KabuDo

NYSE: LH · Health Care Services

Labcorp

Labcorp, based in Burlington, North Carolina, is a global leader in laboratory services: its nearly 71,000 employees performed more than 750 million tests in 2025 and served clients in about 100 countries. It reports two segments — Diagnostics Laboratories ($10,877 million of 2025 revenue), which runs testing labs, more than 2,200 patient service centers and over 7,000 in-office phlebotomists in the U.S. and Canada, and Biopharma Laboratory Services ($3,098 million), which supported about 85% of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2025. After spinning off its clinical development business as Fortrea in June 2023, revenue grew to $13,952 million in 2025 and net income to $876 million. It keeps buying hospital outreach lab businesses (e.g., BioReference and Community Health Systems assets in 2025) and returned $450 million through buybacks plus $241 million of dividends in 2025.

Last updated

Analysis last edited: October 31, 2026 · Financial data fetched: October 27, 2026 15:52 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: February 24, 2026

Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-02-2410-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) · filed 2026-10-30Proxy statement (2026)

Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.

01

At a glanceFrom SEC data

Eight headline measures, each placed among the companies covered on this site.

Revenue growth
1.5%

Higher than 8% of 372 non-financial companies

Average yearly growth over the years shown

Operating margin
9.9%

Higher than 25% of 311 non-financial companies

Latest fiscal year (FY2025)

ROIC minus WACC
+0.6 pts

Higher than 36% of 311 non-financial companies

Return on capital above (or below) its estimated cost

Net debt ÷ EBITDA
2.4x

Higher than 64% of 304 non-financial companies

Below 0 means more cash than debt

Cash conversion
1.87x

Higher than 67% of 349 non-financial companies

Operating cash flow ÷ net income

Dividend raises
0 of 5

Years the dividend per share rose, of the last 5

P/E today
29.3x

Latest close 2026-11-04; trailing 12 months to 2026-09-30

Beta
0.51

Above 1 = moves more than the market

Each marker shows where this company sits among the non-financial companies covered on this site, not all listed companies (left = lowest, right = highest). A high position is not automatically good — for net debt ÷ EBITDA, higher means more debt. Details and formulas are in the sections below and in How to read this.

02

Valuation todayFrom SEC data

Price-based measures at the latest close, next to the same measures at the last fiscal year-end.

Share price$358.30close on 2026-11-04

Market cap$29.45B

P/E today
29.3x

At FY2025 year-end: 24.0x

Earnings: trailing 12 months to 2026-09-30

P/B today
3.4x

At FY2025 year-end: 2.4x

Book value at FY2025 year-end

EV/EBITDA today
16.7x

At FY2025 year-end: 12.4x

EBITDA for FY2025

FCF yield today
4.1%

At FY2025 year-end: 5.8%

Free cash flow for FY2025

Dividend yield today
0.8%

Dividends per share for FY2025

“Today” uses the latest closing price (2026-11-04, Yahoo Finance daily closing prices) and shares outstanding at the last fiscal year-end. The rest of this page — including the financial table and ROIC vs. WACC — uses fiscal year-end prices. These are reference figures, not a judgment of whether the stock is cheap or expensive.

03

What changed since last earningsFrom SEC data

The latest reported quarter against the same quarter a year earlier, the balance sheet against the previous quarter-end, and what management said in its latest earnings release.

Quarter ended Sep 30, 2026.

  • Revenue↑ +6.9%$3.56B → $3.81B (vs. a year earlier)
  • Operating margin↓ −0.6 pts11.1% → 10.6% (vs. a year earlier)
  • Net income↑ +0.7%$261M → $263M (vs. a year earlier)
  • Diluted EPS↑ +3.2%$3.12 → $3.22 (vs. a year earlier)
  • Cash↑ +84.6%$142M → $262M (vs. previous quarter-end)
  • Long-term debt→ −0.1%$5.86B → $5.85B (vs. previous quarter-end)

Source: Form 10-Q ↗ (SEC XBRL). Long-term debt is the tagged long-term debt figure and leaves out short-term borrowings.

From the earnings release of Oct 28, 2026.

Management outlook • Issued

Updating 2026 full-year guidance. Source sentence
Labcorp is updating 2026 full year guidance to reflect its third quarter performance and full year outlook.

Key changes

  • Quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Source sentence
    On October 21, 2026, the company announced a quarterly cash dividend of $0.72 per share of common stock, payable on December 11, 2026, to stockholders of record at the close of business on November 24, 2026.
  • $1.4B left under its repurchase program. Source sentence
    The company has $1.4 billion remaining under its board-authorized share repurchase program, providing continued flexibility to return capital to shareholders.

Written by AI. A line appears only if its figures and direction match the quoted sentence, which an automatic check confirms. Companies' outlooks are their own and may not be met. Read the release ↗

04

Company profileFrom SEC dataShow

Legal name
LABCORP HOLDINGS INC.
Headquarters
BURLINGTON, NC
Fiscal year end
12/31
Exchange & ticker
NYSE: LH
Industry
Health Care Services
CIK
920148

Workforce (as of FY2025 year-end)

  • Employees

    71,000

Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) cover page and business description

05

Earnings calendarFrom SEC dataShow

When the company reports each quarter: the quarter-end date, the day results were released, and when the 10-Q or 10-K was filed.

Next report

Q4 FY2026

Quarter end: December 2026. In past years, Q4 results were released 37–48 days after quarter end (Feb 17, 2026; Feb 6, 2025; Feb 15, 2024). No date has been announced in the sources this site uses.

Reporting pattern

  • Fiscal year ends around December 31.
  • Reports four times a year: three quarterly reports (10-Q) and an annual report (10-K) for Q4.
  • Earnings releases came 24–48 days after quarter end over the last 12 quarters.
QuarterQuarter endedEarnings release (8-K)Report filed (10-Q / 10-K)
Q3 FY2026Sep 30, 2026Oct 28, 2026 (+28 days)Oct 30, 2026 10-Q (+30 days)
Q2 FY2026Jun 30, 2026Jul 30, 2026 (+30 days)Aug 5, 2026 10-Q (+36 days)
Q1 FY2026Mar 31, 2026Apr 30, 2026 (+30 days)May 4, 2026 10-Q (+34 days)
Q4 FY2025Dec 31, 2025Feb 17, 2026 (+48 days)Feb 24, 2026 10-K (+55 days)
Q3 FY2025Sep 30, 2025Oct 28, 2025 (+28 days)Oct 31, 2025 10-Q (+31 days)
Q2 FY2025Jun 30, 2025Jul 24, 2025 (+24 days)Aug 1, 2025 10-Q (+32 days)
Q1 FY2025Mar 31, 2025Apr 29, 2025 (+29 days)Apr 29, 2025 10-Q (+29 days)
Q4 FY2024Dec 31, 2024Feb 6, 2025 (+37 days)Feb 25, 2025 10-K (+56 days)
Q3 FY2024Sep 30, 2024Oct 24, 2024 (+24 days)Oct 29, 2024 10-Q (+29 days)
Q2 FY2024Jun 30, 2024Aug 1, 2024 (+32 days)Aug 2, 2024 10-Q (+33 days)
Q1 FY2024Mar 31, 2024Apr 25, 2024 (+25 days)Apr 30, 2024 10-Q (+30 days)
Q4 FY2023Dec 31, 2023Feb 15, 2024 (+46 days)Feb 26, 2024 10-K (+57 days)

Source: SEC EDGAR filing history. Release dates are the dates the earnings release was furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K (Item 2.02), which is normally the day results are announced. For a quarter whose 10-Q or 10-K isn’t filed yet, the date is the latest Item 2.02 8-K since the previous report, which may be a preliminary or other results-related update. Fiscal years are labeled by the calendar year in which they end.

06

Flagship products & servicesSite analysis

  • Dx

    Routine and specialty diagnostics

    Core and specialty tests incl. genetics (Invitae) and oncology.

  • Dx

    Hospital outreach lab acquisitions

    Acquisitions of hospital lab outreach businesses such as BioReference Health and Community Health Systems assets.

  • BLS

    Central laboratory and early development

    Lab testing for clinical trials and preclinical drug development.

From the Form 10-K, FY2025.

U.S., worldwide and country/regional share of flagship products/services

Only shares the company itself states (in its filings or press releases, sometimes citing a research firm) are shown. Scope and timing vary by figure — treat these as approximate.

  • Drug development lab support

    FDA new drug approvals

    U.S. share

    —

    Not disclosed

    Worldwide share

    ≈85% of 2025 approvals supported

    Company-disclosed

    BLS supported approximately 85% of new drugs and therapeutic products approved by the FDA in 2025.

Sources:

Company-stated figure from the 10-K.

07

Recent strategic focusSite analysis

Recent developments.

  1. Hospital outreach deals

    Acquired BioReference Health assets and Community Health Systems outreach assets in 2025; Parkview deal expected to close in 2026.

    Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  2. Post-Fortrea focus

    Spun off its clinical development business as Fortrea in June 2023 to focus on Dx and BLS.

    Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  3. Q3 2026

    Revenue $3.81B (+6.9%); diluted EPS $3.22 (+3.3%), adjusted $4.78 (+14.5%). Labcorp raised 2026 adjusted EPS guidance to $18.30–18.70, announced or closed four acquisitions, and won FDA approval of PGDx elio tissue complete as a melanoma companion diagnostic.

    Source: Q3 2026 earnings release

Capex ÷ D&A (FY2025)

0.64x

Below depreciation — investment is being pared back

formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization

e.g.$435M ÷ $681M = 0.64x

termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)

M&A spend (5-year total)

$3.75B

Latest year: $582M

Cash-flow-statement spending on acquisitions, net of cash acquired

Where the money goes, over time

Unit: $M. Capex went from $422M in FY2021 to $435M in FY2025

  • Capex
  • M&A spend

formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization

termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24

08

Key figures at a glanceFrom SEC data

FY2021–FY2025, 5 years.

Revenue (FY2025)

$13.95B

As reported in the 10-K

Revenue CAGR (4 years)

+1.5%

formula(last-period revenue ÷ first-period revenue) ^ (1 ÷ years) − 1

e.g.($13,952M ÷ $13,136M) ^ (1÷4) − 1 = 1.5%

termsCAGR · ^ (exponent) · Revenue (net sales)

Operating margin (FY2025)

9.9%▼caution

-13.3pt vs. 4 years ago

formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100

e.g.$1,385M ÷ $13,952M × 100 = 9.9%

termsOperating income · Revenue (net sales)

ROE (FY2025)

10.5%▲favorable

5-year average: 12.2%

As reported in the 10-K

P/B (FY2025 end)

2.39x

formulafiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share

e.g.$250.88 ÷ $104.86 = 2.39x

termsP/B · BVPS

Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's P/B

EV/EBITDA (FY2025 end)

12.4x

formula(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization)

e.g.($20,622M + $5,585M − $532M) ÷ ($1,385M + $681M) = 12.4x

termsEV/EBITDA · Market capitalization · Interest-bearing debt · EBITDA · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)

Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's multiple

  • ―

    Revenue grew +1.5% a year over 4 years (modest growth)

    From $13.14B in FY2021 to $13.95B in FY2025. The annualized rate (CAGR) makes it possible to compare growth pace across companies of different sizes.

  • ▼

    Operating margin declined: 23.2% → 9.9%

    How much operating profit is left per $100 of revenue. It moved -13.3 points over 4 years — pricing power, cost control, and product mix all show up here.

  • ―

    Equity ratio is 46.9% (a middling level)

    The share of total assets funded by equity rather than debt. 50%+ is often read as low bankruptcy risk, though the right level varies by industry (real estate and leasing run lower, for instance).

  • ▲

    Free cash flow was positive in 5 of 5 years

    Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures: the cash left over after funding the business’s own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. A negative year can mean heavy investment, or weak core earnings — worth distinguishing.

  • ▲

    ROE averaged 12.2% over 5 years (latest: 10.5%)

    How much profit was generated on shareholders’ equity. Roughly 10%+ is often cited as solid for a U.S. company, though this varies a lot by industry and capital intensity.

09

Business modelSite analysis

Performs diagnostic tests ordered by doctors and hospitals and paid by insurers, patients and government programs, and runs central lab and early development testing for pharmaceutical and biotech companies.

How money and goods flow at Labcorp
  1. 01 what it draws on

    Inputs & resources

    • Nearly 71,000 employees in 17 countries
    • Laboratory network, 2,200+ patient service centers, 7,000+ in-office phlebotomists
    • Scientific and test menu breadth
  2. 02 what it does

    Activities

    • Diagnostics Laboratories (Dx): routine and specialty testing
    • Biopharma Laboratory Services (BLS): central lab and early development
  3. 03 who it serves

    Customers

    • Physicians, hospitals, health systems, insurers, Medicare/Medicaid and patients
    • Pharmaceutical and biotech companies
  4. 04 how money comes in

    How it earns

    • Diagnostics Laboratories $10,877M (2025)
    • Biopharma Laboratory Services $3,098M

How the business makes money

  • About 87% of revenue from North America, 9% Europe, 4% other.
  • Dx payers 2025: clients 23%, patients 10% and others incl. managed care and Medicare/Medicaid.
  • Expects to buy select lab assets from Parkview in 2026.

Government & regulation around the business

Non-market factors from the company’s filings: what governments and regulators fund, buy, set, approve or restrict, and which part of the flow above each one touches.

Labcorp’s Medicare lab rates are cut under PAMA, with reductions frozen for now.

  • Regulated prices & reimbursement

    Government reimbursement

    PAMA has reduced Medicare rates for many tests, with further cuts expected though currently frozen.

    Constrains the businessTouches: How it earns

    Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  • Approvals & licenses

    FDA drug development support

    Supported more than 85% of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2025.

    Supports the businessTouches: Customers

    Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)

Revenue by segment (FY2025)

Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue

  • Diagnostics Laboratories

    10,876.5 (78%)
  • Biopharma Laboratory Services

    3,098.2 (22%)

Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) Segment revenues before intercompany eliminations; total revenues $13,952M.

10

Contract structureSite analysisShow

Short-term or spot sales carry different earnings quality than long-term or auto-renewing contracts — this shows how the company actually contracts with its customers.

11

Customers & suppliersSite analysis

Who the company sells to and buys from. Companies rarely name either, so named counterparties come only from the company's own filings and press releases; otherwise this lists the concentration figures the 10-K discloses.

Customers

Physicians, hospitals, payers, patients and biopharma companies.

Named by the company

No single customer is material.

Suppliers

Lab equipment and reagent suppliers.

Named by the company

No material supplier is named.

12

Competitors & peersSite analysis

Competitors the 10-K names, and the peer group the company itself chose in its proxy statement. Nothing here is this site's own pick.

The 10-K describes a fragmented market of hospital, physician-office and independent labs without naming competitors.

Competitors named in the 10-K

Peer group the company chose

Compensation peer group, from the proxy statement. Peers are companies the board considers comparable — for example when setting executive pay — not necessarily direct competitors.

2025 peer group from the 2026 proxy statement.

Source: Proxy statement (2026)

Company names link to this site’s analysis where one exists; “site ↗” opens the company’s own website.

13

Six years of financialsFrom SEC data

Each chart's axis holds a single unit (never mixing dollars, %, and $/share). The table's per-period header links to the filing the numbers came from.

Revenue over time

Unit: $M

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24

Profit over time (operating → net)

Unit: $M

  • Operating income
  • Pretax income
  • Net income

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24

Margins over time

Unit: %

  • Operating margin
  • Net margin

formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100

termsOperating income · Revenue (net sales)

formulanet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100

termsNet income (attributable to the company)

Cash flow over time

Unit: $M (below zero = cash went out)

  • Operating CF
  • Investing CF
  • Free CF

formulacash flow from operations − capital expenditures

termsFree cash flow (FCF) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Capital expenditures (capex)

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24

Financial stability & capital efficiency

Unit: %

  • Equity ratio
  • ROE

formulatotal equity ÷ total assets × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)

termsStockholders’ equity · Total assets

formulanet income ÷ average equity (beginning + ending, ÷2) × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)

termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Stockholders’ equity

Earnings per share (EPS) and dividend per share

Unit: $

  • EPS
  • Dividend per share

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24

Line itemFY202110-K on EDGAR ↗FY202210-K on EDGAR ↗FY202310-K on EDGAR ↗FY202410-K on EDGAR ↗FY202510-K on EDGAR ↗
Income statement ($M)
Revenue13,13611,86412,16213,00913,952
Operating income3,0491,4377261,0871,385
Pretax income2,8881,2375699601,108
Net income (attributable)2,3771,279418746877
Revenue growthcalc(this year’s revenue − last year’s revenue) ÷ last year’s revenue × 100—-9.7%2.5%7.0%7.2%
Operating margincalcoperating income ÷ revenue × 10023.2%12.1%6.0%8.4%9.9%
Net margincalcnet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 10018.1%10.8%3.4%5.7%6.3%
Balance sheet ($M)
Total assets20,38520,15516,72518,37918,393
Total equity10,27310,0977,8758,0528,620
Interest-bearing debtSum of short- and long-term borrowings, notes/bonds payable5,4175,0394,0556,3325,585
Equity ratio50.4%50.1%47.1%43.8%46.9%
ROE24.1%12.6%4.7%9.4%10.5%
Cash flow ($M)
Operating CF3,1101,9561,3281,5861,641
Investing CF-885-1,652-1,171-1,367-1,194
Financing CF-2,066-1,322-59780-1,457
Free cash flowcalccash flow from operations − capital expenditures2,6881,5278741,0961,206
Cash and equivalents1,4733215371,519532
Per share & other
EPS ($)24.3913.974.778.8410.46
BVPS ($)110.35114.4793.8696.55104.86
Dividend per share ($)—2.162.882.882.88
Payout ratiocalcdividend per share ÷ diluted EPS × 100—15.5%60.4%32.6%27.5%
P/E (x)11.114.547.725.924.0
EV/EBITDA (x)calc(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization)8.011.417.313.812.4
P/B (x)calcfiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share2.451.772.422.382.39

P/B and EV/EBITDA use each period’s period-end (fiscal year-end) figures, not the current share price. Figures without a "calc" tag are as reported in the Form 10-K (the consolidated financial statements and, for older years, earlier 10-Ks), pulled automatically from SEC EDGAR. Where a later filing restated a prior period, the restated figure is used.

Last 8 quarters

Three-month figures from 10-Q filings. Change is versus the same quarter a year earlier. Newest quarter on top.

Quarter endedRevenueOperating incomeNet incomeDiluted EPS
2026-09-30$3.81B+6.9%$402M+1.4%$263M+0.7%$3.22
2026-06-30$3.73B+5.8%$452M+14.5%$299M+25.6%$3.64
2026-03-31$3.54B+5.8%$381M+16.8%$278M+30.5%$3.35
2025-12-31 †$3.52B+5.6%$268M+23.6%$165M+14.9%—
2025-09-30$3.56B$397M$261M$3.12
2025-06-30$3.53B$395M$238M$2.84
2025-03-31$3.35B$326M$213M$2.52
2024-12-31 †$3.33B$217M$143M—

† Fourth quarter = the 10-K’s annual figure minus the first three quarters; quarterly EPS isn’t derived this way because share counts change during the year.

Data left out of this analysis

  • FY2020: FY2020 figures include the clinical development business spun off as Fortrea in June 2023 and were not restated, so they are not comparable.

14

Is ROIC above WACC?From SEC data

ROIC (the return on money invested in the business) above WACC (the cost of raising that money) means the company is creating value. WACC is an estimate, so its assumptions can be adjusted below.

ROIC (FY2025)

7.4%

formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)

e.g.$1,385M × (1 − 24%) ÷ $14,294M × 100 = 7.4%

termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity

WACC (this site’s estimate)

6.75%

formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight

e.g.Equity weight: $20.62B ÷ ($20.62B + $5.58B) = 78.7%

e.g.Debt weight: $5.58B ÷ ($20.62B + $5.58B) = 21.3%

e.g.WACC: 7.8% × 78.7% + 4.0% × (1 − 24%) × 21.3% = 6.75%

termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization

ROIC − WACC

+0.6pt▲favorable

Earning more than the cost of capital (ROIC > WACC in 3 of 5 years)

formulaROIC − WACC (positive means the business earns more than its cost of capital)

termsROIC · WACC

How firm is this? With the equity risk premium ±1 point and beta ±0.2, WACC runs 5.6%–8.2% and ROIC − WACC runs −0.8 to +1.7 points. The sign flips inside this range, so the result depends on the assumptions. This describes the latest year and does not predict future value creation.

WACC 6.75% is this site’s estimate under the assumptions below (not a figure the company has published)

Risk-free rate
4.95% (10-year Treasury, 2026-11-03)
β
0.51 (price-derived adjusted beta, but correlation with the market is low (R² 0.03), so reliability is limited)
Equity risk premium
5.5%
Cost of equity
7.76%
Cost of debt
4.01%
Tax rate
24% (effective rate, FY2023–FY2025)
Capital structure (equity : debt)
79% : 21%
→ Change assumptions and recalculate

ROIC over time, vs. WACC

Unit: % — bars = each period's ROIC, horizontal line = latest WACC. Bars above the line are green, below are red

  • ROIC (above WACC)
  • ROIC (below WACC)
  • WACC 6.75%

formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)

termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity

formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight

termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization

Try different WACC assumptions

β and the equity risk premium are estimates with a real range of plausible values — move the sliders to check whether ROIC > WACC still holds. The risk-free rate starts at the 10-year Treasury yield on 2026-11-03 (U.S. Treasury).

Initial β: 0.51 (price-derived adjusted beta. Raw β 0.27, R² 0.03, 130 weeks)

formula0.67 × β + 0.33 (β = the slope of weekly stock returns regressed on weekly market returns)

e.g.0.67 × 0.266 + 0.33 = 0.508

termsβ (beta)

Period 2024-05-10–2026-11-04, using S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy. Source: Yahoo Finance price history.

Cost of equity7.76%

formularisk-free rate + β × equity risk premium

e.g.5.0% + 0.51 × 5.5% = 7.8%

termsCAPM · Risk-free rate · β (beta) · Equity risk premium (market risk premium)

Market value of equity$20.62B

formulafiscal year-end closing price × shares outstanding (= market cap)

termsMarket capitalization · Market value of equity

Interest-bearing debt$5.58B
Cost of debt4.01%

formulainterest expense ÷ interest-bearing debt × 100 (clamped to 0–10%; falls back to the risk-free rate if there’s no debt)

termsInterest-bearing debt · Risk-free rate

Capital structure (equity weight : debt weight)79% : 21%

15

What the price implies (DCF)From SEC data

A company's value can be written as its free cash flow divided by (cost of capital − perpetual growth). Working that backwards from the market's valuation shows how much growth the share price assumed — compared here with the company's actual past growth.

Growth the price implies (price on 2026-11-04)

3.3%

Perpetual FCF growth: g = r − FCF ÷ EV = 6.8% − 3.5%

Past FCF growth (FY2021–FY2025)

-18.2%

Compound annual rate, 4 years

Past revenue growth (FY2021–FY2025)

+1.5%

Compound annual rate, 4 years

Inputs (FY2025): free cash flow $1.21B (operating CF − capex); enterprise value $34.5B = market cap $29.45B (latest close, 2026-11-04) + debt $5.58B − cash and short-term investments $532M; r = WACC of 6.8% using this page’s default assumptions (β 0.51, risk-free 5.0%, market premium 5.5%).

Three WACC scenarios

The same calculation under cautious, base and optimistic cost-of-capital assumptions (risk-free rate fixed at the 10-year Treasury yield). Pick one to load it into the sliders below.

Try your own assumptions

V = FCF ÷ (r − g). It starts at the implied growth rate, where the theoretical value equals today’s enterprise value.

Theoretical enterprise value

$34.46B

FCF $1.21B ÷ (6.8% − 3.3%)

Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value

1.00x

Below 1x: these assumptions value the business below the market did

How sensitive the answer is

Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value for each combination of r and g.

g \ r4.8%5.8%6.8%7.8%8.8%
0%0.73x0.60x0.51x0.45x0.40x
2%1.25x0.92x0.73x0.60x0.51x
4%4.37x1.94x1.25x0.92x0.73x
6%——4.37x1.94x1.25x
8%————4.37x

A simplified model for seeing what the market price assumes, not a forecast or a target price. It treats free cash flow as growing at one constant rate forever; the result swings widely with small changes in r and g, and is undefined when g reaches r. Free cash flow here is operating cash flow minus capex, which is after interest — a full DCF of enterprise value would use cash flow before interest. Market cap uses the latest close (2026-11-04) × shares at fiscal year-end; free cash flow and WACC inputs are from the latest fiscal year.

16

Earnings qualityFrom SEC dataShow

The same reported profit can mean different things depending on whether it's backed by cash, driven by the core business, or the result of a one-off item. Four checks below.

  • ✓

    Operating CF ÷ net income: averages 2.00x

    Profit is backed by cash coming in.

  • ✓

    Accrual ratio (latest): -4.2%

    A small share of profit rests on accounting estimates.

  • ✓

    Core-earnings share (operating income ÷ pretax income): 125%

    Most profit comes from core operations.

  • ✓

    Days sales outstanding: 63 → 53 days

    No major slowdown in collecting on sales.

Operating CF vs. net income

Unit: $M — operating CF above net income means profit is backed by cash

  • Operating CF
  • Net income

formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company

termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)

formula(net income − operating CF) ÷ average total assets × 100

termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Total assets

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24

Profit bridge (FY2025)

Unit: $M — what moved profit from operating income to net income

  • Profit (each stage)
  • Pushed profit up
  • Pushed profit down

formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100

termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)

Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-24

Receivables & inventory days

Unit: days — days grow when receivables or inventory build up faster than sales

  • Days sales outstanding
  • Days inventory outstanding

formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365

termsAccounts receivable · Revenue (net sales)

formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365

termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)

Worked examples (latest period)

formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company

e.g.$1,641M ÷ $877M = 1.87x

termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)

formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100

e.g.$1,385M ÷ $1,108M × 100 = 125%

termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)

formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365

e.g.($1,944M + $2,104M) ÷ 2 ÷ $13,952M × 365 = 53 days

termsAccounts receivable · Revenue (net sales)

formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365

e.g.($493M + $535M) ÷ 2 ÷ $9,939M × 365 = 19 days

termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)

17

Who holds the sharesFrom SEC dataShow

How much of the stock large institutional investors report owning on SEC Form 13F, how much the directors and executive officers hold (and how much of the vote they control), and roughly how much is left for individual investors. Shown next to beta so the holder mix can be read alongside how much the stock swings.

Institutions, insiders and everyone else, 13F holdings as of 2026-06-30

“Everyone else” is what remains after shares reported on Form 13F and shares held by directors and executive officers: mostly individual investors, plus non-insider families or foundations and smaller or foreign institutions. The figures have different dates and 13F reports count some shares twice — read it as an approximate split.

Held by 13F filers
98.0%
Directors & officers (shares)
<1%
Everyone else (est.)
2.0%

individuals and other non-13F holders

Directors & officers (voting power)
<1%

no separate voting figure; shown as shares

Institutional-ownership rank
88 of 416

1 = most institutional; 21% of covered companies have more

Beta (adjusted)
0.51

above 1 = swings more than the market

  • 79.5M shares reported by 1,045 13F filers ÷ 81.1M shares outstanding on 2026-08-04. Option positions are excluded.
  • Directors and executive officers as a group, from the proxy statement’s beneficial-ownership table; includes shares they can acquire within 60 days.
  • A large “everyone else” share can still reflect a family, trust or foundation stake held outside the board; check the proxy statement’s 5% holders.

Sources: SEC Form 13F data set (holdings as of 2026-06-30) · Form DEF 14A filed 2026-04-10 (beneficial ownership table) · Form 10-Q cover page (shares outstanding as of 2026-08-04)

18

Strengths & weaknessesSite analysis

Strengths

  1. 1. Scale and reach

    More than 750 million tests in 2025 and support for about 85% of FDA-approved new drugs.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  2. 2. Growing revenue and margins

    Revenue up from $12,162M (2023) to $13,952M (2025); SG&A fell to 15.9% of revenue.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  3. 3. Shareholder returns

    $450M of buybacks and $241M of dividends in 2025.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

Weaknesses

  1. 1. Reimbursement exposure

    Medicare, Medicaid and managed care pricing affect Dx revenue.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  2. 2. Lower profit than 2021

    Net income was $876M in 2025 versus $2,377M in 2021.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  3. 3. Litigation from the AMCA breach

    Class action over the 2019 AMCA data breach is being settled.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025) — Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

19

What draws investors to itSite analysis

Why the stock can look attractive to investors — each point paired with what has to hold for it to stay true, and the opposing view. This is this site's analysis, not a recommendation to buy or sell.

P/E (FY2025)

24.0x

Price at fiscal year-end ÷ diluted EPS

Dividend yield (FY2025)

1.15%

Dividends per share ÷ fiscal year-end price

Payout ratio (FY2025)

28%

Dividends per share ÷ diluted EPS

FCF yield (FY2025)

5.8%

(Operating CF − capex) ÷ market cap

  1. 1. Steady lab demand

    Dx performed more than 750 million tests in 2025 across a broad test menu.

    What has to hold
    Reimbursement stays stable.
    The other side
    Pricing pressure.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

  2. 2. Drug development exposure

    BLS benefits from biotech and oncology innovation.

    What has to hold
    Biopharma funding recovers.
    The other side
    Cyclical R&D budgets.

    Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)

FY2020 is left out because it was not restated for the 2023 Fortrea spin-off.

20

ResilienceSite analysisShow

How well the company could absorb a bad year: its financial buffer, how its revenue and profit held up in the worst year on record, and what the 10-K says about the business's exposure to shocks. Figures and filing statements only — no overall rating.

1. Financial buffer (FY2025)

Cash & short-term investments ÷ debt due within a year

1.1x

$532M vs. $500M

Interest coverage (operating income ÷ interest expense)

6.2x

$1.38B vs. $224M

Free cash flow ÷ dividends paid

5.0x

$1.21B vs. $241M (FCF = operating CF − capex)

2. Worst year in the record, and the recovery

FigureWorst year-over-year changeBack to the prior level?
Revenue-9.7% in FY2022 ($13.14B → $11.86B)Yes, by FY2025
Operating income-52.9% in FY2022 ($3.05B → $1.44B)Not yet, as of FY2025

Covers only the 5 fiscal years on record (FY2021–FY2025), which may not include a full recession — the worst year here isn’t necessarily how the company would fare in a severe downturn.

3. Business resilience (from the 10-K)

  • Profitable every year

    Net income stayed positive every year 2021–2025 (lowest $418M in 2023).

    Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)

22

Risks (including geopolitical)Site analysis

Starting from the 10-K's Risk Factors section, organized by category — geopolitical, currency, raw materials, regulatory, disaster, and more — with impact and likelihood assessed by this site.

Risk map

Vertical = impact on results, horizontal = likelihood. Upper right = most severe. Numbers match the list below (placement is this site’s own assessment).

Impact
High
1
Med
34
2
Low
5
LowMedHigh

Likelihood →

"Company disclosure" vs. "this site’s assessment"

The description and mitigation for each risk are this site’s summary of the 10-K’s "Risk Factors" section. Impact and likelihood are this site’s own assessment, not the company’s — where the company discloses its own likelihood assessment, that is noted in the summary.

Impact is judged from how large the affected business is relative to total revenue/profit, and from the risk’s track record of moving results in the past. Likelihood is judged from the filing’s wording and the current business environment (already occurring, or recurring). See the rating criteria.

  1. 1Law & regulation

    Reimbursement and healthcare regulation

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    Changes to Medicare fee schedules, Medicaid billing rules and fraud-and-abuse laws.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    Not stated in the filings.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact High / Likelihood Med
  2. 2Competition & technology shift

    Competition and consolidation

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    Competes with hospital, physician-office and independent labs; consolidation of customers and competitors could shift pricing.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    Not stated in the filings.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact Med / Likelihood High
  3. 3Information security

    Patient data security

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    A third-party collections vendor breach (AMCA) led to class actions.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    Not stated in the filings.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact Med / Likelihood Med
  4. 4Demand & macro

    Biopharma spending

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    BLS depends on pharma and biotech R&D and clinical trial activity.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    Not stated in the filings.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact Med / Likelihood Med
  5. 5M&A & integration

    Acquisitions

    Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
    Integration of outreach and specialty lab acquisitions.
    Company’s stated mitigation
    Not stated in the filings.
    This site’s assessment
    Impact Low / Likelihood Med

23

What changed in the risk factorsFrom SEC data

Paragraphs in the latest 10-K's Risk Factors that have little overlap with the year before, and paragraphs that were dropped.

New or substantially reworded (8)

  • Natural disasters (e.g., severe weather, fires, and earthquakes), geopolitical events (e.g., terrorism, war, and political instability), public health crises, criminal activity, supply chain disruptions, and other events beyond the Company’s control could negatively affect the Company’s operations. These disruptions may temporarily reduce testing volumes, delay study progress, hinder specimen transport, limit access to laboratories and IT systems, and interrupt supply deliveries. They may also affect customer operations, further decreasing demand. Prolonged disruptions caused by such events, especially in key operational locations, could harm the Company’s results of operations.

  • The Company’s diagnostic testing services are primarily billed to third parties, including MCOs, employer plans, and other health insurance providers. Read more

    A shift toward a higher mix of government and MCO payers may adversely effect revenues due to lower reimbursement rates. Ongoing efforts by payers to reduce reimbursement, tighten payment policies, and control utilization are expected to continue. If the Company cannot offset these reductions through cost efficiencies, increased volume or new services, its revenues, profitability, and cash flows may be materially impacted. PAMA has already reduced Medicare reimbursement rates for many tests, and further reductions are expected, although rate reductions are frozen for 2026 and capped at 15% per year for 2027-2029. Delays and changes in coding, billing, and payer policies have historically impacted

  • revenue and margins, and similar disruptions may continue. Increasing patient cost-sharing and evolving value-based care models also pose collection challenges and may affect the Company’s ability to attract and retain MCOs.

  • BLS supports pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device companies in navigating the regulatory approval and post-approval compliance requirements process. Read more

    Changes in government regulations, whether easing or tightening requirements and changes in government operations, including staff reductions and reorganization efforts, could reduce the demand for BLS’s services or make them less competitive. Additionally, efforts to control drug and device costs, or changes in insurer reimbursement practices, may lead customers to reduce R&D spending, which could adversely affect BLS’s business.

  • BLS’s revenues are closely tied to R&D spending by pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device companies, which may depend on access to capital and reimbursement from payers. Read more

    Economic conditions, industry trends, or funding constraints could lead to reduced or delayed R&D activity or outsourcing, materially impacting BLS’s business and financial performance.

  • The Company’s quarterly results of operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter making it harder to predict future results.

  • The Company’s operations rely on the continued performance and security of its information technology systems. Read more

    System failures, cybersecurity incidents, disruptions, or other issues affecting information technology systems could impair data processing, service delivery, billing, and customer communications. The Company also relies on third parties for critical services, including transportation, supplies, and data processing and expects them to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including environmental, health and safety, and privacy and data security laws. Failures by these providers, whether operational, legal, or cybersecurity-related, and issues affecting their information technology systems, could disrupt services, compromise personal or other confidential information, expose the Company to liability and could materially impact its business, even if the Company is not…

  • The Company continues to face cybersecurity threats, including ransomware attempts, data breaches, and phishing and social engineering attempts targeting its systems and its employees, and those of third-party vendors. Read more

    Increasingly sophisticated methods, including the use of AI by threat actors, heighten these risks. The Company has implemented a formal cybersecurity program; however, threat actors’ techniques continue to evolve and may not be identifiable until deployed, which could limit the Company’s ability to prevent unauthorized access, data compromise, service disruption, or fraudulent activity. The Company may be unable to anticipate and/or implement appropriate controls needed to protect against these evolving threats or be required to expend additional resources to prepare for and respond to any cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Evolving threats may outpace defenses, requiring…

No longer in the text (4)

  • Natural disasters, such as adverse weather, fires, earthquakes, power shortages and outages, geopolitical events, such as terrorism, war, political instability, or other conflict, public health crises and disease epidemics and pandemics, criminal activities, disruptions to supply chains, inaccessibility of natural resources, and other disruptions or events beyond the Company’s control could negatively affect the Company’s operations. Any of these events may result in a temporary decline of testing volumes and other work in both segments. In addition, such events may temporarily interrupt the Company’s ability to transport specimens, efficiently commence, continue, or complete its work on studies, utilize information technology systems, utilize certain laboratories, and/or to receive material from its suppliers. Such events can also affect customer operations and thereby impact testing…

  • Dx testing services are billed to MCOs, Medicare, Medicaid, physicians and physician groups, hospitals, patients, and employer groups. Read more

    Most testing services are billed to a party other than the physician or other authorized person who ordered the test. Increases in the percentage of services billed to government and MCOs could have an adverse effect on the Company’s revenues.

  • The Company expects the efforts to impose reduced reimbursement, more stringent payment policies, and utilization and cost controls by government and other payers to continue. Read more

    If Dx cannot offset additional reductions in the payments it receives for its services by reducing costs, increasing test volume, and/or introducing new services and procedures, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues, profitability, and cash flows. In 2014, Congress passed PAMA, requiring Medicare to change the way payment rates are calculated for tests paid under the CLFS, and to base the payment on the weighted median of rates paid by private payers. Pursuant to PAMA, reimbursement rates for many clinical laboratory tests provided under Medicare were reduced from 2018 through 2020. Enforcement of PAMA was suspended each year from 2021 through 2025, but a long-term resolution through…

  • The Company’s ability to attract and retain MCOs is critical given the impact of healthcare reform, changes in coverage and evolving value-based care and risk-based reimbursement delivery models (e.g., accountable care organizations (ACOs) and Independent Physician Associations (IPAs)).

65 more paragraphs differ; the filings below have the full text.

Matched automatically, quoted as filed, and may include rewording of an existing risk. Compares Item 1A of the 10-K filed Feb 24, 2026 ↗ with the 10-K filed Feb 25, 2025 ↗.

24

What to watch going forwardSite analysis

  • Biopharma demand in BLS.
  • Outreach acquisitions and integration.
  • Medicare reimbursement changes.
  • AMCA settlement approval.

25

Source documentsShow

This page's financial figures come from the Form 10-Ks listed below. Check the original filings for full detail.

Last updated

Analysis last edited: October 31, 2026 · Financial data fetched: October 27, 2026 15:52 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: February 24, 2026

Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-02-24Proxy statement (2026)

Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.

This page is this site’s own analysis based on public information, and does not represent Labcorp’s views. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and this site does not guarantee the accuracy of any figure or statement here. Always verify against the original source documents before making an investment decision.