NASDAQ: DXCM · Health Care Equipment
Dexcom
Dexcom makes continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for people with diabetes. Its products include the Dexcom G7, the G7 15 Day (launched late 2025) and Stelo, an over-the-counter glucose biosensor launched in August 2024. 2025 revenue rose 16% to $4.66 billion, net income was $836 million, and international markets made up about 28% of revenue. Most sales go through distributors; three customers each accounted for 35–55% of revenue (gross of rebates). Jake Leach became CEO on January 1, 2026. In March 2025 the FDA issued a warning letter about its San Diego and Mesa facilities. In Q2 2026 revenue grew 13% to $1.31 billion, and Dexcom raised its 2026 revenue guidance midpoint to $5.18–5.25 billion.
Last updated
Analysis last edited: November 6, 2026 · Financial data fetched: October 17, 2026 10:21 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: February 12, 2026
Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-02-1210-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) · filed 2026-10-29
Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.
01
At a glanceFrom SEC data
Eight headline measures, each placed among the companies covered on this site.
- Revenue growthCAGRSmooths out year-to-year swings into "grew X% a year on average." Makes growth pace comparable across companies of very different sizes.
- 19.3%
- Operating marginOperating marginHow many cents of operating profit are left per dollar of revenue. Reflects pricing power and cost structure.
- 19.6%
- ROIC minus WACCROIC − WACC spreadThe difference between ROIC and WACC. Consistently positive implies value creation; consistently negative implies value destruction.
- +6.4 pts
- Net debt ÷ EBITDAEBITDAOperating income with D&A added back. A rough proxy for cash-generating power that’s less distorted by capital intensity, depreciation method, or financing/tax differences than net income.
- -0.7x
- Cash conversionOperating CF ÷ net income (cash conversion)How much of reported profit shows up as actual cash. 1x or higher means profit is backed by cash.
- 1.72x
- Dividend raisesDividend per shareTotal annual dividend paid per share (sum of all declared payments for the year).
- —
- P/E todayP/EShare price ÷ EPS — how many years of current earnings the stock price represents. This site uses the period-end figure as reported in the filing.
- 34.0x
- Betaβ (beta)How much a stock moves, on average, for a 1% move in the overall market. Above 1 means more volatile than the market, which raises the return shareholders require. This site computes it from about 2.5 years (roughly 130 weeks) of weekly returns, built from Yahoo Finance daily prices, regressed against an S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy, then applies the well-known long-run mean-reversion adjustment (0.67 × β + 0.33) as the WACC default.
- 1.05
Higher than 86% of 372 non-financial companies
Average yearly growth over the years shown
Higher than 53% of 311 non-financial companies
Latest fiscal year (FY2025)
Higher than 61% of 311 non-financial companies
Return on capital above (or below) its estimated cost
Higher than 11% of 304 non-financial companies
Below 0 means more cash than debt
Higher than 60% of 349 non-financial companies
Operating cash flow ÷ net income
Years the dividend per share rose, of the last 5
Latest close 2026-11-04; trailing 12 months to 2026-09-30
Above 1 = moves more than the market
Each marker shows where this company sits among the non-financial companies covered on this site, not all listed companies (left = lowest, right = highest). A high position is not automatically good — for net debt ÷ EBITDA, higher means more debt. Details and formulas are in the sections below and in How to read this.
02
Valuation todayFrom SEC data
Price-based measures at the latest close, next to the same measures at the last fiscal year-end.
Share price$87.55close on 2026-11-04
Market cap$33.69B
- P/EP/EShare price ÷ EPS — how many years of current earnings the stock price represents. This site uses the period-end figure as reported in the filing. today
- 34.0x
- P/BP/BShare price ÷ book value per share. Below 1x means the market values the company below its accounting net worth. This site uses the closing price nearest the fiscal year-end and highlights sub-1x readings. today
- 12.3x
- EV/EBITDAEV/EBITDAEnterprise value (≈ market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash) as a multiple of EBITDA — roughly, "how many years of EBITDA to buy the whole company." Lower is generally viewed as cheaper, and it’s more comparable than P/E across companies with different debt loads or depreciation policies. This site excludes noncontrolling interests from the EV calculation. today
- 28.3x
- FCF yieldFree cash flow (FCF)Operating CF minus capital expenditures — cash generated by the business after funding its own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. Acquisitions and securities purchases (also in investing CF) are not subtracted, so FCF can be positive in a year when total investing CF exceeds operating CF. today
- 3.2%
- Dividend yieldDividend per shareTotal annual dividend paid per share (sum of all declared payments for the year). today
- —
At FY2025 year-end: 31.8x
Earnings: trailing 12 months to 2026-09-30
At FY2025 year-end: 9.3x
Book value at FY2025 year-end
At FY2025 year-end: 22.2x
EBITDA for FY2025
At FY2025 year-end: 4.2%
Free cash flow for FY2025
Dividends per share for FY2025
“Today” uses the latest closing price (2026-11-04, Yahoo Finance daily closing prices) and shares outstanding at the last fiscal year-end. The rest of this page — including the financial table and ROIC vs. WACC — uses fiscal year-end prices. These are reference figures, not a judgment of whether the stock is cheap or expensive.
03
What changed since last earningsFrom SEC data
The latest reported quarter against the same quarter a year earlier, the balance sheet against the previous quarter-end, and what management said in its latest earnings release.
Quarter ended Sep 30, 2026.
- Revenue$1.21B → $1.34B (vs. a year earlier)↑ +11.2%$1.21B → $1.34B (vs. a year earlier)
- Operating margin20.1% → 24.3% (vs. a year earlier)↑ +4.3 pts20.1% → 24.3% (vs. a year earlier)
- Net income$284M → $275M (vs. a year earlier)↓ −3.1%$284M → $275M (vs. a year earlier)
- Diluted EPS$0.70 → $0.72 (vs. a year earlier)↑ +2.9%$0.70 → $0.72 (vs. a year earlier)
- Cash$1.11B → $961M (vs. previous quarter-end)↓ −13.0%$1.11B → $961M (vs. previous quarter-end)
Source: Form 10-Q ↗ (SEC XBRL). Long-term debt is the tagged long-term debt figure and leaves out short-term borrowings.
From the earnings release of Oct 29, 2026.
Management outlook ↑ Raised
Raised the midpoint of fiscal 2026 revenue guidance. Source sentence
Dexcom is raising the midpoint of fiscal year 2026 Revenue guidance, reiterating fiscal year 2026 Non-GAAP Gross Profit Margin guidance, and increasing fiscal year 2026 guidance for Non-GAAP Operating Margin and Adjusted EBITDA Margin to the following levels:
Key changes
Q3 revenue up 11% to $1.344B. Source sentence
Revenue grew 11% year-over-year to $1.344 billion on a reported basis and 11% year-over-year on an organic 1 basis.
Share repurchase authorization of up to $1.0B. Source sentence
The company also announced a share repurchase authorization of up to $1.0 billion in conjunction with third quarter results.
Written by AI. A line appears only if its figures and direction match the quoted sentence, which an automatic check confirms. Companies' outlooks are their own and may not be met. Read the release ↗
04
Company profileFrom SEC dataShow
- Legal name
- DEXCOM INC
- Headquarters
- SAN DIEGO, CA
- Incorporated in
- Delaware
- Fiscal year end
- 12/31
- Exchange & ticker
- NASDAQ: DXCM
- Industry
- Health Care Equipment
- CIK
- 1093557
- Website
- https://www.dexcom.com/ ↗
Workforce (as of FY2025 year-end)
Employees
11,100
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) cover page and business description
05
Earnings calendarFrom SEC dataShow
When the company reports each quarter: the quarter-end date, the day results were released, and when the 10-Q or 10-K was filed.
Next report
Q4 FY2026
Quarter end: December 2026. In past years, Q4 results were released 39–44 days after quarter end (Feb 12, 2026; Feb 13, 2025; Feb 8, 2024). No date has been announced in the sources this site uses.
Reporting pattern
- Fiscal year ends around December 31.
- Reports four times a year: three quarterly reports (10-Q) and an annual report (10-K) for Q4.
- Earnings releases came 24–44 days after quarter end over the last 12 quarters.
| Quarter | Quarter ended | Earnings release (8-K) | Report filed (10-Q / 10-K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 FY2026 | Sep 30, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 (+29 days) | Oct 29, 2026 10-Q (+29 days) |
| Q2 FY2026 | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 (+30 days) | Jul 30, 2026 10-Q (+30 days) |
| Q1 FY2026 | Mar 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 (+30 days) | Apr 30, 2026 10-Q (+30 days) |
| Q4 FY2025 | Dec 31, 2025 | Feb 12, 2026 (+43 days) | Feb 12, 2026 10-K (+43 days) |
| Q3 FY2025 | Sep 30, 2025 | Oct 30, 2025 (+30 days) | Oct 30, 2025 10-Q (+30 days) |
| Q2 FY2025 | Jun 30, 2025 | Jul 30, 2025 (+30 days) | Jul 30, 2025 10-Q (+30 days) |
| Q1 FY2025 | Mar 31, 2025 | May 1, 2025 (+31 days) | May 1, 2025 10-Q (+31 days) |
| Q4 FY2024 | Dec 31, 2024 | Feb 13, 2025 (+44 days) | Feb 18, 2025 10-K (+49 days) |
| Q3 FY2024 | Sep 30, 2024 | Oct 24, 2024 (+24 days) | Oct 24, 2024 10-Q (+24 days) |
| Q2 FY2024 | Jun 30, 2024 | Jul 25, 2024 (+25 days) | Jul 25, 2024 10-Q (+25 days) |
| Q1 FY2024 | Mar 31, 2024 | Apr 25, 2024 (+25 days) | Apr 25, 2024 10-Q (+25 days) |
| Q4 FY2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | Feb 8, 2024 (+39 days) | Feb 8, 2024 10-K (+39 days) |
Source: SEC EDGAR filing history. Release dates are the dates the earnings release was furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K (Item 2.02), which is normally the day results are announced. For a quarter whose 10-Q or 10-K isn’t filed yet, the date is the latest Item 2.02 8-K since the previous report, which may be a preliminary or other results-related update. Fiscal years are labeled by the calendar year in which they end.
06
Flagship products & servicesSite analysis
CGM
Dexcom G7 / G7 15 Day
Latest generation CGM systems (2023 and late 2025).
CGM
Stelo
Over-the-counter glucose biosensor for adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes not using insulin.
CGM
Dexcom ONE / ONE+
From the FY2025 Form 10-K and Q3 2026 release.
U.S. and worldwide share of flagship products/services
The filings reviewed give no market share figure for the company's products or services.
Reviewed: Form 10-K (FY2025) · Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30)
07
Recent strategic focusSite analysis
Recent developments.
CEO transition
Jacob (Jake) Leach became President and CEO on January 1, 2026; Kevin Sayer became Executive Chairman.
Source: 8-K filed 2025-12-22
Q3 2026
Revenue $1.344B (+11%); U.S. +14%, international +5%; GAAP operating margin 24.3%; net income $275.1M. Dexcom redesigned Stelo and obtained its first two international clearances for the G7 15 Day system.
Source: Q3 2026 earnings release; Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30)
Buyback
New $1.0B share repurchase program through June 30, 2027 (May 2026).
Source: 8-K filed 2026-05-15
Management
CFO Jereme Sylvain also became COO (September 2026).
Source: 8-K filed 2026-09-14
Capex ÷ D&A (FY2025)
1.44x
Well above depreciation — expansion-stage investment
formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization
e.g.$364M ÷ $252M = 1.44x
termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
R&D-to-revenue ratio (FY2025)
12.9%
formularesearch & development expense ÷ revenue × 100
e.g.$599M ÷ $4,662M × 100 = 12.9%
M&A spend (6-year total)
$34M
Latest year: $0
Cash-flow-statement spending on acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Where the money goes, over time
Unit: $M. Capex went from $199M in FY2020 to $364M in FY2025
- Capex
- R&D
- M&A spend
formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization
termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-12
08
Key figures at a glanceFrom SEC data
FY2020–FY2025, 6 years.
Revenue (FY2025)
$4.66B
As reported in the 10-K
Revenue CAGR (5 years)
+19.3%▲favorable
formula(last-period revenue ÷ first-period revenue) ^ (1 ÷ years) − 1
e.g.($4,662M ÷ $1,927M) ^ (1÷5) − 1 = 19.3%
termsCAGR · ^ (exponent) · Revenue (net sales)
Operating margin (FY2025)
19.6%▲favorable
+4.0pt vs. 5 years ago
formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100
e.g.$912M ÷ $4,662M × 100 = 19.6%
ROE (FY2025)
34.5%▲favorable
6-year average: 25.3%
As reported in the 10-K
P/B (FY2025 end)
9.30x
formulafiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share
e.g.$66.37 ÷ $7.14 = 9.30x
Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's P/B
EV/EBITDA (FY2025 end)
22.2x
formula(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization)
e.g.($25,539M + $1,241M − $918M) ÷ ($912M + $252M) = 22.2x
termsEV/EBITDA · Market capitalization · Interest-bearing debt · EBITDA · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's multiple
- ▲
Revenue grew +19.3% a year over 5 years (strong growth)
From $1.93B in FY2020 to $4.66B in FY2025. The annualized rate (CAGR) makes it possible to compare growth pace across companies of different sizes.
- ▲
Operating margin improved: 15.5% → 19.6%
How much operating profit is left per $100 of revenue. It moved +4.0 points over 5 years — pricing power, cost control, and product mix all show up here.
- ―
Equity ratio is 43.3% (a middling level)
The share of total assets funded by equity rather than debt. 50%+ is often read as low bankruptcy risk, though the right level varies by industry (real estate and leasing run lower, for instance).
- ▲
Free cash flow was positive in 6 of 6 years
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures: the cash left over after funding the business’s own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. A negative year can mean heavy investment, or weak core earnings — worth distinguishing.
- ▲
ROE averaged 25.3% over 6 years (latest: 34.5%)
How much profit was generated on shareholders’ equity. Roughly 10%+ is often cited as solid for a U.S. company, though this varies a lot by industry and capital intensity.
09
Business modelSite analysis
Business Model Canvas
The whole company in nine blocks. Left side: how it delivers (partners, activities, resources, costs). Right side: who it serves and how it earns. Every entry comes from the company’s filings shown on this page.
08 · who helps
Key partners
No partners or suppliers named in the filings.
07 · what it does
Key activities
- Design, manufacturing, sales to clinicians and consumers
06 · what it draws on
Key resources
- Sensor manufacturing (U.S. and international sites)
- R&D ($599M in 2025)
02 · why customers buy
Value propositions
- Continuous glucose monitoring with real-time alerts and multi-device integration, which differentiate it from finger-stick testing.
04 · how it keeps them
Customer relationships
- Recurring sensor replacements and software (Clarity, Follow, Share) used daily by people with diabetes.
03 · how it reaches them
Channels
- Mostly distributors and pharmacies, plus some direct sales; Medicare business through distributors since 2020.
01 · who it serves
Customer segments
- Distributors (85% of revenue)
- Direct customers
- Over-the-counter consumers (Stelo)
09 · where money goes
Cost structure
FY2025, share of revenue ($4.66B)
- Cost of revenue39.9%
- Research & development12.9%
- Selling, general & administrative27.7%
Operating profit left: 19.6% of revenue. Depreciation & amortization (inside the costs above): $252M. Capital spending: $364M.
Source: Form 10-K income statement and cash-flow statement (SEC XBRL).
05 · how money comes in
Revenue streams
- U.S. $3.33B
- International $1.33B (2025)
Value propositions, channels and customer relationships: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Sells CGM sensors, systems and software (Dexcom Clarity, Follow, Share) mostly through distributors, plus some direct sales, to people with diabetes and prediabetes.
01 what it draws on
Inputs & resources
- Sensor manufacturing (U.S. and international sites)
- R&D ($599M in 2025)
02 what it does
Activities
- Design, manufacturing, sales to clinicians and consumers
03 who it serves
Customers
- Distributors (85% of revenue)
- Direct customers
- Over-the-counter consumers (Stelo)
04 how money comes in
How it earns
- U.S. $3.33B
- International $1.33B (2025)
How the business makes money
- Seasonally weaker first quarter, tied to U.S. insurance deductible resets.
- In 2026 the CONNECT trial showed CGM benefits for people with type 2 diabetes who do not use insulin.
Government & regulation around the business
Non-market factors from the company’s filings: what governments and regulators fund, buy, set, approve or restrict, and which part of the flow above each one touches.
Dexcom’s CGM launches depend on FDA marketing authorization.
Approvals & licenses
FDA authorization
Obtained FDA marketing authorization for G7 through the 510(k) process in December 2022; each new device needs clearance, de novo authorization or approval.
Supports and constrainsTouches: ActivitiesSource: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Trade & export rules
Sanctions and export rules
Subject to OFAC sanctions and Bureau of Industry and Security export rules.
Constrains the businessTouches: CustomersSource: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Revenue by segment (FY2025)
Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue
United States — distributor
3,195.7 (69%)United States — direct
139.2 (3%)International — distributor
763.3 (16%)International — direct
563.8 (12%)
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) — revenue disaggregation Dexcom reports one segment; revenue shown by sales channel and region.
10
Where it earnsSite analysis
Many U.S.-listed companies earn most of their revenue outside the U.S. — this breaks down revenue by country/region so it's clear where the business actually makes its money.
Largest market (FY2025)
United States — 72% of revenue
Revenue by country / region (FY2025)
Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue
United States
3,334.9 (72%)International
1,327.1 (28%)
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
11
Contract structureSite analysisShow
Short-term or spot sales carry different earnings quality than long-term or auto-renewing contracts — this shows how the company actually contracts with its customers.
12
Customers & suppliersSite analysis
Who the company sells to and buys from. Companies rarely name either, so named counterparties come only from the company's own filings and press releases; otherwise this lists the concentration figures the 10-K discloses.
Customers
Distributors, pharmacies and direct customers; ultimately people with diabetes.
Named by the company
The three major customers are not named (Customers A, B, C).
Suppliers
Components and materials for sensors.
Named by the company
The 10-K doesn't name suppliers.
13
Competitors & peersSite analysis
Competitors the 10-K names, and the peer group the company itself chose in its proxy statement. Nothing here is this site's own pick.
The 10-K names its direct glucose monitoring competitors.
Competitors named in the 10-K
Glucose monitoring
- Abbott Laboratoriessite ↗
- Medtronicsite ↗
- MiniMedsite ↗
- Rochesite ↗
- LifeScansite ↗
- Ascensia Diabetes Caresite ↗
Plus other smaller entrants and companies developing CGM products.
Peer group the company chose
Fiscal 2025 compensation peer group, from the proxy statement. Peers are companies the board considers comparable — for example when setting executive pay — not necessarily direct competitors.
Medtech, life science and high-growth technology companies at 0.5–2.5x Dexcom's revenue. Moderna and Workday were added; Splunk was removed.
- Agilent Technologiessite ↗
- IDEXX Laboratoriessite ↗
- Align Technologysite ↗
- Illuminasite ↗
- Amgensite ↗
- Insuletsite ↗
- BioMarin Pharmaceuticalsite ↗
- Intuitive Surgicalsite ↗
- Boston Scientificsite ↗
- Modernasite ↗
- DocuSignsite ↗
- ResMedsite ↗
- Edwards Lifesciencessite ↗
- Veeva Systemssite ↗
- Exact Sciencessite ↗
- Workdaysite ↗
- Hologicsite ↗
- Zimmer Biometsite ↗
Company names link to this site’s analysis where one exists; “site ↗” opens the company’s own website.
14
Six years of financialsFrom SEC data
Each chart's axis holds a single unit (never mixing dollars, %, and $/share). The table's per-period header links to the filing the numbers came from.
Revenue over time
Unit: $M
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-12
Profit over time (operating → net)
Unit: $M
- Operating income
- Pretax income
- Net income
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-12
Margins over time
Unit: %
- Operating margin
- Net margin
formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100
formulanet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100
Cash flow over time
Unit: $M (below zero = cash went out)
- Operating CF
- Investing CF
- Free CF
formulacash flow from operations − capital expenditures
termsFree cash flow (FCF) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Capital expenditures (capex)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-12
Financial stability & capital efficiency
Unit: %
- Equity ratio
- ROE
formulatotal equity ÷ total assets × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)
termsStockholders’ equity · Total assets
formulanet income ÷ average equity (beginning + ending, ÷2) × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)
termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Stockholders’ equity
Earnings per share (EPS) and dividend per share
Unit: $
- EPS
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-12
| Line item | FY202010-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202110-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202210-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202310-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202410-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202510-K on EDGAR ↗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement ($M) | ||||||
| Revenue | 1,927 | 2,449 | 2,910 | 3,622 | 4,033 | 4,662 |
| Operating income | 300 | 266 | 391 | 598 | 600 | 912 |
| Pretax income | 298 | 257 | 391 | 710 | 709 | 1,088 |
| Net income (attributable) | 550 | 217 | 341 | 542 | 576 | 836 |
| Revenue growthcalc(this year’s revenue − last year’s revenue) ÷ last year’s revenue × 100 | — | 27.1% | 18.8% | 24.5% | 11.3% | 15.6% |
| Operating margincalcoperating income ÷ revenue × 100 | 15.5% | 10.9% | 13.4% | 16.5% | 14.9% | 19.6% |
| Net margincalcnet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100 | 28.5% | 8.9% | 11.7% | 14.9% | 14.3% | 17.9% |
| Balance sheet ($M) | ||||||
| Total assets | 4,291 | 4,933 | 5,392 | 6,265 | 6,485 | 6,340 |
| Total equity | 1,827 | 2,042 | 2,132 | 2,069 | 2,103 | 2,746 |
| Interest-bearing debtSum of short- and long-term borrowings, notes/bonds payable | 2,033 | 1,982 | 1,970 | 2,434 | 2,441 | 1,241 |
| Equity ratio | 36.2% | 41.4% | 39.5% | 33.0% | 32.4% | 43.3% |
| ROE | 35.4% | 12.1% | 16.3% | 25.8% | 27.6% | 34.5% |
| Cash flow ($M) | ||||||
| Operating CF | 476 | 443 | 670 | 749 | 990 | 1,441 |
| Investing CF | -1,018 | -216 | -521 | -507 | -207 | 536 |
| Financing CF | 912 | 10 | -552 | -319 | -735 | -1,686 |
| Free cash flowcalccash flow from operations − capital expenditures | 277 | 53 | 305 | 512 | 631 | 1,077 |
| Cash and equivalents | 818 | 1,053 | 642 | 566 | 606 | 918 |
| Per share & other | ||||||
| EPS ($) | 1.33 | 0.53 | 0.82 | 1.30 | 1.42 | 2.09 |
| BVPS ($) | 4.03 | 5.26 | 5.52 | 5.37 | 5.38 | 7.14 |
| P/E (x) | 69.5 | 253.3 | 138.1 | 95.5 | 54.8 | 31.8 |
| EV/EBITDA (x)calc(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization) | 100.2 | 144.1 | 82.4 | 63.4 | 39.4 | 22.2 |
| P/B (x)calcfiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share | 22.96 | 25.51 | 20.52 | 23.12 | 14.45 | 9.30 |
P/B and EV/EBITDA use each period’s period-end (fiscal year-end) figures, not the current share price. Figures without a "calc" tag are as reported in the Form 10-K (the consolidated financial statements and, for older years, earlier 10-Ks), pulled automatically from SEC EDGAR. Where a later filing restated a prior period, the restated figure is used.
Last 8 quarters
Three-month figures from 10-Q filings. Change is versus the same quarter a year earlier. Newest quarter on top.
| Quarter ended | Revenue | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | $1.34B+11.2% | $327M+34.9% | $275M-3.1% | $0.72 |
| 2026-06-30 | $1.31B+13.1% | $318M+49.7% | $249M+38.5% | $0.64 |
| 2026-03-31 | $1.19B+15.0% | $255M+90.9% | $200M+89.3% | $0.51 |
| 2025-12-31 † | $1.26B+13.1% | $323M+71.0% | $267M+76.2% | — |
| 2025-09-30 | $1.21B | $243M | $284M | $0.70 |
| 2025-06-30 | $1.16B | $213M | $180M | $0.45 |
| 2025-03-31 | $1.04B | $134M | $105M | $0.27 |
| 2024-12-31 † | $1.11B | $189M | $152M | — |
† Fourth quarter = the 10-K’s annual figure minus the first three quarters; quarterly EPS isn’t derived this way because share counts change during the year.
15
Is ROIC above WACC?From SEC data
ROIC (the return on money invested in the business) above WACC (the cost of raising that money) means the company is creating value. WACC is an estimate, so its assumptions can be adjusted below.
ROIC (FY2025)
16.7%
formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)
e.g.$912M × (1 − 22%) ÷ $4,265M × 100 = 16.7%
termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity
WACC (this site’s estimate)
10.27%
formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight
e.g.Equity weight: $25.54B ÷ ($25.54B + $1.24B) = 95.4%
e.g.Debt weight: $1.24B ÷ ($25.54B + $1.24B) = 4.6%
e.g.WACC: 10.7% × 95.4% + 1.2% × (1 − 22%) × 4.6% = 10.27%
termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization
How firm is this? With the equity risk premium ±1 point and beta ±0.2, WACC runs 8.4%–12.5% and ROIC − WACC runs +4.2 to +8.3 points. The sign holds across this range. This describes the latest year and does not predict future value creation.
WACC 10.27% is this site’s estimate under the assumptions below (not a figure the company has published)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.95% (10-year Treasury, 2026-11-03)
- β
- 1.05 (price-derived adjusted beta)
- Equity risk premium
- 5.5%
- Cost of equity
- 10.73%
- Cost of debt
- 1.15%
- Tax rate
- 22% (effective rate, FY2023–FY2025)
- Capital structure (equity : debt)
- 95% : 5%
ROIC over time, vs. WACC
Unit: % — bars = each period's ROIC, horizontal line = latest WACC. Bars above the line are green, below are red
- ROIC (above WACC)
- ROIC (below WACC)
- WACC 10.27%
formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)
termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity
formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight
termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization
Try different WACC assumptions
β and the equity risk premium are estimates with a real range of plausible values — move the sliders to check whether ROIC > WACC still holds. The risk-free rate starts at the 10-year Treasury yield on 2026-11-03 (U.S. Treasury).
Initial β: 1.05 (price-derived adjusted beta. Raw β 1.07, R² 0.11, 130 weeks)
formula0.67 × β + 0.33 (β = the slope of weekly stock returns regressed on weekly market returns)
e.g.0.67 × 1.072 + 0.33 = 1.048
termsβ (beta)
Period 2024-05-10–2026-11-04, using S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy. Source: Yahoo Finance price history.
formularisk-free rate + β × equity risk premium
e.g.5.0% + 1.05 × 5.5% = 10.7%
termsCAPM · Risk-free rate · β (beta) · Equity risk premium (market risk premium)
formulafiscal year-end closing price × shares outstanding (= market cap)
formulainterest expense ÷ interest-bearing debt × 100 (clamped to 0–10%; falls back to the risk-free rate if there’s no debt)
16
What the price implies (DCF)From SEC data
A company's value can be written as its free cash flow divided by (cost of capital − perpetual growth). Working that backwards from the market's valuation shows how much growth the share price assumed — compared here with the company's actual past growth.
Growth the price implies (price on 2026-11-04)
7.0%
Perpetual FCF growth: g = r − FCF ÷ EV = 10.3% − 3.3%
Past FCF growth (FY2020–FY2025)
+31.2%
Compound annual rate, 5 years
Past revenue growth (FY2020–FY2025)
+19.3%
Compound annual rate, 5 years
Inputs (FY2025): free cash flow $1.08B (operating CF − capex); enterprise value $32.93B = market cap $33.69B (latest close, 2026-11-04) + debt $1.24B − cash and short-term investments $2B; r = WACC of 10.3% using this page’s default assumptions (β 1.05, risk-free 5.0%, market premium 5.5%).
Three WACC scenarios
The same calculation under cautious, base and optimistic cost-of-capital assumptions (risk-free rate fixed at the 10-year Treasury yield). Pick one to load it into the sliders below.
Try your own assumptions
V = FCF ÷ (r − g). It starts at the implied growth rate, where the theoretical value equals today’s enterprise value.
Theoretical enterprise value
$32.64B
FCF $1.08B ÷ (10.3% − 7.0%)
Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value
0.99x
Below 1x: these assumptions value the business below the market did
How sensitive the answer is
Theoretical ÷ actual enterprise value for each combination of r and g.
| g \ r | 8.3% | 9.3% | 10.3% | 11.3% | 12.3% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0.39x | 0.35x | 0.32x | 0.29x | 0.27x |
| 2% | 0.52x | 0.45x | 0.39x | 0.35x | 0.32x |
| 4% | 0.76x | 0.62x | 0.52x | 0.45x | 0.39x |
| 6% | 1.42x | 0.99x | 0.76x | 0.62x | 0.52x |
| 8% | 10.90x | 2.52x | 1.42x | 0.99x | 0.76x |
A simplified model for seeing what the market price assumes, not a forecast or a target price. It treats free cash flow as growing at one constant rate forever; the result swings widely with small changes in r and g, and is undefined when g reaches r. Free cash flow here is operating cash flow minus capex, which is after interest — a full DCF of enterprise value would use cash flow before interest. Market cap uses the latest close (2026-11-04) × shares at fiscal year-end; free cash flow and WACC inputs are from the latest fiscal year.
17
Earnings qualityFrom SEC dataShow
The same reported profit can mean different things depending on whether it's backed by cash, driven by the core business, or the result of a one-off item. Four checks below.
- ✓
Operating CF ÷ net income: averages 1.61x
Profit is backed by cash coming in.
- ✓
Accrual ratio (latest): -9.4%
A small share of profit rests on accounting estimates.
- ✓
Core-earnings share (operating income ÷ pretax income): 84%
Most profit comes from core operations.
- ✓
Days sales outstanding: 81 → 87 days
No major slowdown in collecting on sales.
Operating CF vs. net income
Unit: $M — operating CF above net income means profit is backed by cash
- Operating CF
- Net income
formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company
termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)
formula(net income − operating CF) ÷ average total assets × 100
termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Total assets
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-12
Profit bridge (FY2025)
Unit: $M — what moved profit from operating income to net income
- Profit (each stage)
- Pushed profit up
- Pushed profit down
formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100
termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-02-12
Receivables & inventory days
Unit: days — days grow when receivables or inventory build up faster than sales
- Days sales outstanding
- Days inventory outstanding
formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365
formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365
termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)
Worked examples (latest period)
formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company
e.g.$1,441M ÷ $836M = 1.72x
termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)
formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100
e.g.$912M ÷ $1,088M × 100 = 84%
termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)
formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365
e.g.($1,006M + $1,216M) ÷ 2 ÷ $4,662M × 365 = 87 days
formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365
e.g.($543M + $629M) ÷ 2 ÷ $1,860M × 365 = 115 days
termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)
18
Who holds the sharesFrom SEC dataShow
How much of the stock large institutional investors report owning on SEC Form 13F, how much the directors and executive officers hold (and how much of the vote they control), and roughly how much is left for individual investors. Shown next to beta so the holder mix can be read alongside how much the stock swings.
Institutions, insiders and everyone else, 13F holdings as of 2026-06-30
“Everyone else” is what remains after shares reported on Form 13F and shares held by directors and executive officers: mostly individual investors, plus non-insider families or foundations and smaller or foreign institutions. The figures have different dates and 13F reports count some shares twice — read it as an approximate split.
- Held by 13F filers
- 100%+
- Directors & officers (shares)
- <1%
- Everyone else (est.)
- ≈0%
- Directors & officers (voting power)
- <1%
- Institutional-ownership rank
- 40 of 416
- Beta (adjusted)
- 1.05
Reported total 102.5%
individuals and other non-13F holders
no separate voting figure; shown as shares
1 = most institutional; 9% of covered companies have more
above 1 = swings more than the market
- 386.7M shares reported by 972 13F filers ÷ 377.4M shares outstanding on 2026-07-23. Option positions are excluded.
- The 13F total exceeds shares outstanding because some shares are reported twice — for example shares lent to short sellers and then bought by another manager, or holdings that overlapping managers both report.
- Directors and executive officers as a group, from the proxy statement’s beneficial-ownership table; includes shares they can acquire within 60 days.
- A large “everyone else” share can still reflect a family, trust or foundation stake held outside the board; check the proxy statement’s 5% holders.
Sources: SEC Form 13F data set (holdings as of 2026-06-30) · Form DEF 14A filed 2026-04-15 (beneficial ownership table) · Form 10-Q cover page (shares outstanding as of 2026-07-23)
19
Strengths & weaknessesSite analysis
Strengths
1. Revenue growth
Revenue rose from $2.45B (2021) to $4.66B (2025).
Evidence: SEC EDGAR XBRL
2. Margin expansion
Q3 2026 GAAP operating margin of 24.3%, up 420 basis points.
Evidence: Q3 2026 earnings release
3. New markets
Stelo targets non-insulin users; the CONNECT trial, published in The New England Journal of Medicine after Q3 2026, supports G7 use in type 2 diabetes not on insulin.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025); Q3 2026 earnings release
Weaknesses
1. FDA warning letter
In March 2025 the FDA cited manufacturing and quality system non-conformities at the San Diego and Mesa facilities.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
2. Customer concentration
A few distributors account for most revenue.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
20
What draws investors to itSite analysis
Why the stock can look attractive to investors — each point paired with what has to hold for it to stay true, and the opposing view. This is this site's analysis, not a recommendation to buy or sell.
P/E (FY2025)
31.8x
Price at fiscal year-end ÷ diluted EPS
Dividend yield (FY2025)
—
Dividends per share ÷ fiscal year-end price
Payout ratio (FY2025)
—
Dividends per share ÷ diluted EPS
FCF yield (FY2025)
4.2%
(Operating CF − capex) ÷ market cap
1. Growth plus profitability
Net income rose from $217M (2021) to $836M (2025).
- What has to hold
- CGM adoption keeps expanding.
- The other side
- Competition and pricing pressure.
Evidence: SEC EDGAR XBRL
2. Buybacks
$1.0B authorization in 2026.
- What has to hold
- Cash flow keeps growing.
- The other side
- No dividend.
Evidence: 8-K filed 2026-05-15
Dexcom pays no dividend. Short-term marketable securities for 2024–2025 are taken from the FY2025 balance sheet.
21
ResilienceSite analysisShow
How well the company could absorb a bad year: its financial buffer, how its revenue and profit held up in the worst year on record, and what the 10-K says about the business's exposure to shocks. Figures and filing statements only — no overall rating.
1. Financial buffer (FY2025)
Cash & short-term investments ÷ debt due within a year
No debt due
$2B vs. $0
Interest coverage (operating income ÷ interest expense)
63.8x
$912M vs. $14M
Free cash flow ÷ dividends paid
—
2. Worst year in the record, and the recovery
| Figure | Worst year-over-year change | Back to the prior level? |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | No decline in the record | — |
| Operating income | -11.3% in FY2021 ($300M → $266M) | Yes, by FY2022 |
Covers only the 6 fiscal years on record (FY2020–FY2025), which may not include a full recession — the worst year here isn’t necessarily how the company would fare in a severe downturn.
3. Business resilience (from the 10-K)
Liquidity
$918M cash and $1.08B short-term marketable securities at the end of 2025.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Debt reduction
Interest-bearing debt fell from $2.44B (2024) to $1.24B (2025).
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL
22
Legal & regulatory mattersSite analysisShow
Lawsuits, government investigations, enforcement actions and settlements the company discloses — where each stands, what is at stake, and what comes next. From the 10-K's Legal Proceedings and contingencies note, the latest 10-Q, and 8-Ks.
Dexcom faces two securities class actions, one over 2024 revenue guidance and one over G7 accuracy and reliability, plus related derivative suits. Product users have also filed G6/G7 class actions.
3 open matters
G7 securities class action
PendingClass actionPrime v. Dexcom (S.D.N.Y.)
Alleges misleading statements from July 2024 to September 2025 on the accuracy, reliability and functionality of the G7, and on its enhancements and manufacturing. An amended complaint was filed April 10, 2026, and Dexcom moved to dismiss June 9, 2026.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) — Legal Proceedings
G6 and G7 user class actions
PendingClass actionIn re Dexcom CGM Litigation (S.D. Cal., consolidated May 15, 2026); Chatelain v. Dexcom (L.A. Superior Court)
Six putative class actions filed from September 2025 by purported users of G6 or G7 devices.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) — Legal Proceedings
2024 revenue guidance securities class action
On appealClass actionIn re Dexcom, Inc. Class Action Securities Litigation (S.D. Cal.)
Alleges misleading statements from April 2023 to July 2024 about fiscal 2024 revenue and growth. On August 27, 2026 the court dismissed the case with prejudice; the lead plaintiff appealed to the Ninth Circuit in September 2026. Related derivative suits are stayed.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) — Legal Proceedings
Company statement: Dexcom cannot estimate the outcome of these matters and is not aware of other material pending proceedings.
Based on Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-30) — Legal Proceedings, reviewed 2026-10-18. Routine ordinary-course claims are not listed. “Major” is this site’s judgment of which matters could materially affect results.
23
Risks (including geopolitical)Site analysis
Starting from the 10-K's Risk Factors section, organized by category — geopolitical, currency, raw materials, regulatory, disaster, and more — with impact and likelihood assessed by this site.
Risk map
Vertical = impact on results, horizontal = likelihood. Upper right = most severe. Numbers match the list below (placement is this site’s own assessment).
Likelihood →
"Company disclosure" vs. "this site’s assessment"
The description and mitigation for each risk are this site’s summary of the 10-K’s "Risk Factors" section. Impact and likelihood are this site’s own assessment, not the company’s — where the company discloses its own likelihood assessment, that is noted in the summary.
Impact is judged from how large the affected business is relative to total revenue/profit, and from the risk’s track record of moving results in the past. Likelihood is judged from the filing’s wording and the current business environment (already occurring, or recurring). See the rating criteria.
- 1Competition & technology shift
Intense competition
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Competes with Abbott Diabetes Care, Medtronic's diabetes business (spun off as MiniMed), Roche Diabetes Care, LifeScan, Ascensia and others.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact High / Likelihood High
- 2Governance & quality
Regulatory compliance
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Failure to respond to the FDA warning letter could restrict products.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Our compliance program includes internal audit and monitoring functions designed to identify potential issues and facilitate remediation as appropriate.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact High / Likelihood Med
- 3Customer concentration
Distributor concentration
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Three customers each represent 35–55% of revenue.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact High / Likelihood Med
- 4Supply chain
Manufacturing scale
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Insufficient capacity or disruptions could limit growth.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood Med
24
What changed in the risk factorsFrom SEC data
Paragraphs in the latest 10-K's Risk Factors that have little overlap with the year before, and paragraphs that were dropped.
New or substantially reworded (8)
In the United States and other countries, government and private sector access to health care products continues to be a subject of focus, and efforts to reduce health care costs are being made by third-party payors. Read more
Most of our customers rely on third-party payors, including government programs and private health insurance plans, to cover the cost of the G6, G7, G-7 15 Day, Dexcom One, and Dexcom ONE+. We expect that these continuing cost reduction and containment measures could result in lower prices for these products and lower reimbursement rates, as well as could lead to patients being unable to obtain approval for coverage or payment from these third-party payors resulting in costs being shifted to patients for these products. Additionally, we may experience pricing pressure if our products are increasingly subject to competitive bidding processes, which include substantial costs…
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed the budget reconciliation bill (entitled “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”, or the Bill) to meet spending targets aimed at funding the Administration’s domestic priorities that includes significant changes to the Medicaid program. Congressional Budget Office, or CBO, preliminary estimates show that the Medicaid provisions would reduce Medicaid spending by $1 trillion and will increase the number of people without health insurance by at least 11.8 million by 2034. Some key proposed changes to the Medicaid Program include, but are not limited to: work requirements; cost sharing of up to $35 per service on expansion adults who exceed the official poverty threshold; stricter eligibility requirements for non-U.S. citizens; requirements for states to conduct eligibility redeterminations at least every six months for Medicaid expansion adults; and…
From time to time, the FDA conducts inspections of our facilities and may issue Form 483 findings related to our operations and may issue warning letters or take other administrative or enforcement actions asserting noncompliance with FDA laws and regulations. In March 2025, we received an FDA warning letter following inspections of our facilities in San Diego, California, and Mesa, Arizona. In the warning letter, the FDA cited deficiencies in the response letters sent by us to the FDA following the Form 483, List of Investigational Observations that was delivered to us in connection with the inspection of our San Diego, California facility that occurred from October 2024 through November 2024, and the inspection of our Mesa, Arizona facility that occurred in June 2024. The warning letter describes observed non-conformities in manufacturing processes and our quality management system.…
While we intend to undertake certain corrective actions and provide regular updates to the FDA in order to meet the requirements set forth by FDA in the warning letter, we cannot give any assurances that the FDA will be satisfied with our response or as to the date we expect to resolve the matters included in the FDA warning letter. Until the issues cited in the warning letter are resolved to the FDA’s satisfaction, additional legal or regulatory action may be taken without further notice, including as described above.
Notably, the new bidding system for Medicare competitive bidding will contain a “country of origin” question to obtain information about where products are manufactured. Read more
It is unclear how CMS intends to use this information and what impact this could have, if any, on our offshore manufacturing activities.
Moreover, we are subject to various operational, compliance, and reputational risks associated with our adoption and utilization of AI technologies, including inaccurate or unpredictable outputs, such as errors or hallucinations, that may impair decision‑making, disrupt operations, or expose sensitive information. Integrating AI into our systems may also expand our cybersecurity attack surface, increasing exposure to data breaches, loss of intellectual property, or inadvertent disclosure of confidential data. Although we have taken steps intended to mitigate risks related to our use of AI, there can be no assurance that our use of AI will yield the anticipated benefits or that we will be able to effectively mitigate the associated risks. Externally, the rapid adoption of AI by competitors and malicious actors heightens risks as threat actors leverage AI to execute more sophisticated…
We have been involved in various patent infringement actions in the past and in 2024, we entered into a settlement and license agreement with Abbott to settle all pending patent infringement legal proceedings brought by Abbott against us. Read more
We granted Abbott and its affiliates, and Abbott and its affiliates granted us and our affiliates, a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, fully paid-up license to certain patents and patent applications relating to analyte sensing, including to all the patents asserted in the settled litigation. As part of the agreement, each party, on behalf of itself and its affiliates, also entered into a covenant not to sue until December 20, 2034, and agreed on behalf of themselves and their affiliates to refrain from challenging the patents and patent applications licensed
under the settlement agreement for periods of time which vary depending on the relevant patents or patent applications.
No longer in the text (1)
There is also a risk that due to regulatory changes or changes to federal or state law, such as suspensions on the use of NOLs, or other unforeseen reasons, our existing NOLs could expire or otherwise be unavailable either in whole or in part to offset future income tax liabilities. For example, under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020, or CARES Act, which amended certain provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or TCJA, NOLs arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2021 may be carried back to each of the five taxable years preceding the tax year of such loss, but NOLs arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020 may not be carried back. The TCJA, as amended by the CARES Act, also provides that NOLs from tax years that began after December 31, 2017 may offset no more than 80% of current taxable…
3 more paragraphs differ; the filings below have the full text.
Matched automatically, quoted as filed, and may include rewording of an existing risk. Compares Item 1A of the 10-K filed Feb 12, 2026 ↗ with the 10-K filed Feb 18, 2025 ↗.
25
What to watch going forwardSite analysis
- 2026 guidance: revenue of $5.18–5.25B; non-GAAP operating margin of about 23.5–24%.
- Resolution of the FDA warning letter.
- Stelo adoption and type 2 coverage.
26
Source documentsShow
This page's financial figures come from the Form 10-Ks listed below. Check the original filings for full detail.
Other sources referenced in the analysis
Last updated
Analysis last edited: November 6, 2026 · Financial data fetched: October 17, 2026 10:21 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: February 12, 2026
Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-02-12
Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.
This page is this site’s own analysis based on public information, and does not represent Dexcom’s views. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and this site does not guarantee the accuracy of any figure or statement here. Always verify against the original source documents before making an investment decision.