Nasdaq: PTC · Application Software
PTC Inc.
PTC, based in Boston, sells product lifecycle software to manufacturers: Creo 3D CAD and Onshape, Windchill PLM, Codebeamer ALM and ServiceMax service lifecycle management, serving more than 30,000 customers. FY2025 (ended September 30, 2025) revenue rose 19% to $2,739 million (PLM $1,741 million, CAD $998 million) and operating income jumped 67% to $982 million; net income was $734 million. In March 2026 it sold its Kepware and ThingWorx IoT businesses to a TPG-controlled buyer for about $531 million. On October 4, 2026 PTC agreed to be acquired by Schneider Electric for $205 per share in cash, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals.
Last updated
Analysis last edited: November 1, 2026 · Financial data fetched: November 1, 2026 09:49 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: November 21, 2025
Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2025-11-2110-Q (quarter ended 2026-06-30) · filed 2026-07-31Proxy statement (2025)
Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.
01
At a glanceFrom SEC data
Eight headline measures, each placed among the companies covered on this site.
- Revenue growthCAGRSmooths out year-to-year swings into "grew X% a year on average." Makes growth pace comparable across companies of very different sizes.
- 13.4%
- Operating marginOperating marginHow many cents of operating profit are left per dollar of revenue. Reflects pricing power and cost structure.
- 35.9%
- ROIC minus WACCROIC − WACC spreadThe difference between ROIC and WACC. Consistently positive implies value creation; consistently negative implies value destruction.
- +6.2 pts
- Net debt ÷ EBITDAEBITDAOperating income with D&A added back. A rough proxy for cash-generating power that’s less distorted by capital intensity, depreciation method, or financing/tax differences than net income.
- 0.9x
- Cash conversionOperating CF ÷ net income (cash conversion)How much of reported profit shows up as actual cash. 1x or higher means profit is backed by cash.
- 1.18x
- Dividend raisesDividend per shareTotal annual dividend paid per share (sum of all declared payments for the year).
- —
- P/E todayP/EShare price ÷ EPS — how many years of current earnings the stock price represents. This site uses the period-end figure as reported in the filing.
- 19.1x
- Betaβ (beta)How much a stock moves, on average, for a 1% move in the overall market. Above 1 means more volatile than the market, which raises the return shareholders require. This site computes it from about 2.5 years (roughly 130 weeks) of weekly returns, built from Yahoo Finance daily prices, regressed against an S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy, then applies the well-known long-run mean-reversion adjustment (0.67 × β + 0.33) as the WACC default.
- 1.01
Higher than 74% of 372 non-financial companies
Average yearly growth over the years shown
Higher than 88% of 311 non-financial companies
Latest fiscal year (FY2025)
Higher than 60% of 311 non-financial companies
Return on capital above (or below) its estimated cost
Higher than 34% of 304 non-financial companies
Below 0 means more cash than debt
Higher than 21% of 349 non-financial companies
Operating cash flow ÷ net income
Years the dividend per share rose, of the last 5
Latest close 2026-11-04; trailing 12 months to 2026-06-30
Above 1 = moves more than the market
Each marker shows where this company sits among the non-financial companies covered on this site, not all listed companies (left = lowest, right = highest). A high position is not automatically good — for net debt ÷ EBITDA, higher means more debt. Details and formulas are in the sections below and in How to read this.
02
Valuation todayFrom SEC data
Price-based measures at the latest close, next to the same measures at the last fiscal year-end.
Share price$195.04close on 2026-11-04
Market cap$23.31B
- P/EP/EShare price ÷ EPS — how many years of current earnings the stock price represents. This site uses the period-end figure as reported in the filing. today
- 19.1x
- P/BP/BShare price ÷ book value per share. Below 1x means the market values the company below its accounting net worth. This site uses the closing price nearest the fiscal year-end and highlights sub-1x readings. today
- 6.1x
- EV/EBITDAEV/EBITDAEnterprise value (≈ market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash) as a multiple of EBITDA — roughly, "how many years of EBITDA to buy the whole company." Lower is generally viewed as cheaper, and it’s more comparable than P/E across companies with different debt loads or depreciation policies. This site excludes noncontrolling interests from the EV calculation. today
- 22.4x
- FCF yieldFree cash flow (FCF)Operating CF minus capital expenditures — cash generated by the business after funding its own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. Acquisitions and securities purchases (also in investing CF) are not subtracted, so FCF can be positive in a year when total investing CF exceeds operating CF. today
- 3.7%
- Dividend yieldDividend per shareTotal annual dividend paid per share (sum of all declared payments for the year). today
- —
At FY2025 year-end: 33.4x
Earnings: trailing 12 months to 2026-06-30
At FY2025 year-end: 6.3x
Book value at FY2025 year-end
At FY2025 year-end: 23.3x
EBITDA for FY2025
At FY2025 year-end: 3.5%
Free cash flow for FY2025
Dividends per share for FY2025
“Today” uses the latest closing price (2026-11-04, Yahoo Finance daily closing prices) and shares outstanding at the last fiscal year-end. The rest of this page — including the financial table and ROIC vs. WACC — uses fiscal year-end prices. These are reference figures, not a judgment of whether the stock is cheap or expensive.
03
What changed since last earningsFrom SEC data
The latest reported quarter against the same quarter a year earlier, the balance sheet against the previous quarter-end, and what management said in its latest earnings release.
Quarter ended Jun 30, 2026.
These figures are behind: a newer quarter was reported on Nov 4, 2026, but SEC's structured data doesn't include it yet. Read the release ↗
- Revenue$644M → $600M (vs. a year earlier)↓ −6.8%$644M → $600M (vs. a year earlier)
- Operating margin32.6% → 27.7% (vs. a year earlier)↓ −4.8 pts32.6% → 27.7% (vs. a year earlier)
- Net income$141M → $119M (vs. a year earlier)↓ −16.0%$141M → $119M (vs. a year earlier)
- Diluted EPS$1.17 → $1.03 (vs. a year earlier)↓ −12.0%$1.17 → $1.03 (vs. a year earlier)
- Cash$439M → $351M (vs. previous quarter-end)↓ −20.0%$439M → $351M (vs. previous quarter-end)
- Long-term debt$1.17B → $1.4B (vs. previous quarter-end)↑ +19.2%$1.17B → $1.4B (vs. previous quarter-end)
Source: Form 10-Q ↗ (SEC XBRL). Long-term debt is the tagged long-term debt figure and leaves out short-term borrowings.
From the earnings release of Nov 4, 2026.
Key changes
ARR up 1% as reported. Source sentence
ARR increased 1% year over year on an as reported basis in Q4’26.
Q4 revenue down 24% at constant currency. Source sentence
6 In Q4’26, revenue declined 24% year over year on a constant currency basis .
Written by AI. A line appears only if its figures and direction match the quoted sentence, which an automatic check confirms. Companies' outlooks are their own and may not be met. Read the release ↗
04
Company profileFrom SEC dataShow
- Legal name
- PTC INC.
- Headquarters
- BOSTON, MA
- Incorporated in
- Massachusetts
- Fiscal year end
- 09/30
- Exchange & ticker
- Nasdaq: PTC
- Industry
- Application Software
- CIK
- 857005
- Website
- https://www.ptc.com/ ↗
- IR page
- https://investor.ptc.com/ ↗
Workforce (as of FY2025 year-end)
Employees
7,642
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) cover page and business description
05
Earnings calendarFrom SEC dataShow
When the company reports each quarter: the quarter-end date, the day results were released, and when the 10-Q or 10-K was filed.
Next report
Q1 FY2027
Quarter end: December 2026. In past years, Q1 results were released 31–36 days after quarter end (Feb 4, 2026; Feb 5, 2025; Jan 31, 2024). No date has been announced in the sources this site uses.
Reporting pattern
- Fiscal year ends around September 30.
- Reports four times a year: three quarterly reports (10-Q) and an annual report (10-K) for Q4.
- Earnings releases came 29–37 days after quarter end over the last 13 quarters.
| Quarter | Quarter ended | Earnings release (8-K) | Report filed (10-Q / 10-K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 FY2026 | — | Nov 4, 2026 | Not yet filed |
| Q3 FY2026 | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 (+29 days) | Jul 31, 2026 10-Q (+31 days) |
| Q2 FY2026 | Mar 31, 2026 | May 6, 2026 (+36 days) | May 7, 2026 10-Q (+37 days) |
| Q1 FY2026 | Dec 31, 2025 | Feb 4, 2026 (+35 days) | Feb 5, 2026 10-Q (+36 days) |
| Q4 FY2025 | Sep 30, 2025 | Nov 5, 2025 (+36 days) | Nov 21, 2025 10-K (+52 days) |
| Q3 FY2025 | Jun 30, 2025 | Jul 30, 2025 (+30 days) | Jul 31, 2025 10-Q (+31 days) |
| Q2 FY2025 | Mar 31, 2025 | — | May 1, 2025 10-Q (+31 days) |
| Q1 FY2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Feb 5, 2025 (+36 days) | Feb 6, 2025 10-Q (+37 days) |
| Q4 FY2024 | Sep 30, 2024 | Nov 6, 2024 (+37 days) | Nov 14, 2024 10-K (+45 days) |
| Q3 FY2024 | Jun 30, 2024 | Jul 31, 2024 (+31 days) | Aug 2, 2024 10-Q (+33 days) |
| Q2 FY2024 | Mar 31, 2024 | May 1, 2024 (+31 days) | May 3, 2024 10-Q (+33 days) |
| Q1 FY2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Jan 31, 2024 (+31 days) | Feb 2, 2024 10-Q (+33 days) |
| Q4 FY2023 | Sep 30, 2023 | Nov 1, 2023 (+32 days) | Nov 20, 2023 10-K (+51 days) |
Source: SEC EDGAR filing history. Release dates are the dates the earnings release was furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K (Item 2.02), which is normally the day results are announced. For a quarter whose 10-Q or 10-K isn’t filed yet, the date is the latest Item 2.02 8-K since the previous report, which may be a preliminary or other results-related update. Fiscal years are labeled by the calendar year in which they end.
06
Flagship products & servicesSite analysis
CAD
Creo
3D CAD for digital design, testing and modification of product models.
CAD
Onshape
SaaS product development platform uniting CAD with data management, collaboration and analytics.
PLM
Windchill
PLM suite managing the product development lifecycle from concept to end-of-life.
PLM
Codebeamer
Application lifecycle management for complex products.
PLM
ServiceMax
Service lifecycle management to improve asset uptime.
From the Form 10-K, FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30.
U.S. and worldwide share of flagship products/services
PTC does not state a market share in its 10-K.
Reviewed: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30) · Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-06-30)
07
Recent strategic focusSite analysis
Recent developments.
Schneider Electric merger
Agreed on October 4, 2026 to be acquired for $205 per share in cash; shares would be delisted from Nasdaq on closing.
Source: Form 8-K (2026-10-05) — Item 1.01
Q3 FY2026 results
Quarter ended June 30, 2026: revenue $600.0M (vs $643.9M); net income $118.8M (vs $141.3M); diluted EPS $1.03 (vs $1.17).
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-06-30)
IoT divestiture
Kepware and ThingWorx sold for $530.8M; proceeds funded a $375M accelerated share repurchase.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-06-30) — Note on Kepware and ThingWorx Divestiture
Capex ÷ D&A (FY2025)
0.11x
Below depreciation — investment is being pared back
formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization
e.g.$11M ÷ $103M = 0.11x
termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
R&D-to-revenue ratio (FY2025)
16.7%
formularesearch & development expense ÷ revenue × 100
e.g.$458M ÷ $2,739M × 100 = 16.7%
M&A spend (6-year total)
$2.41B
Latest year: $7M
Cash-flow-statement spending on acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Where the money goes, over time
Unit: $M. Capex went from $20M in FY2020 to $11M in FY2025
- Capex
- R&D
- M&A spend
formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization
termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2025-11-21
08
Key figures at a glanceFrom SEC data
FY2020–FY2025, 6 years.
Revenue (FY2025)
$2.74B
As reported in the 10-K
Revenue CAGR (5 years)
+13.4%▲favorable
formula(last-period revenue ÷ first-period revenue) ^ (1 ÷ years) − 1
e.g.($2,739M ÷ $1,458M) ^ (1÷5) − 1 = 13.4%
termsCAGR · ^ (exponent) · Revenue (net sales)
Operating margin (FY2025)
35.9%▲favorable
+21.4pt vs. 5 years ago
formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100
e.g.$982M ÷ $2,739M × 100 = 35.9%
ROE (FY2025)
20.9%▲favorable
6-year average: 15.7%
As reported in the 10-K
P/B (FY2025 end)
6.34x
formulafiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share
e.g.$203.02 ÷ $32.01 = 6.34x
Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's P/B
EV/EBITDA (FY2025 end)
23.3x
formula(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization)
e.g.($24,268M + $1,172M − $184M) ÷ ($982M + $103M) = 23.3x
termsEV/EBITDA · Market capitalization · Interest-bearing debt · EBITDA · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's multiple
- ▲
Revenue grew +13.4% a year over 5 years (strong growth)
From $1.46B in FY2020 to $2.74B in FY2025. The annualized rate (CAGR) makes it possible to compare growth pace across companies of different sizes.
- ▲
Operating margin improved: 14.5% → 35.9%
How much operating profit is left per $100 of revenue. It moved +21.4 points over 5 years — pricing power, cost control, and product mix all show up here.
- ▲
Equity ratio is 57.8% (a high level of financial stability)
The share of total assets funded by equity rather than debt. 50%+ is often read as low bankruptcy risk, though the right level varies by industry (real estate and leasing run lower, for instance).
- ▲
Free cash flow was positive in 6 of 6 years
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures: the cash left over after funding the business’s own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. A negative year can mean heavy investment, or weak core earnings — worth distinguishing.
- ▲
ROE averaged 15.7% over 6 years (latest: 20.9%)
How much profit was generated on shareholders’ equity. Roughly 10%+ is often cited as solid for a U.S. company, though this varies a lot by industry and capital intensity.
09
Business modelSite analysis
Business Model Canvas
The whole company in nine blocks. Left side: how it delivers (partners, activities, resources, costs). Right side: who it serves and how it earns. Every entry comes from the company’s filings shown on this page.
08 · who helps
Key partners
- Schneider Electric
- TPG (Parrot US Buyer)
07 · what it does
Key activities
- CAD: Creo and Onshape
- PLM: Windchill, Codebeamer, ServiceMax and related
- Support, cloud services and professional services
06 · what it draws on
Key resources
- 7,642 full-time employees (September 30, 2025)
- Software R&D
- Direct sales and partners
02 · why customers buy
Value propositions
- CAD, PLM and service software that help manufacturers design, build and service products.
04 · how it keeps them
Customer relationships
- Subscriptions with support.
03 · how it reaches them
Channels
- Direct sales force for large accounts and resellers for smaller ones.
01 · who it serves
Customer segments
- More than 30,000 manufacturing customers globally
- No customer above 10% of revenue
09 · where money goes
Cost structure
FY2025, share of revenue ($2.74B)
- Cost of revenue16.2%
- Research & development16.7%
- Selling, general & administrative8.3%
- Other operating costs22.9%
Operating profit left: 35.9% of revenue. Depreciation & amortization (inside the costs above): $103M. Capital spending: $11M.
Source: Form 10-K income statement and cash-flow statement (SEC XBRL).
05 · how money comes in
Revenue streams
- Revenue $2,739M (FY2025)
- PLM $1,741M; CAD $998M
- Americas $1,327M; Europe $995M; Asia Pacific $417M
Value propositions, channels and customer relationships: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Licenses CAD, PLM, ALM and SLM software, mostly on subscription, to manufacturers who design, build and service products.
01 what it draws on
Inputs & resources
- 7,642 full-time employees (September 30, 2025)
- Software R&D
- Direct sales and partners
02 what it does
Activities
- CAD: Creo and Onshape
- PLM: Windchill, Codebeamer, ServiceMax and related
- Support, cloud services and professional services
03 who it serves
Customers
- More than 30,000 manufacturing customers globally
- No customer above 10% of revenue
04 how money comes in
How it earns
- Revenue $2,739M (FY2025)
- PLM $1,741M; CAD $998M
- Americas $1,327M; Europe $995M; Asia Pacific $417M
How the business makes money
- ARR grew 10% in FY2025.
- Kepware and ThingWorx sold March 13, 2026.
- Agreed merger with Schneider Electric at $205 per share.
Government & regulation around the business
Non-market factors from the company’s filings: what governments and regulators fund, buy, set, approve or restrict, and which part of the flow above each one touches.
PTC follows anti-bribery, privacy and sanctions laws worldwide.
Approvals & licenses
Privacy and data rules
Subject to data privacy laws such as the EU GDPR, which add compliance costs.
Constrains the businessTouches: ActivitiesSource: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Trade & export rules
Export controls and sanctions
Subject to trade and economic sanctions laws.
Constrains the businessTouches: CustomersSource: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Revenue by segment (FY2025)
Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue
PLM
1,741.3 (64%)CAD
997.9 (36%)
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30) Revenue by product group; total $2,739.2M.
10
Where it earnsSite analysis
Many U.S.-listed companies earn most of their revenue outside the U.S. — this breaks down revenue by country/region so it's clear where the business actually makes its money.
Largest market (FY2025)
Americas — 48% of revenue
Revenue by country / region (FY2025)
Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue
Americas
1,327.2 (48%)Europe
995.1 (36%)Asia Pacific
416.9 (15%)
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30) By customer location; Asia Pacific derived as total less Americas and Europe.
11
Contract structureSite analysisShow
Short-term or spot sales carry different earnings quality than long-term or auto-renewing contracts — this shows how the company actually contracts with its customers.
12
Alliances & capital tiesSite analysisShow
Equity stakes, joint ventures, and strategic partnerships disclosed across the 10-K, 8-Ks, and proxy statement.
Pending or recent acquisition
Schneider Electric
Merger agreement of October 4, 2026: $205 per share in cash; $700M termination fee payable by PTC in certain cases.
Pending or recent acquisition
TPG (Parrot US Buyer)
Sold Kepware and ThingWorx on March 13, 2026 for $530.8M plus up to $125M contingent consideration.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-06-30) — Note on Kepware and ThingWorx Divestiture
13
Customers & suppliersSite analysis
Who the company sells to and buys from. Companies rarely name either, so named counterparties come only from the company's own filings and press releases; otherwise this lists the concentration figures the 10-K discloses.
Customers
More than 30,000 manufacturers globally.
Named by the company
No individual customer exceeded 10% of revenue in FY2023–FY2025.
Suppliers
Third-party technology and service providers.
Named by the company
No single supplier is named as material.
14
Competitors & peersSite analysis
Competitors the 10-K names, and the peer group the company itself chose in its proxy statement. Nothing here is this site's own pick.
PTC names competitors by product area in its 10-K.
Competitors named in the 10-K
Peer group the company chose
Peer group, from the proxy statement. Peers are companies the board considers comparable — for example when setting executive pay — not necessarily direct competitors.
17 U.S. software companies from the 2025 proxy statement.
- Akamai Technologiessite ↗
- ANSYSsite ↗
- Autodesksite ↗
- Bentley Systemssite ↗
- Cadence Design Systemssite ↗
- CrowdStrikesite ↗
- Dayforcesite ↗
- Dynatracesite ↗
- Fair Isaac (FICO)site ↗
- Guidewire Softwaresite ↗
- Nutanixsite ↗
- Paycomsite ↗
- Trimblesite ↗
- Tyler Technologiessite ↗
Company names link to this site’s analysis where one exists; “site ↗” opens the company’s own website.
15
Six years of financialsFrom SEC data
Each chart's axis holds a single unit (never mixing dollars, %, and $/share). The table's per-period header links to the filing the numbers came from.
Revenue over time
Unit: $M
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2025-11-21
Profit over time (operating → net)
Unit: $M
- Operating income
- Pretax income
- Net income
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2025-11-21
Margins over time
Unit: %
- Operating margin
- Net margin
formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100
formulanet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100
Cash flow over time
Unit: $M (below zero = cash went out)
- Operating CF
- Investing CF
- Free CF
formulacash flow from operations − capital expenditures
termsFree cash flow (FCF) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Capital expenditures (capex)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2025-11-21
Financial stability & capital efficiency
Unit: %
- Equity ratio
- ROE
formulatotal equity ÷ total assets × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)
termsStockholders’ equity · Total assets
formulanet income ÷ average equity (beginning + ending, ÷2) × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)
termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Stockholders’ equity
Earnings per share (EPS) and dividend per share
Unit: $
- EPS
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2025-11-21
| Line item | FY202010-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202110-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202210-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202310-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202410-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202510-K on EDGAR ↗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement ($M) | ||||||
| Revenue | 1,458 | 1,807 | 1,933 | 2,097 | 2,298 | 2,739 |
| Operating income | 211 | 381 | 447 | 458 | 588 | 982 |
| Pretax income | 135 | 392 | 397 | 333 | 469 | 920 |
| Net income (attributable) | 131 | 477 | 313 | 246 | 376 | 734 |
| Revenue growthcalc(this year’s revenue − last year’s revenue) ÷ last year’s revenue × 100 | — | 23.9% | 7.0% | 8.5% | 9.6% | 19.2% |
| Operating margincalcoperating income ÷ revenue × 100 | 14.5% | 21.1% | 23.1% | 21.9% | 25.6% | 35.9% |
| Net margincalcnet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100 | 9.0% | 26.4% | 16.2% | 11.7% | 16.4% | 26.8% |
| Balance sheet ($M) | ||||||
| Total assets | 3,383 | 4,508 | 4,687 | 6,289 | 6,384 | 6,617 |
| Total equity | 1,438 | 2,038 | 2,296 | 2,677 | 3,214 | 3,826 |
| Interest-bearing debtSum of short- and long-term borrowings, notes/bonds payable | 1,005 | 1,439 | 1,351 | 1,686 | 1,227 | 1,172 |
| Equity ratio | 42.5% | 45.2% | 49.0% | 42.6% | 50.4% | 57.8% |
| ROE | 9.1% | 27.4% | 14.4% | 9.9% | 12.8% | 20.9% |
| Cash flow ($M) | ||||||
| Operating CF | 234 | 369 | 435 | 611 | 750 | 868 |
| Investing CF | -526 | -688 | -201 | -866 | -125 | -38 |
| Financing CF | 297 | 370 | -264 | 268 | -651 | -909 |
| Free cash flowcalccash flow from operations − capital expenditures | 214 | 344 | 416 | 587 | 736 | 857 |
| Cash and equivalents | 275 | 327 | 272 | 288 | 266 | 184 |
| Per share & other | ||||||
| EPS ($) | 1.12 | 4.03 | 2.65 | 2.06 | 3.12 | 6.08 |
| BVPS ($) | 12.39 | 17.40 | 19.55 | 22.53 | 26.75 | 32.01 |
| P/E (x) | 73.9 | 29.7 | 39.5 | 68.8 | 57.9 | 33.4 |
| EV/EBITDA (x)calc(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization) | 35.4 | 32.5 | 25.0 | 32.4 | 32.6 | 23.3 |
| P/B (x)calcfiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share | 6.68 | 6.89 | 5.35 | 6.29 | 6.75 | 6.34 |
P/B and EV/EBITDA use each period’s period-end (fiscal year-end) figures, not the current share price. Figures without a "calc" tag are as reported in the Form 10-K (the consolidated financial statements and, for older years, earlier 10-Ks), pulled automatically from SEC EDGAR. Where a later filing restated a prior period, the restated figure is used.
Last 8 quarters
Three-month figures from 10-Q filings. Change is versus the same quarter a year earlier. Newest quarter on top.
| Quarter ended | Revenue | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | $600M-6.8% | $167M-20.6% | $119M-16.0% | $1.03 |
| 2026-03-31 | $774M+21.7% | $296M+32.4% | $591M+263.2% | $4.98 |
| 2025-12-31 | $686M+21.4% | $221M+91.4% | $167M+102.5% | $1.39 |
| 2025-09-30 † | $894M+42.7% | $434M+123.5% | $348M+174.9% | — |
| 2025-06-30 | $644M | $210M | $141M | $1.17 |
| 2025-03-31 | $636M | $223M | $163M | $1.35 |
| 2024-12-31 | $565M | $116M | $82M | $0.68 |
| 2024-09-30 † | $627M | $194M | $127M | — |
† Fourth quarter = the 10-K’s annual figure minus the first three quarters; quarterly EPS isn’t derived this way because share counts change during the year.
16
Is ROIC above WACC?From SEC data
ROIC (the return on money invested in the business) above WACC (the cost of raising that money) means the company is creating value. WACC is an estimate, so its assumptions can be adjusted below.
ROIC (FY2025)
16.4%
formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)
e.g.$982M × (1 − 21%) ÷ $4,720M × 100 = 16.4%
termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity
WACC (this site’s estimate)
10.26%
formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight
e.g.Equity weight: $24.27B ÷ ($24.27B + $1.17B) = 95.4%
e.g.Debt weight: $1.17B ÷ ($24.27B + $1.17B) = 4.6%
e.g.WACC: 10.5% × 95.4% + 6.6% × (1 − 21%) × 4.6% = 10.26%
termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization
How firm is this? With the equity risk premium ±1 point and beta ±0.2, WACC runs 8.4%–12.5% and ROIC − WACC runs +4.0 to +8.0 points. The sign holds across this range. This describes the latest year and does not predict future value creation.
WACC 10.26% is this site’s estimate under the assumptions below (not a figure the company has published)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.95% (10-year Treasury, 2026-11-03)
- β
- 1.01 (price-derived adjusted beta)
- Equity risk premium
- 5.5%
- Cost of equity
- 10.50%
- Cost of debt
- 6.57%
- Tax rate
- 21% (effective rate, FY2023–FY2025)
- Capital structure (equity : debt)
- 95% : 5%
ROIC over time, vs. WACC
Unit: % — bars = each period's ROIC, horizontal line = latest WACC. Bars above the line are green, below are red
- ROIC (above WACC)
- ROIC (below WACC)
- WACC 10.26%
formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)
termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity
formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight
termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization
Try different WACC assumptions
β and the equity risk premium are estimates with a real range of plausible values — move the sliders to check whether ROIC > WACC still holds. The risk-free rate starts at the 10-year Treasury yield on 2026-11-03 (U.S. Treasury).
Initial β: 1.01 (price-derived adjusted beta. Raw β 1.02, R² 0.15, 130 weeks)
formula0.67 × β + 0.33 (β = the slope of weekly stock returns regressed on weekly market returns)
e.g.0.67 × 1.020 + 0.33 = 1.014
termsβ (beta)
Period 2024-05-10–2026-11-04, using S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy. Source: Yahoo Finance price history.
formularisk-free rate + β × equity risk premium
e.g.5.0% + 1.01 × 5.5% = 10.5%
termsCAPM · Risk-free rate · β (beta) · Equity risk premium (market risk premium)
formulafiscal year-end closing price × shares outstanding (= market cap)
formulainterest expense ÷ interest-bearing debt × 100 (clamped to 0–10%; falls back to the risk-free rate if there’s no debt)
17
What the price implies (DCF)From SEC data
A company's value can be written as its free cash flow divided by (cost of capital − perpetual growth). Working that backwards from the market's valuation shows how much growth the share price assumed — compared here with the company's actual past growth.
Growth the price implies (price on 2026-11-04)
6.7%
Perpetual FCF growth: g = r − FCF ÷ EV = 10.3% − 3.5%
Past FCF growth (FY2020–FY2025)
+32.0%
Compound annual rate, 5 years
Past revenue growth (FY2020–FY2025)
+13.4%
Compound annual rate, 5 years
Inputs (FY2025): free cash flow $857M (operating CF − capex); enterprise value $24.3B = market cap $23.31B (latest close, 2026-11-04) + debt $1.17B − cash and short-term investments $184M; r = WACC of 10.3% using this page’s default assumptions (β 1.01, risk-free 5.0%, market premium 5.5%).
Three WACC scenarios
The same calculation under cautious, base and optimistic cost-of-capital assumptions (risk-free rate fixed at the 10-year Treasury yield). Pick one to load it into the sliders below.
Try your own assumptions
V = FCF ÷ (r − g). It starts at the implied growth rate, where the theoretical value equals today’s enterprise value.
Theoretical enterprise value
$23.8B
FCF $857M ÷ (10.3% − 6.7%)
Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value
0.98x
Below 1x: these assumptions value the business below the market did
How sensitive the answer is
Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value for each combination of r and g.
| g \ r | 8.3% | 9.3% | 10.3% | 11.3% | 12.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0.42x | 0.38x | 0.34x | 0.31x | 0.29x |
| 2% | 0.56x | 0.48x | 0.42x | 0.38x | 0.34x |
| 4% | 0.82x | 0.67x | 0.56x | 0.48x | 0.42x |
| 6% | 1.53x | 1.07x | 0.82x | 0.67x | 0.56x |
| 8% | 11.75x | 2.71x | 1.53x | 1.07x | 0.82x |
A simplified model for seeing what the market price assumes, not a forecast or a target price. It treats free cash flow as growing at one constant rate forever; the result swings widely with small changes in r and g, and is undefined when g reaches r. Free cash flow here is operating cash flow minus capex, which is after interest — a full DCF of enterprise value would use cash flow before interest. Market cap uses the latest close (2026-11-04) × shares at fiscal year-end; free cash flow and WACC inputs are from the latest fiscal year.
18
Earnings qualityFrom SEC dataShow
The same reported profit can mean different things depending on whether it's backed by cash, driven by the core business, or the result of a one-off item. Four checks below.
- ✓
Operating CF ÷ net income: averages 1.60x
Profit is backed by cash coming in.
- ✓
Accrual ratio (latest): -2.1%
A small share of profit rests on accounting estimates.
- ✓
Core-earnings share (operating income ÷ pretax income): 107%
Most profit comes from core operations.
- !
Days sales outstanding: 104 → 124 days
Receivables are growing faster than revenue — worth checking for looser collection terms or channel stuffing.
Operating CF vs. net income
Unit: $M — operating CF above net income means profit is backed by cash
- Operating CF
- Net income
formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company
termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)
formula(net income − operating CF) ÷ average total assets × 100
termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Total assets
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2025-11-21
Profit bridge (FY2025)
Unit: $M — what moved profit from operating income to net income
- Profit (each stage)
- Pushed profit up
- Pushed profit down
formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100
termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2025-11-21
Receivables & inventory days
Unit: days — days grow when receivables or inventory build up faster than sales
- Days sales outstanding
formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365
formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365
termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)
Worked examples (latest period)
formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company
e.g.$868M ÷ $734M = 1.18x
termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)
formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100
e.g.$982M ÷ $920M × 100 = 107%
termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)
formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365
e.g.($862M + $1,001M) ÷ 2 ÷ $2,739M × 365 = 124 days
formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365
termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)
19
Who holds the sharesFrom SEC dataShow
How much of the stock large institutional investors report owning on SEC Form 13F, how much the directors and executive officers hold (and how much of the vote they control), and roughly how much is left for individual investors. Shown next to beta so the holder mix can be read alongside how much the stock swings.
Institutions, insiders and everyone else, 13F holdings as of 2026-06-30
“Everyone else” is what remains after shares reported on Form 13F and shares held by directors and executive officers: mostly individual investors, plus non-insider families or foundations and smaller or foreign institutions. The figures have different dates and 13F reports count some shares twice — read it as an approximate split.
- Held by 13F filers
- 100%+
- Directors & officers (shares)
- <1%
- Everyone else (est.)
- ≈0%
- Directors & officers (voting power)
- <1%
- Institutional-ownership rank
- 34 of 416
- Beta (adjusted)
- 1.01
Reported total 103.3%
individuals and other non-13F holders
no separate voting figure; shown as shares
1 = most institutional; 8% of covered companies have more
above 1 = swings more than the market
- 112.1M shares reported by 684 13F filers ÷ 108.5M shares outstanding on 2026-07-29. Option positions are excluded.
- The 13F total exceeds shares outstanding because some shares are reported twice — for example shares lent to short sellers and then bought by another manager, or holdings that overlapping managers both report.
- Directors and executive officers as a group, from the proxy statement’s beneficial-ownership table; includes shares they can acquire within 60 days.
- A large “everyone else” share can still reflect a family, trust or foundation stake held outside the board; check the proxy statement’s 5% holders.
Sources: SEC Form 13F data set (holdings as of 2026-06-30) · Form DEF 14A filed 2025-12-23 (beneficial ownership table) · Form 10-Q cover page (shares outstanding as of 2026-07-29)
20
Strengths & weaknessesSite analysis
Strengths
1. Margin expansion
Operating income rose from $211M (FY2020) to $982M (FY2025).
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30)
2. Recurring revenue
ARR grew 10% in FY2025.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30)
3. Diversified customer base
Over 30,000 customers; none above 10% of revenue.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30)
Weaknesses
1. Strong incumbents
Competes with Autodesk, Dassault Systèmes and Siemens in CAD/PLM.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30)
2. Quarterly revenue dip
Q3 FY2026 revenue fell to $600M from $644M.
Evidence: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-06-30)
3. Debt from acquisitions
Long-term debt of $1,172M at September 30, 2025.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30)
21
What draws investors to itSite analysis
Why the stock can look attractive to investors — each point paired with what has to hold for it to stay true, and the opposing view. This is this site's analysis, not a recommendation to buy or sell.
P/E (FY2025)
33.4x
Price at fiscal year-end ÷ diluted EPS
Dividend yield (FY2025)
—
Dividends per share ÷ fiscal year-end price
Payout ratio (FY2025)
—
Dividends per share ÷ diluted EPS
FCF yield (FY2025)
3.5%
(Operating CF − capex) ÷ market cap
1. Takeover price
Schneider Electric offers $205 per share in cash.
- What has to hold
- Deal closes.
- The other side
- Regulatory or vote risk.
Evidence: Form 8-K (2026-10-05) — Item 1.01
2. High-margin software
FY2025 operating margin about 36%.
- What has to hold
- ARR keeps growing.
- The other side
- Competition.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30)
22
ResilienceSite analysisShow
How well the company could absorb a bad year: its financial buffer, how its revenue and profit held up in the worst year on record, and what the 10-K says about the business's exposure to shocks. Figures and filing statements only — no overall rating.
1. Financial buffer (FY2025)
Cash & short-term investments ÷ debt due within a year
7.4x
$184M vs. $25M
Interest coverage (operating income ÷ interest expense)
12.8x
$982M vs. $77M
Free cash flow ÷ dividends paid
—
2. Worst year in the record, and the recovery
| Figure | Worst year-over-year change | Back to the prior level? |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | No decline in the record | — |
| Operating income | No decline in the record | — |
Covers only the 6 fiscal years on record (FY2020–FY2025), which may not include a full recession — the worst year here isn’t necessarily how the company would fare in a severe downturn.
3. Business resilience (from the 10-K)
Recurring revenue through cycles
Revenue grew every year from FY2020 to FY2025.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025, year ended 2025-09-30)
23
Legal & regulatory mattersSite analysisShow
Lawsuits, government investigations, enforcement actions and settlements the company discloses — where each stands, what is at stake, and what comes next. From the 10-K's Legal Proceedings and contingencies note, the latest 10-Q, and 8-Ks.
PTC discloses no material pending legal proceedings; indemnification costs have historically been minimal.
Company statement:
Based on Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-06-30) — Note on Commitments and Contingencies, reviewed 2026-11-01. Routine ordinary-course claims are not listed. “Major” is this site’s judgment of which matters could materially affect results.
24
Risks (including geopolitical)Site analysis
Starting from the 10-K's Risk Factors section, organized by category — geopolitical, currency, raw materials, regulatory, disaster, and more — with impact and likelihood assessed by this site.
Risk map
Vertical = impact on results, horizontal = likelihood. Upper right = most severe. Numbers match the list below (placement is this site’s own assessment).
Likelihood →
"Company disclosure" vs. "this site’s assessment"
The description and mitigation for each risk are this site’s summary of the 10-K’s "Risk Factors" section. Impact and likelihood are this site’s own assessment, not the company’s — where the company discloses its own likelihood assessment, that is noted in the summary.
Impact is judged from how large the affected business is relative to total revenue/profit, and from the risk’s track record of moving results in the past. Likelihood is judged from the filing’s wording and the current business environment (already occurring, or recurring). See the rating criteria.
- 1M&A & integration
Merger completion
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- The Schneider Electric deal needs shareholder approval and antitrust and foreign investment clearances.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood Med
- 2Competition & technology shift
CAD/PLM competition
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Large established rivals and point-solution vendors.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood High
- 3Demand & macro
Manufacturing spending
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Results could suffer if manufacturing activity contracts or manufacturers face tariffs and other macroeconomic factors.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood Med
- 4FX & interest rates
Currency
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Large Europe and Asia Pacific revenue; currency moved ARR and revenue in FY2025.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Our foreign currency hedging program uses forward contracts to manage the foreign currency exposures that exist as part of our ongoing business operations.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood High
- 5Information security
Cyber risk
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Cloud and on-premise software face security threats.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Our corporate cybersecurity awareness activities are combined with enterprise-wide and department-specific tools and mandatory employee training, providing our employees with knowledge and resources to support our efforts to mitigate security threats. 17 Table of Contents Process .
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood Med
25
What changed in the risk factorsFrom SEC data
Paragraphs in the latest 10-K's Risk Factors that have little overlap with the year before, and paragraphs that were dropped.
New or substantially reworded (7)
We are subject to increasing, evolving, and conflicting expectations and scrutiny with respect to our sustainability disclosures and initiatives. Read more
Failure to meet stakeholder expectations or actual or perceived inconsistencies or inaccuracies in our sustainability disclosures could result in reputational harm, regulatory investigations, or litigation.
Expectations around environmental, social, governance and other sustainability matters continue to evolve rapidly, and stakeholders – including investors, customers, employees, and regulators – are increasingly focused on our sustainability disclosures and performance against targets. If we fail, or are perceived to have failed, to make progress on our stated sustainability targets or initiatives, or if our sustainability initiatives or disclosures are or are perceived to be inadequate, inaccurate, misleading, or unlawful, our reputation could be harmed, and we could face regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, fines, penalties, and litigation, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. Additionally, differing stakeholder views on sustainability priorities may create tension or conflict, which could adversely…
We are increasingly incorporating AI capabilities into many of our products to enable our customers to become more agile and productive. Read more
The integration of AI into our products presents risks and challenges, including that we may be unable to integrate AI technologies into our products when or as we expect, that our customers do not appreciate or realize the anticipated benefits of such technologies, that competitors may incorporate AI into their products more quickly or effectively, that our AI-based solutions could produce inaccurate results or have other unintended consequences, or that our AI-based solutions may expose us to lawsuits, regulatory investigations, or other proceedings, and subject us to legal liability as well as brand and reputational harm, all of which could negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
We also use AI tools internally to make certain business processes more efficient. Read more
While these technologies offer significant benefits, they also create risks and challenges. Although we implement measures to address the accuracy and appropriate use of AI tools, including internal AI policies and training, these efforts may not always be successful. Inadvertent selection of AI tools that introduce bias, errors, or hallucinations, as well as any failure by our employees, contractors, or partners to adhere to our AI policies, or inappropriate use of AI, could result in violations of confidentiality obligations, laws, or regulations, jeopardize our intellectual property rights, or expose our products or business systems to defects and malware, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Many of our products and services incorporate or depend on open source software components, which are governed by various open source licenses. Read more
Some of these licenses may require, as a condition of use, modification, or distribution, that we make available the source code of our proprietary software or derivative works. While we maintain policies and procedures designed to monitor and control the use of open source software in our products and in any third-party software that is incorporated into our products, and ensure compliance with applicable licenses, these controls may not be effective in all cases. If we inadvertently use open source software in a manner that triggers such disclosure obligations, we could be required to publicly disclose portions of our proprietary code, which could result in a loss of competitive advantage and intellectual property rights, which could adversely…
We have divested, and may in the future divest, businesses, product lines, or other assets as part of our ongoing business strategy. Read more
If we fail to successfully execute and manage these divestitures, if a divestiture does not yield the anticipated financial or operational benefits, or if the businesses or assets we divest have unexpected legal, financial, or operational liabilities, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be adversely affected.
Further, if investors or analysts do not like or understand the divestiture or if they believe we did not receive a fair price for the business or assets, they may sell their shares or alter their view of our prospects, which could cause our share price to decline.
No longer in the text (3)
Increased scrutiny and expectations around environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) matters may require us to incur additional costs or otherwise adversely impact our reputation, business, and prospects.
Our stakeholders, including investors, customers, suppliers, and employees, are placing greater emphasis on our ESG performance and transparency. Read more
This increasing stakeholder attention to and expectations around ESG matters, particularly sustainability matters, and our response to the same, may result in higher costs (including higher costs related to compliance, stakeholder engagement, and contracting), adversely impact our reputation, or otherwise negatively affect our business performance and prospects.
Our statements about our sustainability, environmental and human capital initiatives and goals, and progress against those goals, may be based on standards for measuring progress that are still developing, internal controls and processes that continue to evolve, and assumptions that are subject to change. If our related data, processing and reporting are incomplete or otherwise inaccurate, or if we fail to achieve progress on our stated targets or initiatives when or as expected, our business, financial condition, operating results, and prospects could be adversely affected.
Matched automatically, quoted as filed, and may include rewording of an existing risk. Compares Item 1A of the 10-K filed Nov 21, 2025 ↗ with the 10-K filed Nov 14, 2024 ↗.
26
What to watch going forwardSite analysis
- Shareholder vote and regulatory approvals for the Schneider merger.
- ARR growth.
- FY2026 10-K (fiscal year ended September 30, 2026).
27
Source documentsShow
This page's financial figures come from the Form 10-Ks listed below. Check the original filings for full detail.
Other sources referenced in the analysis
Last updated
Analysis last edited: November 1, 2026 · Financial data fetched: November 1, 2026 09:49 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: November 21, 2025
Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2025-11-21Proxy statement (2025)
Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.
This page is this site’s own analysis based on public information, and does not represent PTC Inc.’s views. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and this site does not guarantee the accuracy of any figure or statement here. Always verify against the original source documents before making an investment decision.