about 100 countries. It reports two segments — Diagnostics Laboratories ($10,877 million of 2025 revenue), which runs testing labs, more than 2,200 patient service centers and over 7,000 in-office phlebotomists in the U.S. and Canada, and Biopharma Laboratory Services ($3,098 million), which supported about 85% of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2025. After spinning off its clinical development business as Fortrea in June 2023, revenue grew to $13,952 million in 2025 and net income to $876 million. It keeps buying hospital outreach lab businesses (e.g., BioReference and Community Health Systems assets in 2025) and returned $450 million through buybacks plus $241 million of dividends in 2025.
Last updated
Analysis last edited: October 31, 2026 · Financial data fetched: October 27, 2026 15:52 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: February 24, 2026
Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-02-2410-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) · filed 2026-10-30Proxy statement (2026)
Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.
01
At a glanceFrom SEC data
Eight headline measures, each placed among the companies covered on this site.
- Revenue growthCAGRSmooths out year-to-year swings into "grew X% a year on average." Makes growth pace comparable across companies of very different sizes.
- 1.5%
- Operating marginOperating marginHow many cents of operating profit are left per dollar of revenue. Reflects pricing power and cost structure.
- 9.9%
- ROIC minus WACCROIC − WACC spreadThe difference between ROIC and WACC. Consistently positive implies value creation; consistently negative implies value destruction.
- +0.6 pts
- Net debt ÷ EBITDAEBITDAOperating income with D&A added back. A rough proxy for cash-generating power that’s less distorted by capital intensity, depreciation method, or financing/tax differences than net income.
- 2.4x
- Cash conversionOperating CF ÷ net income (cash conversion)How much of reported profit shows up as actual cash. 1x or higher means profit is backed by cash.
- 1.87x
- Dividend raisesDividend per shareTotal annual dividend paid per share (sum of all declared payments for the year).
- 0 of 5
- P/E todayP/EShare price ÷ EPS — how many years of current earnings the stock price represents. This site uses the period-end figure as reported in the filing.
- 29.3x
- Betaβ (beta)How much a stock moves, on average, for a 1% move in the overall market. Above 1 means more volatile than the market, which raises the return shareholders require. This site computes it from about 2.5 years (roughly 130 weeks) of weekly returns, built from Yahoo Finance daily prices, regressed against an S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy, then applies the well-known long-run mean-reversion adjustment (0.67 × β + 0.33) as the WACC default.
- 0.51
Higher than 8% of 372 non-financial companies
Average yearly growth over the years shown
Higher than 25% of 311 non-financial companies
Latest fiscal year (FY2025)
Higher than 36% of 311 non-financial companies
Return on capital above (or below) its estimated cost
Higher than 64% of 304 non-financial companies
Below 0 means more cash than debt
Higher than 67% of 349 non-financial companies
Operating cash flow ÷ net income
Years the dividend per share rose, of the last 5
Latest close 2026-11-04; trailing 12 months to 2026-09-30
Above 1 = moves more than the market
Each marker shows where this company sits among the non-financial companies covered on this site, not all listed companies (left = lowest, right = highest). A high position is not automatically good — for net debt ÷ EBITDA, higher means more debt. Details and formulas are in the sections below and in How to read this.
02
Valuation todayFrom SEC data
Price-based measures at the latest close, next to the same measures at the last fiscal year-end.
Share price$358.30close on 2026-11-04
Market cap$29.45B
- P/EP/EShare price ÷ EPS — how many years of current earnings the stock price represents. This site uses the period-end figure as reported in the filing. today
- 29.3x
- P/BP/BShare price ÷ book value per share. Below 1x means the market values the company below its accounting net worth. This site uses the closing price nearest the fiscal year-end and highlights sub-1x readings. today
- 3.4x
- EV/EBITDAEV/EBITDAEnterprise value (≈ market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash) as a multiple of EBITDA — roughly, "how many years of EBITDA to buy the whole company." Lower is generally viewed as cheaper, and it’s more comparable than P/E across companies with different debt loads or depreciation policies. This site excludes noncontrolling interests from the EV calculation. today
- 16.7x
- FCF yieldFree cash flow (FCF)Operating CF minus capital expenditures — cash generated by the business after funding its own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. Acquisitions and securities purchases (also in investing CF) are not subtracted, so FCF can be positive in a year when total investing CF exceeds operating CF. today
- 4.1%
- Dividend yieldDividend per shareTotal annual dividend paid per share (sum of all declared payments for the year). today
- 0.8%
At FY2025 year-end: 24.0x
Earnings: trailing 12 months to 2026-09-30
At FY2025 year-end: 2.4x
Book value at FY2025 year-end
At FY2025 year-end: 12.4x
EBITDA for FY2025
At FY2025 year-end: 5.8%
Free cash flow for FY2025
Dividends per share for FY2025
“Today” uses the latest closing price (2026-11-04, Yahoo Finance daily closing prices) and shares outstanding at the last fiscal year-end. The rest of this page — including the financial table and ROIC vs. WACC — uses fiscal year-end prices. These are reference figures, not a judgment of whether the stock is cheap or expensive.
03
What changed since last earningsFrom SEC data
The latest reported quarter against the same quarter a year earlier, the balance sheet against the previous quarter-end, and what management said in its latest earnings release.
Quarter ended Sep 30, 2026.
- Revenue$3.56B → $3.81B (vs. a year earlier)↑ +6.9%$3.56B → $3.81B (vs. a year earlier)
- Operating margin11.1% → 10.6% (vs. a year earlier)↓ −0.6 pts11.1% → 10.6% (vs. a year earlier)
- Net income$261M → $263M (vs. a year earlier)↑ +0.7%$261M → $263M (vs. a year earlier)
- Diluted EPS$3.12 → $3.22 (vs. a year earlier)↑ +3.2%$3.12 → $3.22 (vs. a year earlier)
- Cash$142M → $262M (vs. previous quarter-end)↑ +84.6%$142M → $262M (vs. previous quarter-end)
- Long-term debt$5.86B → $5.85B (vs. previous quarter-end)→ −0.1%$5.86B → $5.85B (vs. previous quarter-end)
Source: Form 10-Q ↗ (SEC XBRL). Long-term debt is the tagged long-term debt figure and leaves out short-term borrowings.
From the earnings release of Oct 28, 2026.
Management outlook • Issued
Updating 2026 full-year guidance. Source sentence
Labcorp is updating 2026 full year guidance to reflect its third quarter performance and full year outlook.
Key changes
Quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Source sentence
On October 21, 2026, the company announced a quarterly cash dividend of $0.72 per share of common stock, payable on December 11, 2026, to stockholders of record at the close of business on November 24, 2026.
$1.4B left under its repurchase program. Source sentence
The company has $1.4 billion remaining under its board-authorized share repurchase program, providing continued flexibility to return capital to shareholders.
Written by AI. A line appears only if its figures and direction match the quoted sentence, which an automatic check confirms. Companies' outlooks are their own and may not be met. Read the release ↗
04
Company profileFrom SEC dataShow
- Legal name
- LABCORP HOLDINGS INC.
- Headquarters
- BURLINGTON, NC
- Fiscal year end
- 12/31
- Exchange & ticker
- NYSE: LH
- Industry
- Health Care Services
- CIK
- 920148
- Website
- https://www.labcorp.com/ ↗
- IR page
- https://ir.labcorp.com/ ↗
Workforce (as of FY2025 year-end)
Employees
71,000
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) cover page and business description
05
Earnings calendarFrom SEC dataShow
When the company reports each quarter: the quarter-end date, the day results were released, and when the 10-Q or 10-K was filed.
Next report
Q4 FY2026
Quarter end: December 2026. In past years, Q4 results were released 37–48 days after quarter end (Feb 17, 2026; Feb 6, 2025; Feb 15, 2024). No date has been announced in the sources this site uses.
Reporting pattern
- Fiscal year ends around December 31.
- Reports four times a year: three quarterly reports (10-Q) and an annual report (10-K) for Q4.
- Earnings releases came 24–48 days after quarter end over the last 12 quarters.
| Quarter | Quarter ended | Earnings release (8-K) | Report filed (10-Q / 10-K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 FY2026 | Sep 30, 2026 | Oct 28, 2026 (+28 days) | Oct 30, 2026 10-Q (+30 days) |
| Q2 FY2026 | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 (+30 days) | Aug 5, 2026 10-Q (+36 days) |
| Q1 FY2026 | Mar 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 (+30 days) | May 4, 2026 10-Q (+34 days) |
| Q4 FY2025 | Dec 31, 2025 | Feb 17, 2026 (+48 days) | Feb 24, 2026 10-K (+55 days) |
| Q3 FY2025 | Sep 30, 2025 | Oct 28, 2025 (+28 days) | Oct 31, 2025 10-Q (+31 days) |
| Q2 FY2025 | Jun 30, 2025 | Jul 24, 2025 (+24 days) | Aug 1, 2025 10-Q (+32 days) |
| Q1 FY2025 | Mar 31, 2025 | Apr 29, 2025 (+29 days) | Apr 29, 2025 10-Q (+29 days) |
| Q4 FY2024 | Dec 31, 2024 | Feb 6, 2025 (+37 days) | Feb 25, 2025 10-K (+56 days) |
| Q3 FY2024 | Sep 30, 2024 | Oct 24, 2024 (+24 days) | Oct 29, 2024 10-Q (+29 days) |
| Q2 FY2024 | Jun 30, 2024 | Aug 1, 2024 (+32 days) | Aug 2, 2024 10-Q (+33 days) |
| Q1 FY2024 | Mar 31, 2024 | Apr 25, 2024 (+25 days) | Apr 30, 2024 10-Q (+30 days) |
| Q4 FY2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | Feb 15, 2024 (+46 days) | Feb 26, 2024 10-K (+57 days) |
Source: SEC EDGAR filing history. Release dates are the dates the earnings release was furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K (Item 2.02), which is normally the day results are announced. For a quarter whose 10-Q or 10-K isn’t filed yet, the date is the latest Item 2.02 8-K since the previous report, which may be a preliminary or other results-related update. Fiscal years are labeled by the calendar year in which they end.
06
Flagship products & servicesSite analysis
Dx
Routine and specialty diagnostics
Core and specialty tests incl. genetics (Invitae) and oncology.
Dx
Hospital outreach lab acquisitions
Acquisitions of hospital lab outreach businesses such as BioReference Health and Community Health Systems assets.
BLS
Central laboratory and early development
Lab testing for clinical trials and preclinical drug development.
From the Form 10-K, FY2025.
U.S., worldwide and country/regional share of flagship products/services
Only shares the company itself states (in its filings or press releases, sometimes citing a research firm) are shown. Scope and timing vary by figure — treat these as approximate.
Drug development lab support
FDA new drug approvals
U.S. share
—
Not disclosedWorldwide share
≈85% of 2025 approvals supported
Company-disclosedBLS supported approximately 85% of new drugs and therapeutic products approved by the FDA in 2025.
07
Recent strategic focusSite analysis
Recent developments.
Hospital outreach deals
Acquired BioReference Health assets and Community Health Systems outreach assets in 2025; Parkview deal expected to close in 2026.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Post-Fortrea focus
Spun off its clinical development business as Fortrea in June 2023 to focus on Dx and BLS.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Q3 2026
Revenue $3.81B (+6.9%); diluted EPS $3.22 (+3.3%), adjusted $4.78 (+14.5%). Labcorp raised 2026 adjusted EPS guidance to $18.30–18.70, announced or closed four acquisitions, and won FDA approval of PGDx elio tissue complete as a melanoma companion diagnostic.
Source: Q3 2026 earnings release
Capex ÷ D&A (FY2025)
0.64x
Below depreciation — investment is being pared back
formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization
e.g.$435M ÷ $681M = 0.64x
termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
M&A spend (5-year total)
$3.75B
Latest year: $582M
Cash-flow-statement spending on acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Where the money goes, over time
Unit: $M. Capex went from $422M in FY2021 to $435M in FY2025
- Capex
- M&A spend
formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization
termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24
08
Key figures at a glanceFrom SEC data
FY2021–FY2025, 5 years.
Revenue (FY2025)
$13.95B
As reported in the 10-K
Revenue CAGR (4 years)
+1.5%
formula(last-period revenue ÷ first-period revenue) ^ (1 ÷ years) − 1
e.g.($13,952M ÷ $13,136M) ^ (1÷4) − 1 = 1.5%
termsCAGR · ^ (exponent) · Revenue (net sales)
Operating margin (FY2025)
9.9%▼caution
-13.3pt vs. 4 years ago
formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100
e.g.$1,385M ÷ $13,952M × 100 = 9.9%
ROE (FY2025)
10.5%▲favorable
5-year average: 12.2%
As reported in the 10-K
P/B (FY2025 end)
2.39x
formulafiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share
e.g.$250.88 ÷ $104.86 = 2.39x
Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's P/B
EV/EBITDA (FY2025 end)
12.4x
formula(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization)
e.g.($20,622M + $5,585M − $532M) ÷ ($1,385M + $681M) = 12.4x
termsEV/EBITDA · Market capitalization · Interest-bearing debt · EBITDA · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's multiple
- ―
Revenue grew +1.5% a year over 4 years (modest growth)
From $13.14B in FY2021 to $13.95B in FY2025. The annualized rate (CAGR) makes it possible to compare growth pace across companies of different sizes.
- ▼
Operating margin declined: 23.2% → 9.9%
How much operating profit is left per $100 of revenue. It moved -13.3 points over 4 years — pricing power, cost control, and product mix all show up here.
- ―
Equity ratio is 46.9% (a middling level)
The share of total assets funded by equity rather than debt. 50%+ is often read as low bankruptcy risk, though the right level varies by industry (real estate and leasing run lower, for instance).
- ▲
Free cash flow was positive in 5 of 5 years
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures: the cash left over after funding the business’s own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. A negative year can mean heavy investment, or weak core earnings — worth distinguishing.
- ▲
ROE averaged 12.2% over 5 years (latest: 10.5%)
How much profit was generated on shareholders’ equity. Roughly 10%+ is often cited as solid for a U.S. company, though this varies a lot by industry and capital intensity.
09
Business modelSite analysis
Business Model Canvas
The whole company in nine blocks. Left side: how it delivers (partners, activities, resources, costs). Right side: who it serves and how it earns. Every entry comes from the company’s filings shown on this page.
08 · who helps
Key partners
No partners or suppliers named in the filings.
07 · what it does
Key activities
- Diagnostics Laboratories (Dx): routine and specialty testing
- Biopharma Laboratory Services (BLS): central lab and early development
06 · what it draws on
Key resources
- Nearly 71,000 employees in 17 countries
- Laboratory network, 2,200+ patient service centers, 7,000+ in-office phlebotomists
- Scientific and test menu breadth
02 · why customers buy
Value propositions
- Diagnostic testing and central labs for drug development across a broad portfolio of capabilities.
04 · how it keeps them
Customer relationships
- Marketing, sales and customer service functions that support customer acquisition and retention; contracts with payers.
03 · how it reaches them
Channels
- Patient service centers, physician and hospital orders, and biopharma contracts.
01 · who it serves
Customer segments
- Physicians, hospitals, health systems, insurers, Medicare/Medicaid and patients
- Pharmaceutical and biotech companies
09 · where money goes
Cost structure
FY2025, share of revenue ($13.95B)
- Cost of revenue71.2%
- Selling, general & administrative15.9%
- Other operating costs2.9%
Operating profit left: 9.9% of revenue. Depreciation & amortization (inside the costs above): $681M. Capital spending: $435M.
Source: Form 10-K income statement and cash-flow statement (SEC XBRL).
05 · how money comes in
Revenue streams
- Diagnostics Laboratories $10,877M (2025)
- Biopharma Laboratory Services $3,098M
Value propositions, channels and customer relationships: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Performs diagnostic tests ordered by doctors and hospitals and paid by insurers, patients and government programs, and runs central lab and early development testing for pharmaceutical and biotech companies.
01 what it draws on
Inputs & resources
- Nearly 71,000 employees in 17 countries
- Laboratory network, 2,200+ patient service centers, 7,000+ in-office phlebotomists
- Scientific and test menu breadth
02 what it does
Activities
- Diagnostics Laboratories (Dx): routine and specialty testing
- Biopharma Laboratory Services (BLS): central lab and early development
03 who it serves
Customers
- Physicians, hospitals, health systems, insurers, Medicare/Medicaid and patients
- Pharmaceutical and biotech companies
04 how money comes in
How it earns
- Diagnostics Laboratories $10,877M (2025)
- Biopharma Laboratory Services $3,098M
How the business makes money
- About 87% of revenue from North America, 9% Europe, 4% other.
- Dx payers 2025: clients 23%, patients 10% and others incl. managed care and Medicare/Medicaid.
- Expects to buy select lab assets from Parkview in 2026.
Government & regulation around the business
Non-market factors from the company’s filings: what governments and regulators fund, buy, set, approve or restrict, and which part of the flow above each one touches.
Labcorp’s Medicare lab rates are cut under PAMA, with reductions frozen for now.
Regulated prices & reimbursement
Government reimbursement
PAMA has reduced Medicare rates for many tests, with further cuts expected though currently frozen.
Constrains the businessTouches: How it earnsSource: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Approvals & licenses
FDA drug development support
Supported more than 85% of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2025.
Supports the businessTouches: CustomersSource: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Revenue by segment (FY2025)
Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue
Diagnostics Laboratories
10,876.5 (78%)Biopharma Laboratory Services
3,098.2 (22%)
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) Segment revenues before intercompany eliminations; total revenues $13,952M.
10
Contract structureSite analysisShow
Short-term or spot sales carry different earnings quality than long-term or auto-renewing contracts — this shows how the company actually contracts with its customers.
11
Customers & suppliersSite analysis
Who the company sells to and buys from. Companies rarely name either, so named counterparties come only from the company's own filings and press releases; otherwise this lists the concentration figures the 10-K discloses.
Customers
Physicians, hospitals, payers, patients and biopharma companies.
Named by the company
No single customer is material.
Suppliers
Lab equipment and reagent suppliers.
Named by the company
No material supplier is named.
12
Competitors & peersSite analysis
Competitors the 10-K names, and the peer group the company itself chose in its proxy statement. Nothing here is this site's own pick.
The 10-K describes a fragmented market of hospital, physician-office and independent labs without naming competitors.
Competitors named in the 10-K
Peer group the company chose
Compensation peer group, from the proxy statement. Peers are companies the board considers comparable — for example when setting executive pay — not necessarily direct competitors.
2025 peer group from the 2026 proxy statement.
- Agilent Technologiessite ↗
- Baxter Internationalsite ↗
- Becton Dickinsonsite ↗
- Boston Scientificsite ↗
- Charles River Laboratoriessite ↗
- Edwards Lifesciencessite ↗
- Henry Scheinsite ↗
- Hologicsite ↗
- Molina Healthcaresite ↗
- Quest Diagnosticssite ↗
- Strykersite ↗
- Tenet Healthcaresite ↗
- Universal Health Servicessite ↗
- Viatrissite ↗
- Zimmer Biometsite ↗
Company names link to this site’s analysis where one exists; “site ↗” opens the company’s own website.
13
Six years of financialsFrom SEC data
Each chart's axis holds a single unit (never mixing dollars, %, and $/share). The table's per-period header links to the filing the numbers came from.
Revenue over time
Unit: $M
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24
Profit over time (operating → net)
Unit: $M
- Operating income
- Pretax income
- Net income
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24
Margins over time
Unit: %
- Operating margin
- Net margin
formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100
formulanet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100
Cash flow over time
Unit: $M (below zero = cash went out)
- Operating CF
- Investing CF
- Free CF
formulacash flow from operations − capital expenditures
termsFree cash flow (FCF) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Capital expenditures (capex)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24
Financial stability & capital efficiency
Unit: %
- Equity ratio
- ROE
formulatotal equity ÷ total assets × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)
termsStockholders’ equity · Total assets
formulanet income ÷ average equity (beginning + ending, ÷2) × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)
termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Stockholders’ equity
Earnings per share (EPS) and dividend per share
Unit: $
- EPS
- Dividend per share
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24
| Line item | FY202110-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202210-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202310-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202410-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202510-K on EDGAR ↗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement ($M) | |||||
| Revenue | 13,136 | 11,864 | 12,162 | 13,009 | 13,952 |
| Operating income | 3,049 | 1,437 | 726 | 1,087 | 1,385 |
| Pretax income | 2,888 | 1,237 | 569 | 960 | 1,108 |
| Net income (attributable) | 2,377 | 1,279 | 418 | 746 | 877 |
| Revenue growthcalc(this year’s revenue − last year’s revenue) ÷ last year’s revenue × 100 | — | -9.7% | 2.5% | 7.0% | 7.2% |
| Operating margincalcoperating income ÷ revenue × 100 | 23.2% | 12.1% | 6.0% | 8.4% | 9.9% |
| Net margincalcnet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100 | 18.1% | 10.8% | 3.4% | 5.7% | 6.3% |
| Balance sheet ($M) | |||||
| Total assets | 20,385 | 20,155 | 16,725 | 18,379 | 18,393 |
| Total equity | 10,273 | 10,097 | 7,875 | 8,052 | 8,620 |
| Interest-bearing debtSum of short- and long-term borrowings, notes/bonds payable | 5,417 | 5,039 | 4,055 | 6,332 | 5,585 |
| Equity ratio | 50.4% | 50.1% | 47.1% | 43.8% | 46.9% |
| ROE | 24.1% | 12.6% | 4.7% | 9.4% | 10.5% |
| Cash flow ($M) | |||||
| Operating CF | 3,110 | 1,956 | 1,328 | 1,586 | 1,641 |
| Investing CF | -885 | -1,652 | -1,171 | -1,367 | -1,194 |
| Financing CF | -2,066 | -1,322 | -59 | 780 | -1,457 |
| Free cash flowcalccash flow from operations − capital expenditures | 2,688 | 1,527 | 874 | 1,096 | 1,206 |
| Cash and equivalents | 1,473 | 321 | 537 | 1,519 | 532 |
| Per share & other | |||||
| EPS ($) | 24.39 | 13.97 | 4.77 | 8.84 | 10.46 |
| BVPS ($) | 110.35 | 114.47 | 93.86 | 96.55 | 104.86 |
| Dividend per share ($) | — | 2.16 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 |
| Payout ratiocalcdividend per share ÷ diluted EPS × 100 | — | 15.5% | 60.4% | 32.6% | 27.5% |
| P/E (x) | 11.1 | 14.5 | 47.7 | 25.9 | 24.0 |
| EV/EBITDA (x)calc(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization) | 8.0 | 11.4 | 17.3 | 13.8 | 12.4 |
| P/B (x)calcfiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share | 2.45 | 1.77 | 2.42 | 2.38 | 2.39 |
P/B and EV/EBITDA use each period’s period-end (fiscal year-end) figures, not the current share price. Figures without a "calc" tag are as reported in the Form 10-K (the consolidated financial statements and, for older years, earlier 10-Ks), pulled automatically from SEC EDGAR. Where a later filing restated a prior period, the restated figure is used.
Last 8 quarters
Three-month figures from 10-Q filings. Change is versus the same quarter a year earlier. Newest quarter on top.
| Quarter ended | Revenue | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | $3.81B+6.9% | $402M+1.4% | $263M+0.7% | $3.22 |
| 2026-06-30 | $3.73B+5.8% | $452M+14.5% | $299M+25.6% | $3.64 |
| 2026-03-31 | $3.54B+5.8% | $381M+16.8% | $278M+30.5% | $3.35 |
| 2025-12-31 † | $3.52B+5.6% | $268M+23.6% | $165M+14.9% | — |
| 2025-09-30 | $3.56B | $397M | $261M | $3.12 |
| 2025-06-30 | $3.53B | $395M | $238M | $2.84 |
| 2025-03-31 | $3.35B | $326M | $213M | $2.52 |
| 2024-12-31 † | $3.33B | $217M | $143M | — |
† Fourth quarter = the 10-K’s annual figure minus the first three quarters; quarterly EPS isn’t derived this way because share counts change during the year.
Data left out of this analysis
- FY2020: FY2020 figures include the clinical development business spun off as Fortrea in June 2023 and were not restated, so they are not comparable.
14
Is ROIC above WACC?From SEC data
ROIC (the return on money invested in the business) above WACC (the cost of raising that money) means the company is creating value. WACC is an estimate, so its assumptions can be adjusted below.
ROIC (FY2025)
7.4%
formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)
e.g.$1,385M × (1 − 24%) ÷ $14,294M × 100 = 7.4%
termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity
WACC (this site’s estimate)
6.75%
formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight
e.g.Equity weight: $20.62B ÷ ($20.62B + $5.58B) = 78.7%
e.g.Debt weight: $5.58B ÷ ($20.62B + $5.58B) = 21.3%
e.g.WACC: 7.8% × 78.7% + 4.0% × (1 − 24%) × 21.3% = 6.75%
termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization
How firm is this? With the equity risk premium ±1 point and beta ±0.2, WACC runs 5.6%–8.2% and ROIC − WACC runs −0.8 to +1.7 points. The sign flips inside this range, so the result depends on the assumptions. This describes the latest year and does not predict future value creation.
WACC 6.75% is this site’s estimate under the assumptions below (not a figure the company has published)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.95% (10-year Treasury, 2026-11-03)
- β
- 0.51 (price-derived adjusted beta, but correlation with the market is low (R² 0.03), so reliability is limited)
- Equity risk premium
- 5.5%
- Cost of equity
- 7.76%
- Cost of debt
- 4.01%
- Tax rate
- 24% (effective rate, FY2023–FY2025)
- Capital structure (equity : debt)
- 79% : 21%
ROIC over time, vs. WACC
Unit: % — bars = each period's ROIC, horizontal line = latest WACC. Bars above the line are green, below are red
- ROIC (above WACC)
- ROIC (below WACC)
- WACC 6.75%
formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)
termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity
formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight
termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization
Try different WACC assumptions
β and the equity risk premium are estimates with a real range of plausible values — move the sliders to check whether ROIC > WACC still holds. The risk-free rate starts at the 10-year Treasury yield on 2026-11-03 (U.S. Treasury).
Initial β: 0.51 (price-derived adjusted beta. Raw β 0.27, R² 0.03, 130 weeks)
formula0.67 × β + 0.33 (β = the slope of weekly stock returns regressed on weekly market returns)
e.g.0.67 × 0.266 + 0.33 = 0.508
termsβ (beta)
Period 2024-05-10–2026-11-04, using S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy. Source: Yahoo Finance price history.
formularisk-free rate + β × equity risk premium
e.g.5.0% + 0.51 × 5.5% = 7.8%
termsCAPM · Risk-free rate · β (beta) · Equity risk premium (market risk premium)
formulafiscal year-end closing price × shares outstanding (= market cap)
formulainterest expense ÷ interest-bearing debt × 100 (clamped to 0–10%; falls back to the risk-free rate if there’s no debt)
15
What the price implies (DCF)From SEC data
A company's value can be written as its free cash flow divided by (cost of capital − perpetual growth). Working that backwards from the market's valuation shows how much growth the share price assumed — compared here with the company's actual past growth.
Growth the price implies (price on 2026-11-04)
3.3%
Perpetual FCF growth: g = r − FCF ÷ EV = 6.8% − 3.5%
Past FCF growth (FY2021–FY2025)
-18.2%
Compound annual rate, 4 years
Past revenue growth (FY2021–FY2025)
+1.5%
Compound annual rate, 4 years
Inputs (FY2025): free cash flow $1.21B (operating CF − capex); enterprise value $34.5B = market cap $29.45B (latest close, 2026-11-04) + debt $5.58B − cash and short-term investments $532M; r = WACC of 6.8% using this page’s default assumptions (β 0.51, risk-free 5.0%, market premium 5.5%).
Three WACC scenarios
The same calculation under cautious, base and optimistic cost-of-capital assumptions (risk-free rate fixed at the 10-year Treasury yield). Pick one to load it into the sliders below.
Try your own assumptions
V = FCF ÷ (r − g). It starts at the implied growth rate, where the theoretical value equals today’s enterprise value.
Theoretical enterprise value
$34.46B
FCF $1.21B ÷ (6.8% − 3.3%)
Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value
1.00x
Below 1x: these assumptions value the business below the market did
How sensitive the answer is
Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value for each combination of r and g.
| g \ r | 4.8% | 5.8% | 6.8% | 7.8% | 8.8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0.73x | 0.60x | 0.51x | 0.45x | 0.40x |
| 2% | 1.25x | 0.92x | 0.73x | 0.60x | 0.51x |
| 4% | 4.37x | 1.94x | 1.25x | 0.92x | 0.73x |
| 6% | — | — | 4.37x | 1.94x | 1.25x |
| 8% | — | — | — | — | 4.37x |
A simplified model for seeing what the market price assumes, not a forecast or a target price. It treats free cash flow as growing at one constant rate forever; the result swings widely with small changes in r and g, and is undefined when g reaches r. Free cash flow here is operating cash flow minus capex, which is after interest — a full DCF of enterprise value would use cash flow before interest. Market cap uses the latest close (2026-11-04) × shares at fiscal year-end; free cash flow and WACC inputs are from the latest fiscal year.
16
Earnings qualityFrom SEC dataShow
The same reported profit can mean different things depending on whether it's backed by cash, driven by the core business, or the result of a one-off item. Four checks below.
- ✓
Operating CF ÷ net income: averages 2.00x
Profit is backed by cash coming in.
- ✓
Accrual ratio (latest): -4.2%
A small share of profit rests on accounting estimates.
- ✓
Core-earnings share (operating income ÷ pretax income): 125%
Most profit comes from core operations.
- ✓
Days sales outstanding: 63 → 53 days
No major slowdown in collecting on sales.
Operating CF vs. net income
Unit: $M — operating CF above net income means profit is backed by cash
- Operating CF
- Net income
formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company
termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)
formula(net income − operating CF) ÷ average total assets × 100
termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Total assets
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24
Profit bridge (FY2025)
Unit: $M — what moved profit from operating income to net income
- Profit (each stage)
- Pushed profit up
- Pushed profit down
formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100
termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24
Receivables & inventory days
Unit: days — days grow when receivables or inventory build up faster than sales
- Days sales outstanding
- Days inventory outstanding
formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365
formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365
termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)
Worked examples (latest period)
formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company
e.g.$1,641M ÷ $877M = 1.87x
termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)
formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100
e.g.$1,385M ÷ $1,108M × 100 = 125%
termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)
formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365
e.g.($1,944M + $2,104M) ÷ 2 ÷ $13,952M × 365 = 53 days
formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365
e.g.($493M + $535M) ÷ 2 ÷ $9,939M × 365 = 19 days
termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)
17
Who holds the sharesFrom SEC dataShow
How much of the stock large institutional investors report owning on SEC Form 13F, how much the directors and executive officers hold (and how much of the vote they control), and roughly how much is left for individual investors. Shown next to beta so the holder mix can be read alongside how much the stock swings.
Institutions, insiders and everyone else, 13F holdings as of 2026-06-30
“Everyone else” is what remains after shares reported on Form 13F and shares held by directors and executive officers: mostly individual investors, plus non-insider families or foundations and smaller or foreign institutions. The figures have different dates and 13F reports count some shares twice — read it as an approximate split.
- Held by 13F filers
- 98.0%
- Directors & officers (shares)
- <1%
- Everyone else (est.)
- 2.0%
- Directors & officers (voting power)
- <1%
- Institutional-ownership rank
- 88 of 416
- Beta (adjusted)
- 0.51
individuals and other non-13F holders
no separate voting figure; shown as shares
1 = most institutional; 21% of covered companies have more
above 1 = swings more than the market
- 79.5M shares reported by 1,045 13F filers ÷ 81.1M shares outstanding on 2026-08-04. Option positions are excluded.
- Directors and executive officers as a group, from the proxy statement’s beneficial-ownership table; includes shares they can acquire within 60 days.
- A large “everyone else” share can still reflect a family, trust or foundation stake held outside the board; check the proxy statement’s 5% holders.
Sources: SEC Form 13F data set (holdings as of 2026-06-30) · Form DEF 14A filed 2026-04-10 (beneficial ownership table) · Form 10-Q cover page (shares outstanding as of 2026-08-04)
18
Strengths & weaknessesSite analysis
Strengths
1. Scale and reach
More than 750 million tests in 2025 and support for about 85% of FDA-approved new drugs.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
2. Growing revenue and margins
Revenue up from $12,162M (2023) to $13,952M (2025); SG&A fell to 15.9% of revenue.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
3. Shareholder returns
$450M of buybacks and $241M of dividends in 2025.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Weaknesses
1. Reimbursement exposure
Medicare, Medicaid and managed care pricing affect Dx revenue.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
2. Lower profit than 2021
Net income was $876M in 2025 versus $2,377M in 2021.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
3. Litigation from the AMCA breach
Class action over the 2019 AMCA data breach is being settled.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025) — Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
19
What draws investors to itSite analysis
Why the stock can look attractive to investors — each point paired with what has to hold for it to stay true, and the opposing view. This is this site's analysis, not a recommendation to buy or sell.
P/E (FY2025)
24.0x
Price at fiscal year-end ÷ diluted EPS
Dividend yield (FY2025)
1.15%
Dividends per share ÷ fiscal year-end price
Payout ratio (FY2025)
28%
Dividends per share ÷ diluted EPS
FCF yield (FY2025)
5.8%
(Operating CF − capex) ÷ market cap
1. Steady lab demand
Dx performed more than 750 million tests in 2025 across a broad test menu.
- What has to hold
- Reimbursement stays stable.
- The other side
- Pricing pressure.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
2. Drug development exposure
BLS benefits from biotech and oncology innovation.
- What has to hold
- Biopharma funding recovers.
- The other side
- Cyclical R&D budgets.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
FY2020 is left out because it was not restated for the 2023 Fortrea spin-off.
20
ResilienceSite analysisShow
How well the company could absorb a bad year: its financial buffer, how its revenue and profit held up in the worst year on record, and what the 10-K says about the business's exposure to shocks. Figures and filing statements only — no overall rating.
1. Financial buffer (FY2025)
Cash & short-term investments ÷ debt due within a year
1.1x
$532M vs. $500M
Interest coverage (operating income ÷ interest expense)
6.2x
$1.38B vs. $224M
Free cash flow ÷ dividends paid
5.0x
$1.21B vs. $241M (FCF = operating CF − capex)
2. Worst year in the record, and the recovery
| Figure | Worst year-over-year change | Back to the prior level? |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | -9.7% in FY2022 ($13.14B → $11.86B) | Yes, by FY2025 |
| Operating income | -52.9% in FY2022 ($3.05B → $1.44B) | Not yet, as of FY2025 |
Covers only the 5 fiscal years on record (FY2021–FY2025), which may not include a full recession — the worst year here isn’t necessarily how the company would fare in a severe downturn.
3. Business resilience (from the 10-K)
Profitable every year
Net income stayed positive every year 2021–2025 (lowest $418M in 2023).
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
21
Legal & regulatory mattersSite analysisShow
Lawsuits, government investigations, enforcement actions and settlements the company discloses — where each stands, what is at stake, and what comes next. From the 10-K's Legal Proceedings and contingencies note, the latest 10-Q, and 8-Ks.
Labcorp’s disclosed matters include class actions over the 2019 AMCA vendor data breach (a settlement term sheet was reached in November 2025), a related derivative suit, and Texas Medicaid billing civil investigative demands, plus ordinary-course qui tam and billing matters.
3 open matters · 1 settled or closed
Eugenio derivative suit (Delaware)
PendingLawsuitEugenio v. Berberian et al.
Derivative claims against directors and officers alleging inadequate cybersecurity oversight related to the AMCA incident.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) — Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Texas Medicaid billing CIDs
PendingGovernment investigationState of Texas
Civil Investigative Demands from the Texas Attorney General (2013 and 2018) requesting documents about Texas Medicaid billing.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) — Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Illinois genetic privacy class action (Invitae assets)
PendingClass actionB.W., a minor, et al. v. Invitae Corporation and Labcorp Genetics (N.D. Ill.)
Served July 27, 2026, the suit alleges that Labcorp's purchase of Invitae assets in Invitae's bankruptcy disclosed patients' genetic information without consent under the Illinois Genetic Information Privacy Act, seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief. Labcorp joined a motion to transfer the case to New Jersey for referral to the bankruptcy court.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) — Commitments and Contingencies
AMCA data breach class action (MDL, D.N.J.)
SettledClass actionPatients v. Labcorp
Consolidated class action over the 2019 breach at collections vendor AMCA; parties reached a settlement term sheet on November 25, 2025, subject to a formal agreement and court approval. A class settlement entered March 2, 2026 received final court approval on August 20, 2026, and around September 21, 2026 Labcorp settled with a multistate group of state attorneys general over the AMCA incident.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) — Commitments and Contingencies
Company statement: Other proceedings are described as ordinary-course and not expected to be material.
Based on Form 10-K (FY2025) — Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, reviewed 2026-10-28. Routine ordinary-course claims are not listed. “Major” is this site’s judgment of which matters could materially affect results.
22
Risks (including geopolitical)Site analysis
Starting from the 10-K's Risk Factors section, organized by category — geopolitical, currency, raw materials, regulatory, disaster, and more — with impact and likelihood assessed by this site.
Risk map
Vertical = impact on results, horizontal = likelihood. Upper right = most severe. Numbers match the list below (placement is this site’s own assessment).
Likelihood →
"Company disclosure" vs. "this site’s assessment"
The description and mitigation for each risk are this site’s summary of the 10-K’s "Risk Factors" section. Impact and likelihood are this site’s own assessment, not the company’s — where the company discloses its own likelihood assessment, that is noted in the summary.
Impact is judged from how large the affected business is relative to total revenue/profit, and from the risk’s track record of moving results in the past. Likelihood is judged from the filing’s wording and the current business environment (already occurring, or recurring). See the rating criteria.
- 1Law & regulation
Reimbursement and healthcare regulation
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Changes to Medicare fee schedules, Medicaid billing rules and fraud-and-abuse laws.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact High / Likelihood Med
- 2Competition & technology shift
Competition and consolidation
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Competes with hospital, physician-office and independent labs; consolidation of customers and competitors could shift pricing.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood High
- 3Information security
Patient data security
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- A third-party collections vendor breach (AMCA) led to class actions.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood Med
- 4Demand & macro
Biopharma spending
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- BLS depends on pharma and biotech R&D and clinical trial activity.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood Med
- 5M&A & integration
Acquisitions
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Integration of outreach and specialty lab acquisitions.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Low / Likelihood Med
23
What changed in the risk factorsFrom SEC data
Paragraphs in the latest 10-K's Risk Factors that have little overlap with the year before, and paragraphs that were dropped.
New or substantially reworded (8)
Natural disasters (e.g., severe weather, fires, and earthquakes), geopolitical events (e.g., terrorism, war, and political instability), public health crises, criminal activity, supply chain disruptions, and other events beyond the Company’s control could negatively affect the Company’s operations. These disruptions may temporarily reduce testing volumes, delay study progress, hinder specimen transport, limit access to laboratories and IT systems, and interrupt supply deliveries. They may also affect customer operations, further decreasing demand. Prolonged disruptions caused by such events, especially in key operational locations, could harm the Company’s results of operations.
The Company’s diagnostic testing services are primarily billed to third parties, including MCOs, employer plans, and other health insurance providers. Read more
A shift toward a higher mix of government and MCO payers may adversely effect revenues due to lower reimbursement rates. Ongoing efforts by payers to reduce reimbursement, tighten payment policies, and control utilization are expected to continue. If the Company cannot offset these reductions through cost efficiencies, increased volume or new services, its revenues, profitability, and cash flows may be materially impacted. PAMA has already reduced Medicare reimbursement rates for many tests, and further reductions are expected, although rate reductions are frozen for 2026 and capped at 15% per year for 2027-2029. Delays and changes in coding, billing, and payer policies have historically impacted
revenue and margins, and similar disruptions may continue. Increasing patient cost-sharing and evolving value-based care models also pose collection challenges and may affect the Company’s ability to attract and retain MCOs.
BLS supports pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device companies in navigating the regulatory approval and post-approval compliance requirements process. Read more
Changes in government regulations, whether easing or tightening requirements and changes in government operations, including staff reductions and reorganization efforts, could reduce the demand for BLS’s services or make them less competitive. Additionally, efforts to control drug and device costs, or changes in insurer reimbursement practices, may lead customers to reduce R&D spending, which could adversely affect BLS’s business.
BLS’s revenues are closely tied to R&D spending by pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device companies, which may depend on access to capital and reimbursement from payers. Read more
Economic conditions, industry trends, or funding constraints could lead to reduced or delayed R&D activity or outsourcing, materially impacting BLS’s business and financial performance.
The Company’s quarterly results of operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter making it harder to predict future results.
The Company’s operations rely on the continued performance and security of its information technology systems. Read more
System failures, cybersecurity incidents, disruptions, or other issues affecting information technology systems could impair data processing, service delivery, billing, and customer communications. The Company also relies on third parties for critical services, including transportation, supplies, and data processing and expects them to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including environmental, health and safety, and privacy and data security laws. Failures by these providers, whether operational, legal, or cybersecurity-related, and issues affecting their information technology systems, could disrupt services, compromise personal or other confidential information, expose the Company to liability and could materially impact its business, even if the Company is not…
The Company continues to face cybersecurity threats, including ransomware attempts, data breaches, and phishing and social engineering attempts targeting its systems and its employees, and those of third-party vendors. Read more
Increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of AI by threat actors, heighten these risks. The Company has implemented a formal cybersecurity program; however, threat actors’ techniques continue to evolve and may not be identifiable until deployed, which could limit the Company’s ability to prevent unauthorized access, data compromise, service disruption, or fraudulent activity. The Company may be unable to anticipate and/or implement appropriate controls needed to protect against these evolving threats or be required to expend additional resources to prepare for and respond to any cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Evolving threats may outpace defenses, requiring…
No longer in the text (4)
Natural disasters, such as adverse weather, fires, earthquakes, power shortages and outages, geopolitical events, such as terrorism, war, political instability, or other conflict, public health crises and disease epidemics and pandemics, criminal activities, disruptions to supply chains, inaccessibility of natural resources, and other disruptions or events beyond the Company’s control could negatively affect the Company’s operations. Any of these events may result in a temporary decline of testing volumes and other work in both segments. In addition, such events may temporarily interrupt the Company’s ability to transport specimens, efficiently commence, continue, or complete its work on studies, utilize information technology systems, utilize certain laboratories, and/or to receive material from its suppliers. Such events can also affect customer operations and thereby impact testing…
Dx testing services are billed to MCOs, Medicare, Medicaid, physicians and physician groups, hospitals, patients, and employer groups. Read more
Most testing services are billed to a party other than the physician or other authorized person who ordered the test. Increases in the percentage of services billed to government and MCOs could have an adverse effect on the Company’s revenues.
The Company expects the efforts to impose reduced reimbursement, more stringent payment policies, and utilization and cost controls by government and other payers to continue. Read more
If Dx cannot offset additional reductions in the payments it receives for its services by reducing costs, increasing test volume, and/or introducing new services and procedures, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues, profitability, and cash flows. In 2014, Congress passed PAMA, requiring Medicare to change the way payment rates are calculated for tests paid under the CLFS, and to base the payment on the weighted median of rates paid by private payers. Pursuant to PAMA, reimbursement rates for many clinical laboratory tests provided under Medicare were reduced from 2018 through 2020. Enforcement of PAMA was suspended each year from 2021 through 2025, but a long-term resolution through…
The Company’s ability to attract and retain MCOs is critical given the impact of healthcare reform, changes in coverage and evolving value-based care and risk-based reimbursement delivery models (e.g., accountable care organizations (ACOs) and Independent Physician Associations (IPAs)).
65 more paragraphs differ; the filings below have the full text.
Matched automatically, quoted as filed, and may include rewording of an existing risk. Compares Item 1A of the 10-K filed Feb 24, 2026 ↗ with the 10-K filed Feb 25, 2025 ↗.
24
What to watch going forwardSite analysis
- Biopharma demand in BLS.
- Outreach acquisitions and integration.
- Medicare reimbursement changes.
- AMCA settlement approval.
25
Source documentsShow
This page's financial figures come from the Form 10-Ks listed below. Check the original filings for full detail.
Other sources referenced in the analysis
Last updated
Analysis last edited: October 31, 2026 · Financial data fetched: October 27, 2026 15:52 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: February 24, 2026
Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-02-24Proxy statement (2026)
Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.
This page is this site’s own analysis based on public information, and does not represent Labcorp’s views. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and this site does not guarantee the accuracy of any figure or statement here. Always verify against the original source documents before making an investment decision.