NASDAQ: INTC · Semiconductors
Intel
Intel, based in Santa Clara, California, designs and manufactures CPUs and other chips for PCs and data centers and is building a contract chipmaking (foundry) business. Its Intel Products unit comprises the Client Computing Group (CCG, $32,228 million of 2025 revenue) and Data Center and AI (DCAI, $16,919 million); Intel Foundry ($17,826 million, mostly sales to Intel Products) makes the wafers and lost $10,318 million. Revenue has fallen from $79.0 billion in 2021 to $52.9 billion in 2025, and Intel posted net losses in 2024 (−$18.8 billion) and 2025 (−$0.3 billion). In 2025 it raised capital from the U.S. government (which became one of its largest stockholders), SoftBank ($2.0 billion) and NVIDIA ($5.0 billion), sold 51% of Altera, and suspended its dividend. In 2026 it bought back Apollo's 49% stake in its Irish fab for $14.2 billion and sold 210.5 million new shares at $95.
Last updated
Analysis last edited: November 6, 2026 · Financial data fetched: October 25, 2026 09:52 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: January 23, 2026
Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-01-2310-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-26) · filed 2026-10-30Proxy statement (2026)
Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.
01
At a glanceFrom SEC data
Eight headline measures, each placed among the companies covered on this site.
- Revenue growthCAGRSmooths out year-to-year swings into "grew X% a year on average." Makes growth pace comparable across companies of very different sizes.
- -7.5%
- Operating marginOperating marginHow many cents of operating profit are left per dollar of revenue. Reflects pricing power and cost structure.
- -4.2%
- ROIC minus WACCROIC − WACC spreadThe difference between ROIC and WACC. Consistently positive implies value creation; consistently negative implies value destruction.
- -13.4 pts
- Net debt ÷ EBITDAEBITDAOperating income with D&A added back. A rough proxy for cash-generating power that’s less distorted by capital intensity, depreciation method, or financing/tax differences than net income.
- 1.1x
- Cash conversionOperating CF ÷ net income (cash conversion)How much of reported profit shows up as actual cash. 1x or higher means profit is backed by cash.
- —
- Dividend raisesDividend per shareTotal annual dividend paid per share (sum of all declared payments for the year).
- —
- P/E todayP/EShare price ÷ EPS — how many years of current earnings the stock price represents. This site uses the period-end figure as reported in the filing.
- —
- Betaβ (beta)How much a stock moves, on average, for a 1% move in the overall market. Above 1 means more volatile than the market, which raises the return shareholders require. This site computes it from about 2.5 years (roughly 130 weeks) of weekly returns, built from Yahoo Finance daily prices, regressed against an S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy, then applies the well-known long-run mean-reversion adjustment (0.67 × β + 0.33) as the WACC default.
- 1.76
Higher than 0% of 372 non-financial companies
Average yearly growth over the years shown
Higher than 2% of 311 non-financial companies
Latest fiscal year (FY2025)
Higher than 2% of 311 non-financial companies
Return on capital above (or below) its estimated cost
Higher than 38% of 304 non-financial companies
Below 0 means more cash than debt
Operating cash flow ÷ net income
Years the dividend per share rose, of the last 5
Latest close 2026-11-04; trailing 12 months to 2026-09-26
Above 1 = moves more than the market
Each marker shows where this company sits among the non-financial companies covered on this site, not all listed companies (left = lowest, right = highest). A high position is not automatically good — for net debt ÷ EBITDA, higher means more debt. Details and formulas are in the sections below and in How to read this.
02
Valuation todayFrom SEC data
Price-based measures at the latest close, next to the same measures at the last fiscal year-end.
Share price$59.59close on 2026-11-04
Market cap$297.59B
- P/EP/EShare price ÷ EPS — how many years of current earnings the stock price represents. This site uses the period-end figure as reported in the filing. today
- —
- P/BP/BShare price ÷ book value per share. Below 1x means the market values the company below its accounting net worth. This site uses the closing price nearest the fiscal year-end and highlights sub-1x readings. today
- 2.6x
- EV/EBITDAEV/EBITDAEnterprise value (≈ market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash) as a multiple of EBITDA — roughly, "how many years of EBITDA to buy the whole company." Lower is generally viewed as cheaper, and it’s more comparable than P/E across companies with different debt loads or depreciation policies. This site excludes noncontrolling interests from the EV calculation. today
- 35.9x
- FCF yieldFree cash flow (FCF)Operating CF minus capital expenditures — cash generated by the business after funding its own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. Acquisitions and securities purchases (also in investing CF) are not subtracted, so FCF can be positive in a year when total investing CF exceeds operating CF. today
- -1.7%
- Dividend yieldDividend per shareTotal annual dividend paid per share (sum of all declared payments for the year). today
- —
At FY2025 year-end: —
Earnings: trailing 12 months to 2026-09-26
At FY2025 year-end: 1.6x
Book value at FY2025 year-end
At FY2025 year-end: 24.9x
EBITDA for FY2025
At FY2025 year-end: -2.7%
Free cash flow for FY2025
Dividends per share for FY2025
“Today” uses the latest closing price (2026-11-04, Yahoo Finance daily closing prices) and shares outstanding at the last fiscal year-end. The rest of this page — including the financial table and ROIC vs. WACC — uses fiscal year-end prices. These are reference figures, not a judgment of whether the stock is cheap or expensive.
03
What changed since last earningsFrom SEC data
The latest reported quarter against the same quarter a year earlier, the balance sheet against the previous quarter-end, and what management said in its latest earnings release.
Quarter ended Sep 26, 2026.
- Revenue$13.65B → $16.51B (vs. a year earlier)↑ +20.9%$13.65B → $16.51B (vs. a year earlier)
- Operating margin5.0% → 15.3% (vs. a year earlier)↑ +10.3 pts5.0% → 15.3% (vs. a year earlier)
- Net income$4.06B → $3.32B (vs. a year earlier)↓ −18.3%$4.06B → $3.32B (vs. a year earlier)
- Diluted EPS$0.90 → $0.60 (vs. a year earlier)↓ −33.3%$0.90 → $0.60 (vs. a year earlier)
- Cash$12.87B → $21.85B (vs. previous quarter-end)↑ +69.7%$12.87B → $21.85B (vs. previous quarter-end)
- Long-term debt$48.55B → $46.32B (vs. previous quarter-end)↓ −4.6%$48.55B → $46.32B (vs. previous quarter-end)
Source: Form 10-Q ↗ (SEC XBRL). Long-term debt is the tagged long-term debt figure and leaves out short-term borrowings.
From the earnings release of Oct 29, 2026.
Management outlook • Issued
Forecasts Q4 revenue of $15.0B–$16.0B. Source sentence
▪ Forecasting fourth-quarter 2026 revenue of $15.0 billion to $16.0 billion; forecasting fourth-quarter EPS attributable to Intel of $0.10 and non-GAAP EPS attributable to Intel of $0.25.
Key changes
Completed a $23B public equity offering. Source sentence
Completed a $23 billion public equity offering to support future growth opportunities while maintaining a strong balance sheet and investment-grade rating.
Written by AI. A line appears only if its figures and direction match the quoted sentence, which an automatic check confirms. Companies' outlooks are their own and may not be met. Read the release ↗
04
Company profileFrom SEC dataShow
- Legal name
- INTEL CORP
- Headquarters
- SANTA CLARA, CA
- Incorporated in
- Delaware
- Fiscal year end
- 12/27
- Exchange & ticker
- NASDAQ: INTC
- Industry
- Semiconductors
- CIK
- 50863
- Website
- https://www.intel.com/ ↗
- IR page
- https://www.intc.com/ ↗
Workforce (as of FY2025 year-end)
Employees
85,100
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) cover page and business description
05
Earnings calendarFrom SEC dataShow
When the company reports each quarter: the quarter-end date, the day results were released, and when the 10-Q or 10-K was filed.
Next report
Q4 FY2026
Quarter end: December 2026. In past years, Q4 results were released 26–33 days after quarter end (Jan 22, 2026; Jan 30, 2025; Jan 25, 2024). No date has been announced in the sources this site uses.
Reporting pattern
- Fiscal year ends around December 26.
- Reports four times a year: three quarterly reports (10-Q) and an annual report (10-K) for Q4.
- Earnings releases came 26–33 days after quarter end over the last 12 quarters.
| Quarter | Quarter ended | Earnings release (8-K) | Report filed (10-Q / 10-K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 FY2026 | Sep 26, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 (+33 days) | Oct 30, 2026 10-Q (+34 days) |
| Q2 FY2026 | Jun 27, 2026 | Jul 23, 2026 (+26 days) | Jul 24, 2026 10-Q (+27 days) |
| Q1 FY2026 | Mar 28, 2026 | Apr 23, 2026 (+26 days) | Apr 24, 2026 10-Q (+27 days) |
| Q4 FY2025 | Dec 27, 2025 | Jan 22, 2026 (+26 days) | Jan 23, 2026 10-K (+27 days) |
| Q3 FY2025 | Sep 27, 2025 | Oct 23, 2025 (+26 days) | Nov 6, 2025 10-Q (+40 days) |
| Q2 FY2025 | Jun 28, 2025 | Jul 24, 2025 (+26 days) | Jul 24, 2025 10-Q (+26 days) |
| Q1 FY2025 | Mar 29, 2025 | Apr 24, 2025 (+26 days) | Apr 25, 2025 10-Q (+27 days) |
| Q4 FY2024 | Dec 28, 2024 | Jan 30, 2025 (+33 days) | Jan 31, 2025 10-K (+34 days) |
| Q3 FY2024 | Sep 28, 2024 | Oct 31, 2024 (+33 days) | Nov 1, 2024 10-Q (+34 days) |
| Q2 FY2024 | Jun 29, 2024 | Aug 1, 2024 (+33 days) | Aug 2, 2024 10-Q (+34 days) |
| Q1 FY2024 | Mar 30, 2024 | Apr 25, 2024 (+26 days) | Apr 26, 2024 10-Q (+27 days) |
| Q4 FY2023 | Dec 30, 2023 | Jan 25, 2024 (+26 days) | Jan 26, 2024 10-K (+27 days) |
Source: SEC EDGAR filing history. Release dates are the dates the earnings release was furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K (Item 2.02), which is normally the day results are announced. For a quarter whose 10-Q or 10-K isn’t filed yet, the date is the latest Item 2.02 8-K since the previous report, which may be a preliminary or other results-related update. Fiscal years are labeled by the calendar year in which they end.
06
Flagship products & servicesSite analysis
CCG
Client processors
Notebook and desktop CPUs (client revenue $27.6B in 2025) and other PC and edge products.
DCAI
Data center and AI
Xeon server CPUs, AI accelerators, NICs, IPUs and custom ASICs for cloud, enterprise, telecom and HPC.
Intel Foundry
Foundry services
Leading-edge process technology, wafer manufacturing and advanced packaging for Intel and external customers.
From the Form 10-K, FY2025.
U.S., worldwide and country/regional share of flagship products/services
Only shares the company itself states (in its filings or press releases, sometimes citing a research firm) are shown. Scope and timing vary by figure — treat these as approximate.
Leading-edge logic
U.S. semiconductor manufacturing
U.S. share
Only company with both leading-edge logic R&D and high-volume manufacturing in the U.S.
Company-disclosed“…we are the only company that conducts both leading-edge logic semiconductor process technology R&D and manufacturing in the U.S.”
Worldwide share
—
Not disclosed
07
Recent strategic focusSite analysis
Recent developments.
2025 results
Revenue $52,853M (flat); net loss attributable to Intel $267M; Altera 51% stake sold for $4.3B net.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Q3 2026
Revenue $16.5B (+21%), with the strongest data center growth in 15 years; EPS $0.60 (non-GAAP $0.52). Results beat guidance, but Intel expects the PC slowdown to last at least through the first half of 2027 and guides Q4 revenue to $15.0–16.0B.
Source: Q3 2026 earnings release
Ireland fab buyback
Repurchased Apollo’s 49% interest in the Fab 34 joint venture for $14.2B (April 2026), funded with cash and $6.5B of new notes.
Source: Form 8-K (2026-04-08) — Item 8.01 repurchase of Apollo’s 49% stake in the Ireland Fab 34 joint venture
Equity offering
Agreed August 10, 2026 to sell 210,526,315 shares at $95.00.
Source: Form 8-K (2026-08-12) — Item 8.01 common stock offering
Capex ÷ D&A (FY2025)
1.36x
Well above depreciation — expansion-stage investment
formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization
e.g.$14,646M ÷ $10,757M = 1.36x
termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
R&D-to-revenue ratio (FY2025)
26.1%
formularesearch & development expense ÷ revenue × 100
e.g.$13,774M ÷ $52,853M × 100 = 26.1%
M&A spend (6-year total)
$1.82B
Latest year: $0
Cash-flow-statement spending on acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Where the money goes, over time
Unit: $M. Capex went from $14.26B in FY2020 to $14.65B in FY2025
- Capex
- R&D
- M&A spend
formulacapital expenditures ÷ depreciation & amortization
termsCapital expenditures (capex) · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-01-23
08
Key figures at a glanceFrom SEC data
FY2020–FY2025, 6 years.
Revenue (FY2025)
$52.85B
As reported in the 10-K
Revenue CAGR (5 years)
-7.5%▼caution
formula(last-period revenue ÷ first-period revenue) ^ (1 ÷ years) − 1
e.g.($52,853M ÷ $77,867M) ^ (1÷5) − 1 = -7.5%
termsCAGR · ^ (exponent) · Revenue (net sales)
Operating margin (FY2025)
-4.2%▼caution
-34.6pt vs. 5 years ago
formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100
e.g.$-2,214M ÷ $52,853M × 100 = -4.2%
ROE (FY2025)
-0.3%▼caution
6-year average: 6.6%
As reported in the 10-K
P/B (FY2025 end)
1.58x
formulafiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share
e.g.$36.20 ÷ $22.88 = 1.58x
Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's P/B
EV/EBITDA (FY2025 end)
24.9x
formula(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization)
e.g.($180,783M + $46,585M − $14,265M) ÷ ($-2,214M + $10,757M) = 24.9x
termsEV/EBITDA · Market capitalization · Interest-bearing debt · EBITDA · Depreciation & amortization (D&A)
Period-end (fiscal year-end) value, not today's multiple
- ▼
Revenue grew -7.5% a year over 5 years (a shrinking trend)
From $77.87B in FY2020 to $52.85B in FY2025. The annualized rate (CAGR) makes it possible to compare growth pace across companies of different sizes.
- ▼
Operating margin declined: 30.4% → -4.2%
How much operating profit is left per $100 of revenue. It moved -34.6 points over 5 years — pricing power, cost control, and product mix all show up here.
- ▲
Equity ratio is 54.1% (a high level of financial stability)
The share of total assets funded by equity rather than debt. 50%+ is often read as low bankruptcy risk, though the right level varies by industry (real estate and leasing run lower, for instance).
- ▼
Free cash flow was positive in 2 of 6 years
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditures: the cash left over after funding the business’s own investment, available for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, or debt paydown. A negative year can mean heavy investment, or weak core earnings — worth distinguishing.
- ―
ROE averaged 6.6% over 6 years (latest: -0.3%)
How much profit was generated on shareholders’ equity. Roughly 10%+ is often cited as solid for a U.S. company, though this varies a lot by industry and capital intensity.
09
Business modelSite analysis
Business Model Canvas
The whole company in nine blocks. Left side: how it delivers (partners, activities, resources, costs). Right side: who it serves and how it earns. Every entry comes from the company’s filings shown on this page.
08 · who helps
Key partners
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- NVIDIA
- SoftBank Group
- Silver Lake (Altera)
- Apollo (Ireland Fab 34)
07 · what it does
Key activities
- CCG: PC and edge processors
- DCAI: server CPUs, AI accelerators, NICs, IPUs and custom ASICs
- Intel Foundry: wafer manufacturing, packaging and process technology
06 · what it draws on
Key resources
- 85,100 people at December 27, 2025
- Fabs in the U.S., Ireland, Israel and elsewhere
- CHIPS Act funding and equity from the U.S. government, SoftBank and NVIDIA
02 · why customers buy
Value propositions
- x86 processors and related chips; competes on performance, energy efficiency, ease of integration and innovative design.
04 · how it keeps them
Customer relationships
- Design relationships with OEMs; foundry services for outside customers.
03 · how it reaches them
Channels
- Direct sales to OEMs, ODMs and cloud providers; thousands of systems builders through distributors.
01 · who it serves
Customer segments
- PC and server OEMs, cloud providers, distributors
- Three largest customers 43% of 2025 net revenue
09 · where money goes
Cost structure
FY2025, share of revenue ($52.85B)
- Cost of revenue65.2%
- Research & development26.1%
- Selling, general & administrative8.7%
- Other operating costs4.1%
Revenue here is reported net of interest expense, so these lines overlap and add up to more than 100%.
Operating profit left: -4.2% of revenue. Depreciation & amortization (inside the costs above): $10.76B. Capital spending: $14.65B.
Source: Form 10-K income statement and cash-flow statement (SEC XBRL).
05 · how money comes in
Revenue streams
- CCG $32,228M
- DCAI $16,919M
- Intel Foundry $17,826M incl. intersegment (2025)
Value propositions, channels and customer relationships: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Designs x86 processors and related chips and makes most of them in its own fabs; Intel Foundry also aims to make chips for outside customers.
01 what it draws on
Inputs & resources
- 85,100 people at December 27, 2025
- Fabs in the U.S., Ireland, Israel and elsewhere
- CHIPS Act funding and equity from the U.S. government, SoftBank and NVIDIA
02 what it does
Activities
- CCG: PC and edge processors
- DCAI: server CPUs, AI accelerators, NICs, IPUs and custom ASICs
- Intel Foundry: wafer manufacturing, packaging and process technology
03 who it serves
Customers
- PC and server OEMs, cloud providers, distributors
- Three largest customers 43% of 2025 net revenue
04 how money comes in
How it earns
- CCG $32,228M
- DCAI $16,919M
- Intel Foundry $17,826M incl. intersegment (2025)
How the business makes money
- 2025 operating income: CCG $9,317M, DCAI $3,422M; Intel Foundry operating loss $10,318M.
- Revenue by region 2025: U.S. $15.8B, China $12.7B, Singapore $9.5B, Taiwan $7.7B.
- Dividend suspended after 2024; capex fell to $14.6B in 2025 from $25.8B in 2023.
Government & regulation around the business
Non-market factors from the company’s filings: what governments and regulators fund, buy, set, approve or restrict, and which part of the flow above each one touches.
Intel’s business is tied directly to U.S. industrial policy: CHIPS Act funding, a U.S. government equity stake, and U.S.–China trade restrictions.
Government funding & tax credits
CHIPS Act funding
Received $2.3B of CHIPS Act incentives earlier and the remaining $5.7B of accelerated disbursements in August 2025 after milestone requirements were removed; $3.2B more is tied to the Secure Enclave program.
Supports the businessTouches: Inputs & resources · ActivitiesSource: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Government as customer
U.S. government shareholder
Issued 275M shares to the Department of Commerce, 159M shares into escrow released as Secure Enclave funding arrives, and a warrant for 241M shares exercisable if Intel stops owning at least 51% of Intel Foundry.
Supports and constrainsTouches: ActivitiesSource: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Trade & export rules
U.S.–China trade restrictions
U.S. export restrictions on certain Chinese technology companies, some of them Intel customers, and tariffs have affected customer ordering patterns.
Constrains the businessTouches: Customers · How it earnsSource: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Revenue by segment (FY2025)
Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue
Client Computing Group
32,228 (61%)Data Center and AI
16,919 (32%)Intel Foundry external, all other and eliminations
3,706 (7%)
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) CCG and DCAI segment revenue; the remainder to consolidated net revenue of $52,853M. Intel Foundry reported $17,826M of revenue, mostly intersegment.
10
Where it earnsSite analysis
Many U.S.-listed companies earn most of their revenue outside the U.S. — this breaks down revenue by country/region so it's clear where the business actually makes its money.
Largest market (FY2025)
United States — 30% of revenue
Revenue by country / region (FY2025)
Unit: $M — bar length = revenue, (%) = share of total company revenue
United States
15,757 (30%)China
12,694 (24%)Singapore
9,535 (18%)Taiwan
7,672 (15%)Other
7,195 (14%)
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025) Net revenue by billing location.
11
Contract structureSite analysisShow
Short-term or spot sales carry different earnings quality than long-term or auto-renewing contracts — this shows how the company actually contracts with its customers.
12
Alliances & capital tiesSite analysisShow
Equity stakes, joint ventures, and strategic partnerships disclosed across the 10-K, 8-Ks, and proxy statement.
Capital tie / equity stake
U.S. Department of Commerce
Issued 275 million shares plus 159 million escrowed shares and a warrant (August 2025) after amending the CHIPS Act agreement.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Capital tie / equity stake
NVIDIA
Bought 215 million shares at $23.28 ($5.0B), completed December 26, 2025.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Capital tie / equity stake
SoftBank Group
Bought 87 million shares at $23.00 ($2.0B), completed September 26, 2025.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Joint venture
Silver Lake (Altera)
Sold 51% of Altera to an SLP affiliate on September 12, 2025.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Joint venture
Apollo (Ireland Fab 34)
Intel repurchased Apollo’s 49% stake for $14.2B in April 2026.
13
Customers & suppliersSite analysis
Who the company sells to and buys from. Companies rarely name either, so named counterparties come only from the company's own filings and press releases; otherwise this lists the concentration figures the 10-K discloses.
Customers
PC and server OEMs, cloud providers and distributors.
Named by the company
The three largest customers were 43% of 2025 revenue; the 10-K names Dell, Lenovo and others only in litigation indemnities.
Suppliers
Equipment, materials and third-party foundry suppliers.
Named by the company
No single supplier is named as material.
14
Competitors & peersSite analysis
Competitors the 10-K names, and the peer group the company itself chose in its proxy statement. Nothing here is this site's own pick.
Intel names AMD as CCG’s primary competitor, plus ARM-based PC chips from Apple, Qualcomm and MediaTek; in data centers AMD, NVIDIA, hyperscalers’ custom silicon (Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft) and Broadcom; in foundry TSMC (its primary leading-edge competitor), Samsung, GlobalFoundries, UMC and SMIC.
Competitors named in the 10-K
Peer group the company chose
Technology peer group (17 companies), from the proxy statement. Peers are companies the board considers comparable — for example when setting executive pay — not necessarily direct competitors.
Technology companies used for executive pay benchmarking.
- Advanced Micro Devicessite ↗
- Alphabet (Google)site ↗
- Amazonsite ↗
- Applesite ↗
- Applied Materialssite ↗
- Broadcomsite ↗
- Cisco Systemssite ↗
- Dell Technologiessite ↗
- Hewlett Packard Enterprisesite ↗
- HP Inc.site ↗
- IBMsite ↗
- Meta Platformssite ↗
- Micron Technologysite ↗
- Microsoftsite ↗
- NVIDIAsite ↗
- Qualcommsite ↗
- Texas Instrumentssite ↗
Company names link to this site’s analysis where one exists; “site ↗” opens the company’s own website.
15
Six years of financialsFrom SEC data
Each chart's axis holds a single unit (never mixing dollars, %, and $/share). The table's per-period header links to the filing the numbers came from.
Revenue over time
Unit: $M
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-01-23
Profit over time (operating → net)
Unit: $M
- Operating income
- Pretax income
- Net income
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-01-23
Margins over time
Unit: %
- Operating margin
- Net margin
formulaoperating income ÷ revenue × 100
formulanet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100
Cash flow over time
Unit: $M (below zero = cash went out)
- Operating CF
- Investing CF
- Free CF
formulacash flow from operations − capital expenditures
termsFree cash flow (FCF) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Capital expenditures (capex)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-01-23
Financial stability & capital efficiency
Unit: %
- Equity ratio
- ROE
formulatotal equity ÷ total assets × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)
termsStockholders’ equity · Total assets
formulanet income ÷ average equity (beginning + ending, ÷2) × 100 (as reported in the 10-K)
termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Stockholders’ equity
Earnings per share (EPS) and dividend per share
Unit: $
- EPS
- Dividend per share
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-01-23
| Line item | FY202010-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202110-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202210-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202310-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202410-K on EDGAR ↗ | FY202510-K on EDGAR ↗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement ($M) | ||||||
| Revenue | 77,867 | 79,024 | 63,054 | 54,228 | 53,101 | 52,853 |
| Operating income | 23,678 | 19,456 | 2,334 | 93 | -11,678 | -2,214 |
| Pretax income | 25,078 | 21,703 | 7,768 | 762 | -11,210 | 1,557 |
| Net income (attributable) | 20,899 | 19,868 | 8,014 | 1,689 | -18,756 | -267 |
| Revenue growthcalc(this year’s revenue − last year’s revenue) ÷ last year’s revenue × 100 | — | 1.5% | -20.2% | -14.0% | -2.1% | -0.5% |
| Operating margincalcoperating income ÷ revenue × 100 | 30.4% | 24.6% | 3.7% | 0.2% | -22.0% | -4.2% |
| Net margincalcnet income attributable to the company ÷ revenue × 100 | 26.8% | 25.1% | 12.7% | 3.1% | -35.3% | -0.5% |
| Balance sheet ($M) | ||||||
| Total assets | 153,091 | 168,406 | 182,103 | 191,572 | 196,485 | 211,429 |
| Total equity | 81,038 | 95,391 | 103,286 | 109,965 | 105,032 | 126,360 |
| Interest-bearing debtSum of short- and long-term borrowings, notes/bonds payable | 36,401 | 38,101 | 42,007 | 49,266 | 50,011 | 46,585 |
| Equity ratio | 52.9% | 56.6% | 55.7% | 55.1% | 50.5% | 54.1% |
| ROE | 25.8% | 22.5% | 8.1% | 1.6% | -18.3% | -0.3% |
| Cash flow ($M) | ||||||
| Operating CF | 35,864 | 29,456 | 15,433 | 11,471 | 8,288 | 9,697 |
| Investing CF | -21,524 | -24,283 | -10,231 | -24,041 | -18,256 | -14,821 |
| Financing CF | -12,669 | -6,211 | 1,115 | 8,505 | 11,138 | 11,587 |
| Free cash flowcalccash flow from operations − capital expenditures | 21,605 | 10,723 | -9,411 | -14,279 | -15,656 | -4,949 |
| Cash and equivalents | 5,865 | 4,827 | 11,144 | 7,079 | 8,249 | 14,265 |
| Per share & other | ||||||
| EPS ($) | 4.94 | 4.86 | 1.94 | 0.40 | -4.38 | -0.06 |
| BVPS ($) | 19.95 | 23.44 | 24.52 | 24.97 | 22.93 | 22.88 |
| Dividend per share ($) | 1.32 | 1.39 | 1.46 | 0.74 | 0.38 | — |
| Payout ratiocalcdividend per share ÷ diluted EPS × 100 | 26.7% | 28.6% | 75.3% | 185.0% | — | — |
| P/E (x) | 9.5 | 10.6 | 13.6 | 125.6 | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA (x)calc(market cap + interest-bearing debt − cash and equivalents) ÷ (operating income + depreciation & amortization) | 6.5 | 8.2 | 10.4 | 32.1 | — | 24.9 |
| P/B (x)calcfiscal year-end closing price ÷ book value per share | 2.36 | 2.19 | 1.08 | 2.01 | 0.89 | 1.58 |
P/B and EV/EBITDA use each period’s period-end (fiscal year-end) figures, not the current share price. Periods below 1x are shown in red. Figures without a "calc" tag are as reported in the Form 10-K (the consolidated financial statements and, for older years, earlier 10-Ks), pulled automatically from SEC EDGAR. Where a later filing restated a prior period, the restated figure is used.
Last 8 quarters
Three-month figures from 10-Q filings. Change is versus the same quarter a year earlier. Newest quarter on top.
| Quarter ended | Revenue | Operating income | Net income | Diluted EPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-26 | $16.51B+20.9% | $2.52B+269.3% | $3.32B-18.3% | $0.60 |
| 2026-06-27 | $16.13B+25.4% | $1.8B | −$11.03B | $-2.16 |
| 2026-03-28 | $13.58B+7.2% | −$3.14B | −$3.73B | $-0.73 |
| 2025-12-27 † | $13.67B-4.1% | $580M+40.8% | −$591M | — |
| 2025-09-27 | $13.65B | $683M | $4.06B | $0.90 |
| 2025-06-28 | $12.86B | −$3.18B | −$2.92B | $-0.67 |
| 2025-03-29 | $12.67B | −$301M | −$821M | $-0.19 |
| 2024-12-28 † | $14.26B | $412M | −$126M | — |
† Fourth quarter = the 10-K’s annual figure minus the first three quarters; quarterly EPS isn’t derived this way because share counts change during the year.
16
Is ROIC above WACC?From SEC data
ROIC (the return on money invested in the business) above WACC (the cost of raising that money) means the company is creating value. WACC is an estimate, so its assumptions can be adjusted below.
ROIC (FY2025)
-1.3%
formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)
e.g.$-2,214M × (1 − 3.5%) ÷ $163,994M × 100 = -1.3%
termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity
WACC (this site’s estimate)
12.10%
formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight
e.g.Equity weight: $180.78B ÷ ($180.78B + $46.59B) = 79.5%
e.g.Debt weight: $46.59B ÷ ($180.78B + $46.59B) = 20.5%
e.g.WACC: 14.6% × 79.5% + 2.3% × (1 − 3.5%) × 20.5% = 12.10%
termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization
How firm is this? With the equity risk premium ±1 point and beta ±0.2, WACC runs 10.0%–14.5% and ROIC − WACC runs −15.8 to −11.3 points. The sign holds across this range. This describes the latest year and does not predict future value creation.
WACC 12.10% is this site’s estimate under the assumptions below (not a figure the company has published)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.95% (10-year Treasury, 2026-11-03)
- β
- 1.76 (price-derived adjusted beta)
- Equity risk premium
- 5.5%
- Cost of equity
- 14.63%
- Cost of debt
- 2.34%
- Tax rate
- 3.5% (effective rate, FY2022–FY2025)
- Capital structure (equity : debt)
- 80% : 20%
ROIC over time, vs. WACC
Unit: % — bars = each period's ROIC, horizontal line = latest WACC. Bars above the line are green, below are red
- ROIC (above WACC)
- ROIC (below WACC)
- WACC 12.10%
formulaoperating income × (1 − tax rate) ÷ invested capital × 100 *invested capital = interest-bearing debt + total equity (average of beginning/ending)
termsOperating income · Effective tax rate · Invested capital · Interest-bearing debt · Total equity
formulacost of equity × equity weight + cost of debt × (1 − tax rate) × debt weight
termsCost of equity · Equity weight (E/(D+E)) · Cost of debt · (1 − tax rate) · Debt weight (D/(D+E)) · Market capitalization
Try different WACC assumptions
β and the equity risk premium are estimates with a real range of plausible values — move the sliders to check whether ROIC > WACC still holds. The risk-free rate starts at the 10-year Treasury yield on 2026-11-03 (U.S. Treasury).
Initial β: 1.76 (price-derived adjusted beta. Raw β 2.13, R² 0.21, 130 weeks)
formula0.67 × β + 0.33 (β = the slope of weekly stock returns regressed on weekly market returns)
e.g.0.67 × 2.135 + 0.33 = 1.760
termsβ (beta)
Period 2024-05-10–2026-11-04, using S&P 500 ETF (SPY) as the market proxy. Source: Yahoo Finance price history.
formularisk-free rate + β × equity risk premium
e.g.5.0% + 1.76 × 5.5% = 14.6%
termsCAPM · Risk-free rate · β (beta) · Equity risk premium (market risk premium)
formulafiscal year-end closing price × shares outstanding (= market cap)
formulainterest expense ÷ interest-bearing debt × 100 (clamped to 0–10%; falls back to the risk-free rate if there’s no debt)
17
What the price implies (DCF)From SEC data
A company's value can be written as its free cash flow divided by (cost of capital − perpetual growth). Working that backwards from the market's valuation shows how much growth the share price assumed — compared here with the company's actual past growth.
Not enough data for this calculation (FY2025): it needs positive free cash flow, a fiscal year-end P/E, and a positive enterprise value.
18
Earnings qualityFrom SEC dataShow
The same reported profit can mean different things depending on whether it's backed by cash, driven by the core business, or the result of a one-off item. Four checks below.
- ✓
Operating CF ÷ net income: averages 2.98x
Profit is backed by cash coming in.
- ✓
Accrual ratio (latest): -4.9%
A small share of profit rests on accounting estimates.
- !
Core-earnings share (operating income ÷ pretax income): -142%
Non-operating items (interest income, equity-method gains, other income/expense) are having a bigger effect.
- ✓
Days sales outstanding: 32 → 25 days
No major slowdown in collecting on sales.
Operating CF vs. net income
Unit: $M — operating CF above net income means profit is backed by cash
- Operating CF
- Net income
formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company
termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)
formula(net income − operating CF) ÷ average total assets × 100
termsNet income (attributable to the company) · Cash flow from operations (operating CF) · Total assets
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-01-23
Profit bridge (FY2025)
Unit: $M — what moved profit from operating income to net income
- Profit (each stage)
- Pushed profit up
- Pushed profit down
formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100
termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)
Source: each period's Form 10-K (SEC EDGAR). Latest: filed 2026-01-23
Receivables & inventory days
Unit: days — days grow when receivables or inventory build up faster than sales
- Days sales outstanding
- Days inventory outstanding
formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365
formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365
termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)
Worked examples (latest period)
formulacash flow from operations ÷ net income attributable to the company
termsCash flow from operations (operating CF) · Net income (attributable to the company)
formulaoperating income ÷ income before income taxes × 100
e.g.$-2,214M ÷ $1,557M × 100 = -142%
termsOperating income · Income before income taxes (pretax income)
formulaaverage receivables (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ revenue × 365
e.g.($3,478M + $3,839M) ÷ 2 ÷ $52,853M × 365 = 25 days
formulaaverage inventory (opening + closing ÷ 2) ÷ cost of revenue × 365
e.g.($12,198M + $11,618M) ÷ 2 ÷ $34,478M × 365 = 126 days
termsInventory · Cost of revenue (COGS)
19
Who holds the sharesFrom SEC dataShow
How much of the stock large institutional investors report owning on SEC Form 13F, how much the directors and executive officers hold (and how much of the vote they control), and roughly how much is left for individual investors. Shown next to beta so the holder mix can be read alongside how much the stock swings.
Institutions, insiders and everyone else, 13F holdings as of 2026-06-30
“Everyone else” is what remains after shares reported on Form 13F and shares held by directors and executive officers: mostly individual investors, plus non-insider families or foundations and smaller or foreign institutions. The figures have different dates and 13F reports count some shares twice — read it as an approximate split.
- Held by 13F filers
- 69.9%
- Directors & officers (shares)
- <1%
- Everyone else (est.)
- 30.1%
- Directors & officers (voting power)
- <1%
- Institutional-ownership rank
- 377 of 416
- Beta (adjusted)
- 1.76
individuals and other non-13F holders
no separate voting figure; shown as shares
1 = most institutional; 90% of covered companies have more
above 1 = swings more than the market
- 3,524.1M shares reported by 3,556 13F filers ÷ 5,044.0M shares outstanding on 2026-07-17. Option positions are excluded.
- Directors and executive officers as a group, from the proxy statement’s beneficial-ownership table (percentage computed from the group’s share count ÷ shares outstanding); includes shares they can acquire within 60 days.
- A large “everyone else” share can still reflect a family, trust or foundation stake held outside the board; check the proxy statement’s 5% holders.
Sources: SEC Form 13F data set (holdings as of 2026-06-30) · Form DEF 14A filed 2026-03-23 (beneficial ownership table) · Form 10-Q cover page (shares outstanding as of 2026-07-17)
20
Strengths & weaknessesSite analysis
Strengths
1. U.S. leading-edge manufacturing
Intel says it is the only company conducting both leading-edge logic R&D and high-volume manufacturing in the U.S.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
2. Profitable product units
Intel Products earned $12,739M of operating income in 2025 (CCG 29% margin).
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
3. New capital
Raised $2.0B from SoftBank, $5.0B from NVIDIA and U.S. government equity in 2025, and about $20B from a stock offering in August 2026.
Evidence: Form 8-K (2026-08-12) — Item 8.01 common stock offering
4. Government-backed U.S. manufacturing
Received $5.7B of accelerated CHIPS Act disbursements in August 2025 alongside a U.S. government equity investment.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Weaknesses
1. Foundry losses
Intel Foundry lost $10.3B in 2025 and $13.3B in 2024.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
2. Shrinking revenue
Revenue fell from $79.0B (2021) to $52.9B (2025).
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
3. Supply constraints
Intel 7 and Intel 3 wafer constraints limited client and server sales in Q4 2025 and into 2026.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
4. Customer concentration
Three largest customers were 43% of 2025 revenue.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
21
What draws investors to itSite analysis
Why the stock can look attractive to investors — each point paired with what has to hold for it to stay true, and the opposing view. This is this site's analysis, not a recommendation to buy or sell.
P/E (FY2025)
—
Price at fiscal year-end ÷ diluted EPS
Dividend yield (FY2025)
—
Dividends per share ÷ fiscal year-end price
Payout ratio (FY2025)
—
Dividends per share ÷ diluted EPS
FCF yield (FY2025)
-2.7%
(Operating CF − capex) ÷ market cap
1. Turnaround leverage
Product units are profitable; foundry losses are narrowing ($13.3B to $10.3B).
- What has to hold
- Process roadmap and external foundry demand succeed.
- The other side
- Heavy competition and capital needs.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
2. Strategic backing
U.S. government, NVIDIA and SoftBank became shareholders.
- What has to hold
- Support continues.
- The other side
- Dilution and government influence.
Evidence: Form 10-K (FY2025)
Dividends were suspended after 2024. 2020–21 dividend per share is the declared amount ($1.32 and $1.39).
22
ResilienceSite analysisShow
How well the company could absorb a bad year: its financial buffer, how its revenue and profit held up in the worst year on record, and what the 10-K says about the business's exposure to shocks. Figures and filing statements only — no overall rating.
1. Financial buffer (FY2025)
Cash & short-term investments ÷ debt due within a year
15.0x
$37.42B vs. $2.5B
Interest coverage (operating income ÷ interest expense)
-2.0x
−$2.21B vs. $1.09B
Free cash flow ÷ dividends paid
—
2. Worst year in the record, and the recovery
| Figure | Worst year-over-year change | Back to the prior level? |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | -20.2% in FY2022 ($79.02B → $63.05B) | Not yet, as of FY2025 |
| Operating income | -12657.0% in FY2024 ($93M → −$11.68B) | Not yet, as of FY2025 |
Covers only the 6 fiscal years on record (FY2020–FY2025), which may not include a full recession — the worst year here isn’t necessarily how the company would fare in a severe downturn.
3. Business resilience (from the 10-K)
Cash flow positive through losses
Operating cash flow stayed positive every year 2020–2025 ($8.3B–$35.9B) despite net losses in 2024–2025.
Source: Form 10-K (FY2025)
23
Legal & regulatory mattersSite analysisShow
Lawsuits, government investigations, enforcement actions and settlements the company discloses — where each stands, what is at stake, and what comes next. From the 10-K's Legal Proceedings and contingencies note, the latest 10-Q, and 8-Ks.
Intel has large patent and antitrust disputes; it has accrued $1.0B for VLSI litigation and $312M for an EC fine as of September 26, 2026.
5 open matters (2 flagged as major)
VLSI patent litigation
PendingPatent / IPMajorVLSI Technology v. Intel
VLSI (Fortress) sued over NXP-origin patents. A 2021 jury awarded $2.2B; on appeal one $675M award was reversed and the $1.5B award vacated for a new damages trial. A 2022 jury awarded about $949M on another patent (no final judgment). PTAB found the first case’s claims unpatentable; Intel also asserts a license defense. In China, the Supreme People's Court affirmed a finding of non-infringement in VLSI's Shanghai case in August 2026.
- Amounts
- $1.0B accrued
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-26) — Contingencies, Legal Proceedings
EC competition matter
On appealAntitrustMajorEuropean Commission v. Intel
The EC’s 2009 €1.1B fine was annulled on the rebate findings in 2022 and refunded, and the Court of Justice upheld that judgment. In September 2023 the EC imposed a €376M fine on the remaining finding (payments to prevent sales of rival products); the General Court cut it to €237M in December 2025 and Intel appealed in February 2026. Intel has accrued $308M including interest.
- Amounts
- $308M accrued
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-26) — Contingencies, Legal Proceedings
Securities class action over foundry segment reporting
On appealClass actionShareholders v. Intel and officers
A 2024 suit alleged misleading statements before Intel’s 2024 segment-reporting change; the district court dismissed it and plaintiffs appealed. Derivative suits are stayed.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-26) — Contingencies, Legal Proceedings
Security vulnerability consumer class actions
PendingClass actionConsumers v. Intel
Consumer class actions in the U.S. and Canada over CPU security vulnerabilities; the U.S. “Downfall” suit was dismissed in August 2024.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-26) — Contingencies, Legal Proceedings
EireOg patent suits against Intel customers
PendingPatent / IPEireOg Innovations v. IBM et al.
EireOg filed eleven suits against Intel customers alleging over $2.0B of damages; Intel indemnifies AWS, Cisco, Dell, HPE, IBM, Lenovo and Oracle. A Cisco jury found no infringement in April 2026.
Source: Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-26) — Contingencies, Legal Proceedings
Company statement: Other proceedings are described as ordinary-course and not expected to be material.
Based on Form 10-Q (quarter ended 2026-09-26) — Contingencies, Legal Proceedings, reviewed 2026-10-25. Routine ordinary-course claims are not listed. “Major” is this site’s judgment of which matters could materially affect results.
24
Risks (including geopolitical)Site analysis
Starting from the 10-K's Risk Factors section, organized by category — geopolitical, currency, raw materials, regulatory, disaster, and more — with impact and likelihood assessed by this site.
Risk map
Vertical = impact on results, horizontal = likelihood. Upper right = most severe. Numbers match the list below (placement is this site’s own assessment).
Likelihood →
"Company disclosure" vs. "this site’s assessment"
The description and mitigation for each risk are this site’s summary of the 10-K’s "Risk Factors" section. Impact and likelihood are this site’s own assessment, not the company’s — where the company discloses its own likelihood assessment, that is noted in the summary.
Impact is judged from how large the affected business is relative to total revenue/profit, and from the risk’s track record of moving results in the past. Likelihood is judged from the filing’s wording and the current business environment (already occurring, or recurring). See the rating criteria.
- 1Competition & technology shift
CPU and AI competition
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- AMD in x86; Apple, Qualcomm and MediaTek with ARM PCs; NVIDIA GPUs and hyperscaler custom silicon in data centers.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact High / Likelihood High
- 2Competition & technology shift
Foundry execution
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- TSMC leads in leading-edge manufacturing; Samsung, GlobalFoundries, UMC and SMIC also compete.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- We intend to address these trends through continued investment in our leading-edge process technologies, packaging innovation and ecosystem partnerships to enable next-generation compute solutions.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact High / Likelihood High
- 3Governance & key people
U.S. government stake
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- The U.S. government is one of the largest stockholders and generally votes with the board; this may limit strategic options.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood Med
- 4Customer/supplier concentration
Large customers
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- Top three customers 43% of revenue.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact High / Likelihood Med
- 5Law & regulation
Patent and antitrust litigation
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- VLSI patent verdicts ($1.0B accrued) and an EC fine (accrual $308M).
- Company’s stated mitigation
- Not stated in the filings.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood Med
- 6Geopolitics & supply chain
China exposure
- Company disclosure (summarized from the 10-K)
- China was $12.7B of 2025 revenue.
- Company’s stated mitigation
- We source various critical semiconductor development and manufacturing tools and materials, including rare earth elements, minerals and metals, from multiple suppliers.
- This site’s assessment
- Impact Med / Likelihood High
25
What changed in the risk factorsFrom SEC data
Paragraphs in the latest 10-K's Risk Factors that have little overlap with the year before, and paragraphs that were dropped.
New or substantially reworded (8)
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Read more
Words such as "accelerate", "achieve", "aim", "ambitions", "anticipate", "believe", "committed", "continue", "could", "designed", "estimate", "expect", "forecast", "future", "goals", "grow", "guidance", "intend", "likely", "may", "might", "milestones", "next generation", "objective", "on track", "opportunity", "outlook", "pending", "plan", "position", "possible", "potential", "predict", "progress", "ramp", "roadmap", "seek", "should", "strive", "targets", "to be", "upcoming", "will", "would" and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, which may include statements regarding:
▪ future cash requirements, the availability, uses, sufficiency and cost of capital resources, and sources of funding, including for future capital and R&D investments and for returns to stockholders, and credit ratings expectations;
▪ future products, services and technologies, and the expected goals, timeline, ramps, progress, availability, production, regulation and benefits of such products, services and technologies, including future process nodes and packaging technology, product roadmaps, schedules, future product architectures, expectations regarding process performance, per-watt parity and metrics, and expectations regarding product and process competitiveness;
Such statements involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied, including those associated with:
▪ macroeconomic conditions and geopolitical tensions and conflicts, including geopolitical and trade tensions between the U.S. Read more
and China, tensions and conflict affecting Israel and the Middle East, rising tensions between mainland China and Taiwan and the impacts of Russia's war on Ukraine;
▪ recently elevated geopolitical tensions, volatility and uncertainty with respect to international trade policies, including tariffs and export controls, impacting our business, the markets in which we compete and the world economy;
Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Read more
Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this Form 10-K and in other documents we file from time to time with the SEC that disclose risks and uncertainties that may affect our business.
Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures, mergers, acquisitions or other business combinations that have not been completed as of the date of this filing. In addition, the forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K are based on management's expectations as of the date of this filing, unless an earlier date is specified, including expectations based on third-party information and projections that management believes to be reputable. We do not undertake, and expressly disclaim any duty, to update such statements, whether as a result of new information, new developments, or otherwise, except to the extent that disclosure may be required by law.
No longer in the text (4)
We are continually engaged in the development of next-generation technologies. Read more
Forecasting our progress and schedule for developing advanced nodes and other technologies is challenging, and at times we encounter unexpected delays due to the complexity of interactions among steps in the manufacturing process, challenges in using new materials or new production equipment, and other issues. Diagnosing defects in our manufacturing processes often takes a long time, as manufacturing throughput times can delay our receipt of data about defects and the effectiveness of fixes, and defects can be more serious and difficult to resolve than initially anticipated.
Our efforts to innovate involve significant expense and carry inherent risks, including difficulties in designing and developing next-generation process and packaging technologies, and investments in manufacturing assets and facilities that are made years in advance. We cannot guarantee that we will realize the expected benefits of next-generation process technologies, including the expected cost, performance, power, and density advantages, or that we will achieve an adequate return on our capital and R&D investments, particularly as the development of new nodes has grown increasingly expensive. In such circumstances, we may be required to write down the value of some of our manufacturing assets and facilities, increasing our expenses, as we were required to do in the third quarter of 2024 with respect to the Intel 7 process node.
Our disaggregated design strategy poses increased logistical risks and challenges, particularly where we decide to manufacture different product components on different process technologies, including third-party foundries' process technologies. To combine components in a single package, they need to be manufactured on a timely basis and in sufficient quantities, while the manufacturing processes we utilize may have differing yields, throughput times, and capacity constraints. We may be required to safely store some components pending the manufacture of others. Delays or quality issues with one component could limit our ability to manufacture the entire completed product. In addition, the packaging technologies used to combine these components can increase our costs and may introduce additional complexity and quality issues. To the extent we are unable to manage these risks, our ability…
From time to time, disruptions in the production process result from errors; Read more
defects in materials; delays in obtaining or revising permits and licenses; interruptions in our supply of materials, resources, or production equipment; adverse changes in equipment productivity; and disruptions at our fabrication and assembly and test facilities due to accidents, maintenance issues, power interruptions, equipment malfunctions, or unsafe working conditions—all of which could affect the timing of production ramps and yields and could result in production timing delays. Production issues periodically lead to increased costs and affect our ability to meet product demand, which can adversely impact our business and the results of operations.
415 more paragraphs differ; the filings below have the full text.
Matched automatically, quoted as filed, and may include rewording of an existing risk. Compares Item 1A of the 10-K filed Jan 23, 2026 ↗ with the 10-K filed Jan 31, 2025 ↗.
26
What to watch going forwardSite analysis
- Intel Foundry losses and external customer wins.
- Supply of Intel 7/Intel 3 wafers and client/server demand.
- Accounting losses on escrowed U.S. government shares as the stock price moves.
- Use of 2026 equity proceeds and debt levels.
27
Source documentsShow
This page's financial figures come from the Form 10-Ks listed below. Check the original filings for full detail.
Other sources referenced in the analysis
Last updated
Analysis last edited: November 6, 2026 · Financial data fetched: October 25, 2026 09:52 (SEC EDGAR) · Source 10-K filed: January 23, 2026
Built on10-K FY2025 · filed 2026-01-23Proxy statement (2026)
Next update expectedAfter FY2026’s 10-K is filed (roughly 60–90 days after fiscal year end (sooner for larger filers)), financials and analysis will be refreshed.
This page is this site’s own analysis based on public information, and does not represent Intel’s views. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security, and this site does not guarantee the accuracy of any figure or statement here. Always verify against the original source documents before making an investment decision.